Cargando…

Analysis of an Attractor Neural Network’s Response to Conflicting External Inputs

The theory of attractor neural networks has been influential in our understanding of the neural processes underlying spatial, declarative, and episodic memory. Many theoretical studies focus on the inherent properties of an attractor, such as its structure and capacity. Relatively little is known ab...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hedrick, Kathryn, Zhang, Kechen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5955911/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29767380
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13408-018-0061-0
_version_ 1783323786941038592
author Hedrick, Kathryn
Zhang, Kechen
author_facet Hedrick, Kathryn
Zhang, Kechen
author_sort Hedrick, Kathryn
collection PubMed
description The theory of attractor neural networks has been influential in our understanding of the neural processes underlying spatial, declarative, and episodic memory. Many theoretical studies focus on the inherent properties of an attractor, such as its structure and capacity. Relatively little is known about how an attractor neural network responds to external inputs, which often carry conflicting information about a stimulus. In this paper we analyze the behavior of an attractor neural network driven by two conflicting external inputs. Our focus is on analyzing the emergent properties of the megamap model, a quasi-continuous attractor network in which place cells are flexibly recombined to represent a large spatial environment. In this model, the system shows a sharp transition from the winner-take-all mode, which is characteristic of standard continuous attractor neural networks, to a combinatorial mode in which the equilibrium activity pattern combines embedded attractor states in response to conflicting external inputs. We derive a numerical test for determining the operational mode of the system a priori. We then derive a linear transformation from the full megamap model with thousands of neurons to a reduced 2-unit model that has similar qualitative behavior. Our analysis of the reduced model and explicit expressions relating the parameters of the reduced model to the megamap elucidate the conditions under which the combinatorial mode emerges and the dynamics in each mode given the relative strength of the attractor network and the relative strength of the two conflicting inputs. Although we focus on a particular attractor network model, we describe a set of conditions under which our analysis can be applied to more general attractor neural networks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5955911
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59559112018-05-24 Analysis of an Attractor Neural Network’s Response to Conflicting External Inputs Hedrick, Kathryn Zhang, Kechen J Math Neurosci Research The theory of attractor neural networks has been influential in our understanding of the neural processes underlying spatial, declarative, and episodic memory. Many theoretical studies focus on the inherent properties of an attractor, such as its structure and capacity. Relatively little is known about how an attractor neural network responds to external inputs, which often carry conflicting information about a stimulus. In this paper we analyze the behavior of an attractor neural network driven by two conflicting external inputs. Our focus is on analyzing the emergent properties of the megamap model, a quasi-continuous attractor network in which place cells are flexibly recombined to represent a large spatial environment. In this model, the system shows a sharp transition from the winner-take-all mode, which is characteristic of standard continuous attractor neural networks, to a combinatorial mode in which the equilibrium activity pattern combines embedded attractor states in response to conflicting external inputs. We derive a numerical test for determining the operational mode of the system a priori. We then derive a linear transformation from the full megamap model with thousands of neurons to a reduced 2-unit model that has similar qualitative behavior. Our analysis of the reduced model and explicit expressions relating the parameters of the reduced model to the megamap elucidate the conditions under which the combinatorial mode emerges and the dynamics in each mode given the relative strength of the attractor network and the relative strength of the two conflicting inputs. Although we focus on a particular attractor network model, we describe a set of conditions under which our analysis can be applied to more general attractor neural networks. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5955911/ /pubmed/29767380 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13408-018-0061-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Hedrick, Kathryn
Zhang, Kechen
Analysis of an Attractor Neural Network’s Response to Conflicting External Inputs
title Analysis of an Attractor Neural Network’s Response to Conflicting External Inputs
title_full Analysis of an Attractor Neural Network’s Response to Conflicting External Inputs
title_fullStr Analysis of an Attractor Neural Network’s Response to Conflicting External Inputs
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of an Attractor Neural Network’s Response to Conflicting External Inputs
title_short Analysis of an Attractor Neural Network’s Response to Conflicting External Inputs
title_sort analysis of an attractor neural network’s response to conflicting external inputs
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5955911/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29767380
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13408-018-0061-0
work_keys_str_mv AT hedrickkathryn analysisofanattractorneuralnetworksresponsetoconflictingexternalinputs
AT zhangkechen analysisofanattractorneuralnetworksresponsetoconflictingexternalinputs