Cargando…
A Comparison of Insulin Pen Devices and Disposable Plastic Syringes – Simplicity, Safety, Convenience and Cost Differences
Context: Managing diabetes efficiently demands a simple, safe, convenient and economical therapy. This study was done to understand the simplicity, safety, convenience and cost effectiveness of using pen versus syringe devices in patients on long-term insulin therapy. Design: This prospective observ...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Touch Medical Media
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5954595/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29922352 http://dx.doi.org/10.17925/EE.2018.14.1.47 |
_version_ | 1783323549765730304 |
---|---|
author | Singh, Ripudaman Samuel, Clarence Jacob, Jubbin J |
author_facet | Singh, Ripudaman Samuel, Clarence Jacob, Jubbin J |
author_sort | Singh, Ripudaman |
collection | PubMed |
description | Context: Managing diabetes efficiently demands a simple, safe, convenient and economical therapy. This study was done to understand the simplicity, safety, convenience and cost effectiveness of using pen versus syringe devices in patients on long-term insulin therapy. Design: This prospective observational study was conducted at the endocrine outpatient department of a universityaffiliated teaching hospital in North India. The investigator interviewed patients using a self-made questionnaire after obtaining consent; patients were scored based on their answers. A high score represented a poor response. A total of 90 completed questionnaires (45 from each group) were obtained. Results: Mean simplicity, safety and convenience score among the pen users was 5.31 ± 0.51, 5.4 ± 0.89 and 4.13 ± 1.04 respectively, as compared to 9.78 ± 1.43, 8.09 ± 2.02 and 8.67 ± 0.56 in syringe users respectively. The difference in these scores was statistically significant (p=0.0001). All patients felt that treatment using pen device was costlier when compared to using syringes, with pen users spending Rs1,756 per month on their insulin therapy, as compared to syringe users, who spent Rs590 per month. Among insulin pen users, 22.2% had optimal glycated haemoglobin levels (6–7.5%) as compared to 2.2% among syringe users, and this difference was statistically significant (p=0.007). Conclusions: An insulin pen is simple, safe and convenient to use, and may provide better glycaemic control. Treatment with a pen device is costlier, which may be due to the higher use of analogue insulin among pen users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5954595 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Touch Medical Media |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59545952018-06-19 A Comparison of Insulin Pen Devices and Disposable Plastic Syringes – Simplicity, Safety, Convenience and Cost Differences Singh, Ripudaman Samuel, Clarence Jacob, Jubbin J Eur Endocrinol Diabetes Context: Managing diabetes efficiently demands a simple, safe, convenient and economical therapy. This study was done to understand the simplicity, safety, convenience and cost effectiveness of using pen versus syringe devices in patients on long-term insulin therapy. Design: This prospective observational study was conducted at the endocrine outpatient department of a universityaffiliated teaching hospital in North India. The investigator interviewed patients using a self-made questionnaire after obtaining consent; patients were scored based on their answers. A high score represented a poor response. A total of 90 completed questionnaires (45 from each group) were obtained. Results: Mean simplicity, safety and convenience score among the pen users was 5.31 ± 0.51, 5.4 ± 0.89 and 4.13 ± 1.04 respectively, as compared to 9.78 ± 1.43, 8.09 ± 2.02 and 8.67 ± 0.56 in syringe users respectively. The difference in these scores was statistically significant (p=0.0001). All patients felt that treatment using pen device was costlier when compared to using syringes, with pen users spending Rs1,756 per month on their insulin therapy, as compared to syringe users, who spent Rs590 per month. Among insulin pen users, 22.2% had optimal glycated haemoglobin levels (6–7.5%) as compared to 2.2% among syringe users, and this difference was statistically significant (p=0.007). Conclusions: An insulin pen is simple, safe and convenient to use, and may provide better glycaemic control. Treatment with a pen device is costlier, which may be due to the higher use of analogue insulin among pen users. Touch Medical Media 2018-04 2018-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5954595/ /pubmed/29922352 http://dx.doi.org/10.17925/EE.2018.14.1.47 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License, which permits any non-commercial use, distribution, adaptation and reproduction provided the original author(s) and source are given appropriate credit. © The Author(s) 2018. Compliance with Ethics: All procedures were followed in accordance with the responsible committee on human experimentation and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975 and subsequent revisions. Authorship: All named authors meet the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) criteria for authorship of this manuscript, take responsibility for the integrity of the work as a whole, and have given final approval to the version to be published. Review Process: Double-blind peer review. |
spellingShingle | Diabetes Singh, Ripudaman Samuel, Clarence Jacob, Jubbin J A Comparison of Insulin Pen Devices and Disposable Plastic Syringes – Simplicity, Safety, Convenience and Cost Differences |
title | A Comparison of Insulin Pen Devices and Disposable Plastic Syringes – Simplicity, Safety, Convenience and Cost Differences |
title_full | A Comparison of Insulin Pen Devices and Disposable Plastic Syringes – Simplicity, Safety, Convenience and Cost Differences |
title_fullStr | A Comparison of Insulin Pen Devices and Disposable Plastic Syringes – Simplicity, Safety, Convenience and Cost Differences |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparison of Insulin Pen Devices and Disposable Plastic Syringes – Simplicity, Safety, Convenience and Cost Differences |
title_short | A Comparison of Insulin Pen Devices and Disposable Plastic Syringes – Simplicity, Safety, Convenience and Cost Differences |
title_sort | comparison of insulin pen devices and disposable plastic syringes – simplicity, safety, convenience and cost differences |
topic | Diabetes |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5954595/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29922352 http://dx.doi.org/10.17925/EE.2018.14.1.47 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT singhripudaman acomparisonofinsulinpendevicesanddisposableplasticsyringessimplicitysafetyconvenienceandcostdifferences AT samuelclarence acomparisonofinsulinpendevicesanddisposableplasticsyringessimplicitysafetyconvenienceandcostdifferences AT jacobjubbinj acomparisonofinsulinpendevicesanddisposableplasticsyringessimplicitysafetyconvenienceandcostdifferences AT singhripudaman comparisonofinsulinpendevicesanddisposableplasticsyringessimplicitysafetyconvenienceandcostdifferences AT samuelclarence comparisonofinsulinpendevicesanddisposableplasticsyringessimplicitysafetyconvenienceandcostdifferences AT jacobjubbinj comparisonofinsulinpendevicesanddisposableplasticsyringessimplicitysafetyconvenienceandcostdifferences |