Cargando…

War of words: interculturalism v. multiculturalism

This article tackles the relationship between interculturalism and multiculturalism from the points of view of both. Interculturalism owes its existence to a critique of multiculturalism, but of highly distorted visions of it. I distinguish between two versions of interculturalism, a majoritarian (p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Joppke, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5956050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29780693
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40878-018-0079-1
_version_ 1783323818468573184
author Joppke, Christian
author_facet Joppke, Christian
author_sort Joppke, Christian
collection PubMed
description This article tackles the relationship between interculturalism and multiculturalism from the points of view of both. Interculturalism owes its existence to a critique of multiculturalism, but of highly distorted visions of it. I distinguish between two versions of interculturalism, a majoritarian (practiced in Québec) and a post-majoritarian (in Europe), which yield diametrically opposed visions of multiculturalism, as either footloose cosmopolitan or parochial-segregationist. Among the problems of interculturalism is the vacuity of the local as its preferred site of intervention, and its rushed embracing of “diversity” that is also a central plank of neoliberal ideology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5956050
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59560502018-05-18 War of words: interculturalism v. multiculturalism Joppke, Christian Comp Migr Stud Commentary This article tackles the relationship between interculturalism and multiculturalism from the points of view of both. Interculturalism owes its existence to a critique of multiculturalism, but of highly distorted visions of it. I distinguish between two versions of interculturalism, a majoritarian (practiced in Québec) and a post-majoritarian (in Europe), which yield diametrically opposed visions of multiculturalism, as either footloose cosmopolitan or parochial-segregationist. Among the problems of interculturalism is the vacuity of the local as its preferred site of intervention, and its rushed embracing of “diversity” that is also a central plank of neoliberal ideology. Springer International Publishing 2018-05-17 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5956050/ /pubmed/29780693 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40878-018-0079-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Commentary
Joppke, Christian
War of words: interculturalism v. multiculturalism
title War of words: interculturalism v. multiculturalism
title_full War of words: interculturalism v. multiculturalism
title_fullStr War of words: interculturalism v. multiculturalism
title_full_unstemmed War of words: interculturalism v. multiculturalism
title_short War of words: interculturalism v. multiculturalism
title_sort war of words: interculturalism v. multiculturalism
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5956050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29780693
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40878-018-0079-1
work_keys_str_mv AT joppkechristian warofwordsinterculturalismvmulticulturalism