Cargando…

Polymicrobial infections: Do bacteria behave differently depending on their neighbours?

Despite the number of examples that correlate interspecies interactions in polymicrobial infections with variations in pathogenicity and antibiotic susceptibility of individual organisms, antibiotic therapies are selected to target the most relevant pathogen, with no consideration of the consequence...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lasa, Iñigo, Solano, Cristina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5955476/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29405827
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21505594.2018.1426520
_version_ 1783323721607413760
author Lasa, Iñigo
Solano, Cristina
author_facet Lasa, Iñigo
Solano, Cristina
author_sort Lasa, Iñigo
collection PubMed
description Despite the number of examples that correlate interspecies interactions in polymicrobial infections with variations in pathogenicity and antibiotic susceptibility of individual organisms, antibiotic therapies are selected to target the most relevant pathogen, with no consideration of the consequences that the presence of other bacterial species may have in the pathogenicity and response to antimicrobial agents. In this issue of Virulence, Garcia-Perez et al. [10] applied replica plating of used wound dressings to assess the topography of distinct S. aureus types in chronic wounds of patients with the genetic blistering disease epidermolysis bullosa, which is characterized by the development of chronic wounds upon simple mechanical trauma. This approach led to the identification of two strains of S. aureus coexisting with Bacillus thuringiensis and Klebsiella oxytoca. S. aureus is highly prevalent in chronic wound infections, whereas B. thuringiensis and K. oxytoca are regarded as opportunistic pathogens. These bacterial species did not inhibit each other's growth under laboratory conditions, suggesting that they do not compete through the production of inhibitory compounds. Using a top-down proteomic approach to explore the inherent relationships between these co-existing bacteria, the exoproteomes of the staphylococcal isolates in monoculture and co-culture with B. thuringiensis or K. oxytoca were characterized by Mass Spectrometry.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5955476
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59554762018-05-21 Polymicrobial infections: Do bacteria behave differently depending on their neighbours? Lasa, Iñigo Solano, Cristina Virulence Editorial Despite the number of examples that correlate interspecies interactions in polymicrobial infections with variations in pathogenicity and antibiotic susceptibility of individual organisms, antibiotic therapies are selected to target the most relevant pathogen, with no consideration of the consequences that the presence of other bacterial species may have in the pathogenicity and response to antimicrobial agents. In this issue of Virulence, Garcia-Perez et al. [10] applied replica plating of used wound dressings to assess the topography of distinct S. aureus types in chronic wounds of patients with the genetic blistering disease epidermolysis bullosa, which is characterized by the development of chronic wounds upon simple mechanical trauma. This approach led to the identification of two strains of S. aureus coexisting with Bacillus thuringiensis and Klebsiella oxytoca. S. aureus is highly prevalent in chronic wound infections, whereas B. thuringiensis and K. oxytoca are regarded as opportunistic pathogens. These bacterial species did not inhibit each other's growth under laboratory conditions, suggesting that they do not compete through the production of inhibitory compounds. Using a top-down proteomic approach to explore the inherent relationships between these co-existing bacteria, the exoproteomes of the staphylococcal isolates in monoculture and co-culture with B. thuringiensis or K. oxytoca were characterized by Mass Spectrometry. Taylor & Francis 2018-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5955476/ /pubmed/29405827 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21505594.2018.1426520 Text en © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Editorial
Lasa, Iñigo
Solano, Cristina
Polymicrobial infections: Do bacteria behave differently depending on their neighbours?
title Polymicrobial infections: Do bacteria behave differently depending on their neighbours?
title_full Polymicrobial infections: Do bacteria behave differently depending on their neighbours?
title_fullStr Polymicrobial infections: Do bacteria behave differently depending on their neighbours?
title_full_unstemmed Polymicrobial infections: Do bacteria behave differently depending on their neighbours?
title_short Polymicrobial infections: Do bacteria behave differently depending on their neighbours?
title_sort polymicrobial infections: do bacteria behave differently depending on their neighbours?
topic Editorial
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5955476/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29405827
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21505594.2018.1426520
work_keys_str_mv AT lasainigo polymicrobialinfectionsdobacteriabehavedifferentlydependingontheirneighbours
AT solanocristina polymicrobialinfectionsdobacteriabehavedifferentlydependingontheirneighbours