Cargando…

Use of a chlorhexidine-impregnated dressing reduced catheter-related bloodstream infections caused by Gram-positive microorganisms

OBJECTIVE: We compared the protective effects of secure Chlorhexidine Gluconate (CHG)-containing dressings with those of non-antimicrobial transparent dressings. METHODS: This prospective, comparative, single-center clinical study was conducted in a tertiary pediatric intensive care unit from Octobe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ergul, Ayse Betul, Gokcek, Ikbal, Ozcan, Alper, Cetin, Serife, Gultekin, Nurkan, Torun, Yasemin Altuner
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Professional Medical Publications 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5954377/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29805406
http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.342.14810
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: We compared the protective effects of secure Chlorhexidine Gluconate (CHG)-containing dressings with those of non-antimicrobial transparent dressings. METHODS: This prospective, comparative, single-center clinical study was conducted in a tertiary pediatric intensive care unit from October 2014 to March 2017. The inclusion criterion was catheterization of the jugular vein for ≥48 hour. The study was conducted in two phases. Non-antimicrobial standard dressings were applied both before and after the CHG- dressing phase to negate any coincidental temporal effect. During the standard-dressing phases, the dressings did not include any antimicrobial; transparent CHG-impregnated dressings were applied during the test phase. All patients were divided into two groups by the type of dressing applied (standard and CHG-containing dressings). RESULTS: The standard- and CHG-dressing groups contained 68 and 63 patients, respectively. The median durations of catheterization were 13 (8–22) and 14 (2–28) days, respectively (p>0.05). The Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infection (CRBSI) rate was somewhat lower in the CHG-dressing group (20.6 vs. 26.5%), but the difference was not statistically significant (p>0.05). In the CHG-dressing group, CRBSIs caused by Gram-positive microorganisms totaled 0%, but the figure was 8.8% in the control group (p=0.028). CONCLUSIONS: CHG dressings reduced CRBSIs caused by Gram-positive microorganisms.