Cargando…

A Comparison of Insulin Pen Devices and Disposable Plastic Syringes – Simplicity, Safety, Convenience and Cost Differences

Context: Managing diabetes efficiently demands a simple, safe, convenient and economical therapy. This study was done to understand the simplicity, safety, convenience and cost effectiveness of using pen versus syringe devices in patients on long-term insulin therapy. Design: This prospective observ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Singh, Ripudaman, Samuel, Clarence, Jacob, Jubbin J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Touch Medical Media 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5954595/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29922352
http://dx.doi.org/10.17925/EE.2018.14.1.47
_version_ 1783323549765730304
author Singh, Ripudaman
Samuel, Clarence
Jacob, Jubbin J
author_facet Singh, Ripudaman
Samuel, Clarence
Jacob, Jubbin J
author_sort Singh, Ripudaman
collection PubMed
description Context: Managing diabetes efficiently demands a simple, safe, convenient and economical therapy. This study was done to understand the simplicity, safety, convenience and cost effectiveness of using pen versus syringe devices in patients on long-term insulin therapy. Design: This prospective observational study was conducted at the endocrine outpatient department of a universityaffiliated teaching hospital in North India. The investigator interviewed patients using a self-made questionnaire after obtaining consent; patients were scored based on their answers. A high score represented a poor response. A total of 90 completed questionnaires (45 from each group) were obtained. Results: Mean simplicity, safety and convenience score among the pen users was 5.31 ± 0.51, 5.4 ± 0.89 and 4.13 ± 1.04 respectively, as compared to 9.78 ± 1.43, 8.09 ± 2.02 and 8.67 ± 0.56 in syringe users respectively. The difference in these scores was statistically significant (p=0.0001). All patients felt that treatment using pen device was costlier when compared to using syringes, with pen users spending Rs1,756 per month on their insulin therapy, as compared to syringe users, who spent Rs590 per month. Among insulin pen users, 22.2% had optimal glycated haemoglobin levels (6–7.5%) as compared to 2.2% among syringe users, and this difference was statistically significant (p=0.007). Conclusions: An insulin pen is simple, safe and convenient to use, and may provide better glycaemic control. Treatment with a pen device is costlier, which may be due to the higher use of analogue insulin among pen users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5954595
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Touch Medical Media
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59545952018-06-19 A Comparison of Insulin Pen Devices and Disposable Plastic Syringes – Simplicity, Safety, Convenience and Cost Differences Singh, Ripudaman Samuel, Clarence Jacob, Jubbin J Eur Endocrinol Diabetes Context: Managing diabetes efficiently demands a simple, safe, convenient and economical therapy. This study was done to understand the simplicity, safety, convenience and cost effectiveness of using pen versus syringe devices in patients on long-term insulin therapy. Design: This prospective observational study was conducted at the endocrine outpatient department of a universityaffiliated teaching hospital in North India. The investigator interviewed patients using a self-made questionnaire after obtaining consent; patients were scored based on their answers. A high score represented a poor response. A total of 90 completed questionnaires (45 from each group) were obtained. Results: Mean simplicity, safety and convenience score among the pen users was 5.31 ± 0.51, 5.4 ± 0.89 and 4.13 ± 1.04 respectively, as compared to 9.78 ± 1.43, 8.09 ± 2.02 and 8.67 ± 0.56 in syringe users respectively. The difference in these scores was statistically significant (p=0.0001). All patients felt that treatment using pen device was costlier when compared to using syringes, with pen users spending Rs1,756 per month on their insulin therapy, as compared to syringe users, who spent Rs590 per month. Among insulin pen users, 22.2% had optimal glycated haemoglobin levels (6–7.5%) as compared to 2.2% among syringe users, and this difference was statistically significant (p=0.007). Conclusions: An insulin pen is simple, safe and convenient to use, and may provide better glycaemic control. Treatment with a pen device is costlier, which may be due to the higher use of analogue insulin among pen users. Touch Medical Media 2018-04 2018-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5954595/ /pubmed/29922352 http://dx.doi.org/10.17925/EE.2018.14.1.47 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License, which permits any non-commercial use, distribution, adaptation and reproduction provided the original author(s) and source are given appropriate credit. © The Author(s) 2018. Compliance with Ethics: All procedures were followed in accordance with the responsible committee on human experimentation and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975 and subsequent revisions. Authorship: All named authors meet the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) criteria for authorship of this manuscript, take responsibility for the integrity of the work as a whole, and have given final approval to the version to be published. Review Process: Double-blind peer review.
spellingShingle Diabetes
Singh, Ripudaman
Samuel, Clarence
Jacob, Jubbin J
A Comparison of Insulin Pen Devices and Disposable Plastic Syringes – Simplicity, Safety, Convenience and Cost Differences
title A Comparison of Insulin Pen Devices and Disposable Plastic Syringes – Simplicity, Safety, Convenience and Cost Differences
title_full A Comparison of Insulin Pen Devices and Disposable Plastic Syringes – Simplicity, Safety, Convenience and Cost Differences
title_fullStr A Comparison of Insulin Pen Devices and Disposable Plastic Syringes – Simplicity, Safety, Convenience and Cost Differences
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Insulin Pen Devices and Disposable Plastic Syringes – Simplicity, Safety, Convenience and Cost Differences
title_short A Comparison of Insulin Pen Devices and Disposable Plastic Syringes – Simplicity, Safety, Convenience and Cost Differences
title_sort comparison of insulin pen devices and disposable plastic syringes – simplicity, safety, convenience and cost differences
topic Diabetes
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5954595/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29922352
http://dx.doi.org/10.17925/EE.2018.14.1.47
work_keys_str_mv AT singhripudaman acomparisonofinsulinpendevicesanddisposableplasticsyringessimplicitysafetyconvenienceandcostdifferences
AT samuelclarence acomparisonofinsulinpendevicesanddisposableplasticsyringessimplicitysafetyconvenienceandcostdifferences
AT jacobjubbinj acomparisonofinsulinpendevicesanddisposableplasticsyringessimplicitysafetyconvenienceandcostdifferences
AT singhripudaman comparisonofinsulinpendevicesanddisposableplasticsyringessimplicitysafetyconvenienceandcostdifferences
AT samuelclarence comparisonofinsulinpendevicesanddisposableplasticsyringessimplicitysafetyconvenienceandcostdifferences
AT jacobjubbinj comparisonofinsulinpendevicesanddisposableplasticsyringessimplicitysafetyconvenienceandcostdifferences