Cargando…
Slow touch targeting CT-fibres does not increase prosocial behaviour in economic laboratory tasks
Field studies have demonstrated that humans become more generous, helpful and compliant after having been touched by another person. Here, we explored whether these effects are larger for touch activating the C-tactile (CT) fibres, as it is ascribed a particular role in establishing and maintaining...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5955966/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29769551 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-25601-7 |
_version_ | 1783323799741005824 |
---|---|
author | Rosenberger, Lisa Anna Ree, Anbjørn Eisenegger, Christoph Sailer, Uta |
author_facet | Rosenberger, Lisa Anna Ree, Anbjørn Eisenegger, Christoph Sailer, Uta |
author_sort | Rosenberger, Lisa Anna |
collection | PubMed |
description | Field studies have demonstrated that humans become more generous, helpful and compliant after having been touched by another person. Here, we explored whether these effects are larger for touch activating the C-tactile (CT) fibres, as it is ascribed a particular role in establishing and maintaining bonds and affiliative interactions. The role of CT-targeted and non-targeted touch on prosocial behaviour was investigated in three different experiments using a trust game and a task measuring individual differences in social value orientations (the SVO task). Whereas participants in general acted prosocially, there was no influence of CT-targeted touch on prosocial behaviour, both in comparison to non-CT-targeted control touch and visual (non-tactile) stimulation. The null findings were further corroborated by Bayesian statistics. Thus, under the controlled laboratory conditions employed, CT-targeted touch did not play a particular role in prosocial behaviour. This indicates that touch does not increase prosocial behaviour in the absence of meaningful social and psychological connotations. Any touch related effects on prosocial behaviour likely depends on the ecological validity of the situation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5955966 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59559662018-05-21 Slow touch targeting CT-fibres does not increase prosocial behaviour in economic laboratory tasks Rosenberger, Lisa Anna Ree, Anbjørn Eisenegger, Christoph Sailer, Uta Sci Rep Article Field studies have demonstrated that humans become more generous, helpful and compliant after having been touched by another person. Here, we explored whether these effects are larger for touch activating the C-tactile (CT) fibres, as it is ascribed a particular role in establishing and maintaining bonds and affiliative interactions. The role of CT-targeted and non-targeted touch on prosocial behaviour was investigated in three different experiments using a trust game and a task measuring individual differences in social value orientations (the SVO task). Whereas participants in general acted prosocially, there was no influence of CT-targeted touch on prosocial behaviour, both in comparison to non-CT-targeted control touch and visual (non-tactile) stimulation. The null findings were further corroborated by Bayesian statistics. Thus, under the controlled laboratory conditions employed, CT-targeted touch did not play a particular role in prosocial behaviour. This indicates that touch does not increase prosocial behaviour in the absence of meaningful social and psychological connotations. Any touch related effects on prosocial behaviour likely depends on the ecological validity of the situation. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5955966/ /pubmed/29769551 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-25601-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Rosenberger, Lisa Anna Ree, Anbjørn Eisenegger, Christoph Sailer, Uta Slow touch targeting CT-fibres does not increase prosocial behaviour in economic laboratory tasks |
title | Slow touch targeting CT-fibres does not increase prosocial behaviour in economic laboratory tasks |
title_full | Slow touch targeting CT-fibres does not increase prosocial behaviour in economic laboratory tasks |
title_fullStr | Slow touch targeting CT-fibres does not increase prosocial behaviour in economic laboratory tasks |
title_full_unstemmed | Slow touch targeting CT-fibres does not increase prosocial behaviour in economic laboratory tasks |
title_short | Slow touch targeting CT-fibres does not increase prosocial behaviour in economic laboratory tasks |
title_sort | slow touch targeting ct-fibres does not increase prosocial behaviour in economic laboratory tasks |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5955966/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29769551 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-25601-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rosenbergerlisaanna slowtouchtargetingctfibresdoesnotincreaseprosocialbehaviourineconomiclaboratorytasks AT reeanbjørn slowtouchtargetingctfibresdoesnotincreaseprosocialbehaviourineconomiclaboratorytasks AT eiseneggerchristoph slowtouchtargetingctfibresdoesnotincreaseprosocialbehaviourineconomiclaboratorytasks AT saileruta slowtouchtargetingctfibresdoesnotincreaseprosocialbehaviourineconomiclaboratorytasks |