Cargando…

Is the post-multicultural era pro-diversity?

This commentary discusses the claim of Zapata-Barrero that Western countries have historically entered a ‘post multicultural’ phase, in which the emergence of the intercultural policy paradigm must be placed. It argues that this claim is mistaken, or at least too imprecise, and a potential danger fo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: de Waal, Tamar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5956051/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29780696
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40878-018-0084-4
_version_ 1783323818688774144
author de Waal, Tamar
author_facet de Waal, Tamar
author_sort de Waal, Tamar
collection PubMed
description This commentary discusses the claim of Zapata-Barrero that Western countries have historically entered a ‘post multicultural’ phase, in which the emergence of the intercultural policy paradigm must be placed. It argues that this claim is mistaken, or at least too imprecise, and a potential danger for any pro-diversity management strategy, including interculturalism. Moreover, it is highlighted that Zapata-Barrero acknowledges that the contrast between intercultural and multicultural strategies has been overstated in the intercultural literature and that they are in fact complementary. For this reason, instead of reaffirming that interculturalism is temporally post multiculturalism, we should work towards creative synthesis of intercultural and multicultural strategies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5956051
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59560512018-05-18 Is the post-multicultural era pro-diversity? de Waal, Tamar Comp Migr Stud Commentary This commentary discusses the claim of Zapata-Barrero that Western countries have historically entered a ‘post multicultural’ phase, in which the emergence of the intercultural policy paradigm must be placed. It argues that this claim is mistaken, or at least too imprecise, and a potential danger for any pro-diversity management strategy, including interculturalism. Moreover, it is highlighted that Zapata-Barrero acknowledges that the contrast between intercultural and multicultural strategies has been overstated in the intercultural literature and that they are in fact complementary. For this reason, instead of reaffirming that interculturalism is temporally post multiculturalism, we should work towards creative synthesis of intercultural and multicultural strategies. Springer International Publishing 2018-05-17 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5956051/ /pubmed/29780696 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40878-018-0084-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Commentary
de Waal, Tamar
Is the post-multicultural era pro-diversity?
title Is the post-multicultural era pro-diversity?
title_full Is the post-multicultural era pro-diversity?
title_fullStr Is the post-multicultural era pro-diversity?
title_full_unstemmed Is the post-multicultural era pro-diversity?
title_short Is the post-multicultural era pro-diversity?
title_sort is the post-multicultural era pro-diversity?
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5956051/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29780696
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40878-018-0084-4
work_keys_str_mv AT dewaaltamar isthepostmulticulturaleraprodiversity