Cargando…
A comparative study of RNA-Seq and microarray data analysis on the two examples of rectal-cancer patients and Burkitt Lymphoma cells
BACKGROUND: Pipeline comparisons for gene expression data are highly valuable for applied real data analyses, as they enable the selection of suitable analysis strategies for the dataset at hand. Such pipelines for RNA-Seq data should include mapping of reads, counting and differential gene expressi...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5955523/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29768462 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197162 |
_version_ | 1783323732774748160 |
---|---|
author | Wolff, Alexander Bayerlová, Michaela Gaedcke, Jochen Kube, Dieter Beißbarth, Tim |
author_facet | Wolff, Alexander Bayerlová, Michaela Gaedcke, Jochen Kube, Dieter Beißbarth, Tim |
author_sort | Wolff, Alexander |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Pipeline comparisons for gene expression data are highly valuable for applied real data analyses, as they enable the selection of suitable analysis strategies for the dataset at hand. Such pipelines for RNA-Seq data should include mapping of reads, counting and differential gene expression analysis or preprocessing, normalization and differential gene expression in case of microarray analysis, in order to give a global insight into pipeline performances. METHODS: Four commonly used RNA-Seq pipelines (STAR/HTSeq-Count/edgeR, STAR/RSEM/edgeR, Sailfish/edgeR, TopHat2/Cufflinks/CuffDiff)) were investigated on multiple levels (alignment and counting) and cross-compared with the microarray counterpart on the level of gene expression and gene ontology enrichment. For these comparisons we generated two matched microarray and RNA-Seq datasets: Burkitt Lymphoma cell line data and rectal cancer patient data. RESULTS: The overall mapping rate of STAR was 98.98% for the cell line dataset and 98.49% for the patient dataset. Tophat’s overall mapping rate was 97.02% and 96.73%, respectively, while Sailfish had only an overall mapping rate of 84.81% and 54.44%. The correlation of gene expression in microarray and RNA-Seq data was moderately worse for the patient dataset (ρ = 0.67–0.69) than for the cell line dataset (ρ = 0.87–0.88). An exception were the correlation results of Cufflinks, which were substantially lower (ρ = 0.21–0.29 and 0.34–0.53). For both datasets we identified very low numbers of differentially expressed genes using the microarray platform. For RNA-Seq we checked the agreement of differentially expressed genes identified in the different pipelines and of GO-term enrichment results. CONCLUSION: In conclusion the combination of STAR aligner with HTSeq-Count followed by STAR aligner with RSEM and Sailfish generated differentially expressed genes best suited for the dataset at hand and in agreement with most of the other transcriptomics pipelines. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5955523 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59555232018-05-25 A comparative study of RNA-Seq and microarray data analysis on the two examples of rectal-cancer patients and Burkitt Lymphoma cells Wolff, Alexander Bayerlová, Michaela Gaedcke, Jochen Kube, Dieter Beißbarth, Tim PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Pipeline comparisons for gene expression data are highly valuable for applied real data analyses, as they enable the selection of suitable analysis strategies for the dataset at hand. Such pipelines for RNA-Seq data should include mapping of reads, counting and differential gene expression analysis or preprocessing, normalization and differential gene expression in case of microarray analysis, in order to give a global insight into pipeline performances. METHODS: Four commonly used RNA-Seq pipelines (STAR/HTSeq-Count/edgeR, STAR/RSEM/edgeR, Sailfish/edgeR, TopHat2/Cufflinks/CuffDiff)) were investigated on multiple levels (alignment and counting) and cross-compared with the microarray counterpart on the level of gene expression and gene ontology enrichment. For these comparisons we generated two matched microarray and RNA-Seq datasets: Burkitt Lymphoma cell line data and rectal cancer patient data. RESULTS: The overall mapping rate of STAR was 98.98% for the cell line dataset and 98.49% for the patient dataset. Tophat’s overall mapping rate was 97.02% and 96.73%, respectively, while Sailfish had only an overall mapping rate of 84.81% and 54.44%. The correlation of gene expression in microarray and RNA-Seq data was moderately worse for the patient dataset (ρ = 0.67–0.69) than for the cell line dataset (ρ = 0.87–0.88). An exception were the correlation results of Cufflinks, which were substantially lower (ρ = 0.21–0.29 and 0.34–0.53). For both datasets we identified very low numbers of differentially expressed genes using the microarray platform. For RNA-Seq we checked the agreement of differentially expressed genes identified in the different pipelines and of GO-term enrichment results. CONCLUSION: In conclusion the combination of STAR aligner with HTSeq-Count followed by STAR aligner with RSEM and Sailfish generated differentially expressed genes best suited for the dataset at hand and in agreement with most of the other transcriptomics pipelines. Public Library of Science 2018-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5955523/ /pubmed/29768462 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197162 Text en © 2018 Wolff et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Wolff, Alexander Bayerlová, Michaela Gaedcke, Jochen Kube, Dieter Beißbarth, Tim A comparative study of RNA-Seq and microarray data analysis on the two examples of rectal-cancer patients and Burkitt Lymphoma cells |
title | A comparative study of RNA-Seq and microarray data analysis on the two examples of rectal-cancer patients and Burkitt Lymphoma cells |
title_full | A comparative study of RNA-Seq and microarray data analysis on the two examples of rectal-cancer patients and Burkitt Lymphoma cells |
title_fullStr | A comparative study of RNA-Seq and microarray data analysis on the two examples of rectal-cancer patients and Burkitt Lymphoma cells |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparative study of RNA-Seq and microarray data analysis on the two examples of rectal-cancer patients and Burkitt Lymphoma cells |
title_short | A comparative study of RNA-Seq and microarray data analysis on the two examples of rectal-cancer patients and Burkitt Lymphoma cells |
title_sort | comparative study of rna-seq and microarray data analysis on the two examples of rectal-cancer patients and burkitt lymphoma cells |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5955523/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29768462 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197162 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wolffalexander acomparativestudyofrnaseqandmicroarraydataanalysisonthetwoexamplesofrectalcancerpatientsandburkittlymphomacells AT bayerlovamichaela acomparativestudyofrnaseqandmicroarraydataanalysisonthetwoexamplesofrectalcancerpatientsandburkittlymphomacells AT gaedckejochen acomparativestudyofrnaseqandmicroarraydataanalysisonthetwoexamplesofrectalcancerpatientsandburkittlymphomacells AT kubedieter acomparativestudyofrnaseqandmicroarraydataanalysisonthetwoexamplesofrectalcancerpatientsandburkittlymphomacells AT beißbarthtim acomparativestudyofrnaseqandmicroarraydataanalysisonthetwoexamplesofrectalcancerpatientsandburkittlymphomacells AT wolffalexander comparativestudyofrnaseqandmicroarraydataanalysisonthetwoexamplesofrectalcancerpatientsandburkittlymphomacells AT bayerlovamichaela comparativestudyofrnaseqandmicroarraydataanalysisonthetwoexamplesofrectalcancerpatientsandburkittlymphomacells AT gaedckejochen comparativestudyofrnaseqandmicroarraydataanalysisonthetwoexamplesofrectalcancerpatientsandburkittlymphomacells AT kubedieter comparativestudyofrnaseqandmicroarraydataanalysisonthetwoexamplesofrectalcancerpatientsandburkittlymphomacells AT beißbarthtim comparativestudyofrnaseqandmicroarraydataanalysisonthetwoexamplesofrectalcancerpatientsandburkittlymphomacells |