Cargando…
Unsaturation of vapour pressure inside leaves of two conifer species
Stomatal conductance (g(s)) impacts both photosynthesis and transpiration, and is therefore fundamental to the global carbon and water cycles, food production, and ecosystem services. Mathematical models provide the primary means of analysing this important leaf gas exchange parameter. A nearly univ...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5955884/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29769592 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-25838-2 |
_version_ | 1783323781013438464 |
---|---|
author | Cernusak, Lucas A. Ubierna, Nerea Jenkins, Michael W. Garrity, Steven R. Rahn, Thom Powers, Heath H. Hanson, David T. Sevanto, Sanna Wong, Suan Chin McDowell, Nate G. Farquhar, Graham D. |
author_facet | Cernusak, Lucas A. Ubierna, Nerea Jenkins, Michael W. Garrity, Steven R. Rahn, Thom Powers, Heath H. Hanson, David T. Sevanto, Sanna Wong, Suan Chin McDowell, Nate G. Farquhar, Graham D. |
author_sort | Cernusak, Lucas A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Stomatal conductance (g(s)) impacts both photosynthesis and transpiration, and is therefore fundamental to the global carbon and water cycles, food production, and ecosystem services. Mathematical models provide the primary means of analysing this important leaf gas exchange parameter. A nearly universal assumption in such models is that the vapour pressure inside leaves (e(i)) remains saturated under all conditions. The validity of this assumption has not been well tested, because so far e(i) cannot be measured directly. Here, we test this assumption using a novel technique, based on coupled measurements of leaf gas exchange and the stable isotope compositions of CO(2) and water vapour passing over the leaf. We applied this technique to mature individuals of two semiarid conifer species. In both species, e(i) routinely dropped below saturation when leaves were exposed to moderate to high air vapour pressure deficits. Typical values of relative humidity in the intercellular air spaces were as low 0.9 in Juniperus monosperma and 0.8 in Pinus edulis. These departures of e(i) from saturation caused significant biases in calculations of g(s) and the intercellular CO(2) concentration. Our results refute the longstanding assumption of saturated vapour pressure in plant leaves under all conditions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5955884 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59558842018-05-21 Unsaturation of vapour pressure inside leaves of two conifer species Cernusak, Lucas A. Ubierna, Nerea Jenkins, Michael W. Garrity, Steven R. Rahn, Thom Powers, Heath H. Hanson, David T. Sevanto, Sanna Wong, Suan Chin McDowell, Nate G. Farquhar, Graham D. Sci Rep Article Stomatal conductance (g(s)) impacts both photosynthesis and transpiration, and is therefore fundamental to the global carbon and water cycles, food production, and ecosystem services. Mathematical models provide the primary means of analysing this important leaf gas exchange parameter. A nearly universal assumption in such models is that the vapour pressure inside leaves (e(i)) remains saturated under all conditions. The validity of this assumption has not been well tested, because so far e(i) cannot be measured directly. Here, we test this assumption using a novel technique, based on coupled measurements of leaf gas exchange and the stable isotope compositions of CO(2) and water vapour passing over the leaf. We applied this technique to mature individuals of two semiarid conifer species. In both species, e(i) routinely dropped below saturation when leaves were exposed to moderate to high air vapour pressure deficits. Typical values of relative humidity in the intercellular air spaces were as low 0.9 in Juniperus monosperma and 0.8 in Pinus edulis. These departures of e(i) from saturation caused significant biases in calculations of g(s) and the intercellular CO(2) concentration. Our results refute the longstanding assumption of saturated vapour pressure in plant leaves under all conditions. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5955884/ /pubmed/29769592 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-25838-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Cernusak, Lucas A. Ubierna, Nerea Jenkins, Michael W. Garrity, Steven R. Rahn, Thom Powers, Heath H. Hanson, David T. Sevanto, Sanna Wong, Suan Chin McDowell, Nate G. Farquhar, Graham D. Unsaturation of vapour pressure inside leaves of two conifer species |
title | Unsaturation of vapour pressure inside leaves of two conifer species |
title_full | Unsaturation of vapour pressure inside leaves of two conifer species |
title_fullStr | Unsaturation of vapour pressure inside leaves of two conifer species |
title_full_unstemmed | Unsaturation of vapour pressure inside leaves of two conifer species |
title_short | Unsaturation of vapour pressure inside leaves of two conifer species |
title_sort | unsaturation of vapour pressure inside leaves of two conifer species |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5955884/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29769592 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-25838-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cernusaklucasa unsaturationofvapourpressureinsideleavesoftwoconiferspecies AT ubiernanerea unsaturationofvapourpressureinsideleavesoftwoconiferspecies AT jenkinsmichaelw unsaturationofvapourpressureinsideleavesoftwoconiferspecies AT garritystevenr unsaturationofvapourpressureinsideleavesoftwoconiferspecies AT rahnthom unsaturationofvapourpressureinsideleavesoftwoconiferspecies AT powersheathh unsaturationofvapourpressureinsideleavesoftwoconiferspecies AT hansondavidt unsaturationofvapourpressureinsideleavesoftwoconiferspecies AT sevantosanna unsaturationofvapourpressureinsideleavesoftwoconiferspecies AT wongsuanchin unsaturationofvapourpressureinsideleavesoftwoconiferspecies AT mcdowellnateg unsaturationofvapourpressureinsideleavesoftwoconiferspecies AT farquhargrahamd unsaturationofvapourpressureinsideleavesoftwoconiferspecies |