Cargando…
Philosophy of Science: How to Identify the Potential Research for the Day after Tomorrow?
We were asked to participate in a workshop to assist the European Commission on how to choose financial support for high-potential, basic research projects that can give new scientific breakthroughs and thus contribute significantly to the positive development of society, industry, and economy for t...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
TheScientificWorldJOURNAL
2004
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5956452/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15258674 http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2004.103 |
_version_ | 1783323896242503680 |
---|---|
author | Ventegodt, Søren Merrick, Joav |
author_facet | Ventegodt, Søren Merrick, Joav |
author_sort | Ventegodt, Søren |
collection | PubMed |
description | We were asked to participate in a workshop to assist the European Commission on how to choose financial support for high-potential, basic research projects that can give new scientific breakthroughs and thus contribute significantly to the positive development of society, industry, and economy for the day after tomorrow. At this workshop, we analyzed the problem in some detail using experience from our own research on the global quality of life. We would suggest that the most promising projects have the following characteristics: (1) they are led by a brilliant researcher who considers his/her research to be “sweet science”, who wants to explain the anomalies of his/her field of science, and who lives in a nonmainstream scientific paradigm; (2) they are deeply engaged in the philosophical problems of their research field, they are searching eagerly for a new understanding and a new theory, giving new tools for measurement and creating change, and results are taken as feedback on all levels from tool to theory and philosophy; (3) they are focused on the key point(s), which is an essential feature of the universe that creates global change if intervened upon. At the NEST Pathfinder 2005 Topic Identification Workshop, Brussels 28 May 2004 entitled “Measuring the Impossible”, we advised the European Commission Research Directorate to allocate funds for projects focusing on the state of consciousness — how to understand it, how to map it, and how to develop it. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5956452 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2004 |
publisher | TheScientificWorldJOURNAL |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59564522018-06-03 Philosophy of Science: How to Identify the Potential Research for the Day after Tomorrow? Ventegodt, Søren Merrick, Joav ScientificWorldJournal Short Review We were asked to participate in a workshop to assist the European Commission on how to choose financial support for high-potential, basic research projects that can give new scientific breakthroughs and thus contribute significantly to the positive development of society, industry, and economy for the day after tomorrow. At this workshop, we analyzed the problem in some detail using experience from our own research on the global quality of life. We would suggest that the most promising projects have the following characteristics: (1) they are led by a brilliant researcher who considers his/her research to be “sweet science”, who wants to explain the anomalies of his/her field of science, and who lives in a nonmainstream scientific paradigm; (2) they are deeply engaged in the philosophical problems of their research field, they are searching eagerly for a new understanding and a new theory, giving new tools for measurement and creating change, and results are taken as feedback on all levels from tool to theory and philosophy; (3) they are focused on the key point(s), which is an essential feature of the universe that creates global change if intervened upon. At the NEST Pathfinder 2005 Topic Identification Workshop, Brussels 28 May 2004 entitled “Measuring the Impossible”, we advised the European Commission Research Directorate to allocate funds for projects focusing on the state of consciousness — how to understand it, how to map it, and how to develop it. TheScientificWorldJOURNAL 2004-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5956452/ /pubmed/15258674 http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2004.103 Text en Copyright © 2004 Soren Ventegodt and Joav Merrick. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Short Review Ventegodt, Søren Merrick, Joav Philosophy of Science: How to Identify the Potential Research for the Day after Tomorrow? |
title | Philosophy of Science: How to Identify the Potential Research for the Day after Tomorrow? |
title_full | Philosophy of Science: How to Identify the Potential Research for the Day after Tomorrow? |
title_fullStr | Philosophy of Science: How to Identify the Potential Research for the Day after Tomorrow? |
title_full_unstemmed | Philosophy of Science: How to Identify the Potential Research for the Day after Tomorrow? |
title_short | Philosophy of Science: How to Identify the Potential Research for the Day after Tomorrow? |
title_sort | philosophy of science: how to identify the potential research for the day after tomorrow? |
topic | Short Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5956452/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15258674 http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2004.103 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ventegodtsøren philosophyofsciencehowtoidentifythepotentialresearchforthedayaftertomorrow AT merrickjoav philosophyofsciencehowtoidentifythepotentialresearchforthedayaftertomorrow |