Cargando…

Osteogenesis and Morphology of the Peri-Implant Bone Facing Dental Implants

This study investigated the influence of different implant surfaces on peri-implant osteogenesis and implant face morphology of peri-implant tissues during the early (2 weeks) and complete healing period (3 months). Thirty endosseous titanium implants (conic screws) with differently treated surfaces...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Franchi, Marco, Orsini, Ester, Triré, Alessandra, Quaranta, Marilisa, Martini, Desirée, Piccari, Gabriella Giuliani, Ruggeri, Alessandro, Ottani, Vittoria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: TheScientificWorldJOURNAL 2004
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5956490/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15632988
http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2004.211
_version_ 1783323905042153472
author Franchi, Marco
Orsini, Ester
Triré, Alessandra
Quaranta, Marilisa
Martini, Desirée
Piccari, Gabriella Giuliani
Ruggeri, Alessandro
Ottani, Vittoria
author_facet Franchi, Marco
Orsini, Ester
Triré, Alessandra
Quaranta, Marilisa
Martini, Desirée
Piccari, Gabriella Giuliani
Ruggeri, Alessandro
Ottani, Vittoria
author_sort Franchi, Marco
collection PubMed
description This study investigated the influence of different implant surfaces on peri-implant osteogenesis and implant face morphology of peri-implant tissues during the early (2 weeks) and complete healing period (3 months). Thirty endosseous titanium implants (conic screws) with differently treated surfaces (smooth titanium = SS, titanium plasma sprayed = TPS, sand-blasted zirconium oxide = Zr-SLA) were implanted in femur and tibiae diaphyses of two mongrel sheep. Histological sections of the implants and surrounding tissues obtained by sawing and grinding techniques were observed under light microscopy (LM). The peri-implant tissues of other samples were mechanically detached from the corresponding implants to be processed for SEM observation. Two weeks after implantation, we observed osteogenesis (new bone trabeculae) around all implant surfaces only where a gap was present at the host bone-metal interface. No evident bone deposition was detectable where threads of the screws were in direct contact with the compact host bone. Distance osteogenesis predominated in SS implants, while around rough surfaces (TPS and Zr-SLA), both distance and contact osteogenesis were present. At SEM analysis 2 weeks after implantation, the implant face of SS peri-implant tissue showed few, thin, newly formed, bone trabeculae immersed in large, loose, marrow tissue with blood vessels. Around the TPS screws, the implant face of the peri-implant tissue was rather irregular because of the rougher metal surface. Zr-SLA screws showed more numerous, newly formed bone trabeculae crossing marrow spaces and also needle-like crystals in bone nodules indicating an active mineralising process. After 3 months, all the screws appeared osseointegrated, being almost completely covered by a compact, mature, newly formed bone. However, some marrow spaces rich in blood vessels and undifferentiated cells were in contact with the metal surface. By SEM analysis, the implant face of the peri-implant tissue showed different results. Around the SS screws, the compact bone with areas of different mineralisation rate appeared very smooth, while around the rougher TPS screws, the bone still showed an irregular surface corresponding to the implant macro/microroughness. Around the Zr-SLA screws, a more regular implant-bone surface and sparse, calcified marrow spaces were detectable.Results from this research suggest that 2 weeks after implantation, trabecular bone represents the calcified healing tissue, which supports the early biological fixation of the implants. The peri-implant marrow spaces, rich in undifferentiated cells and blood vasculature, observed both 2 weeks and 3 months after surgery, favour the biological turnover of both early and mature peri-implant bone. The implant surface morphology strongly influences the rate and the modality of peri-implant osteogenesis, as do the morphology and arrangement of the implant face in peri-implant bone both during early healing (after 2 weeks) and when the implant is just osseointegrated; rough surfaces, and in particular Zr-SLA, seem to better favour bone deposition on the metal surface.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5956490
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2004
publisher TheScientificWorldJOURNAL
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59564902018-06-03 Osteogenesis and Morphology of the Peri-Implant Bone Facing Dental Implants Franchi, Marco Orsini, Ester Triré, Alessandra Quaranta, Marilisa Martini, Desirée Piccari, Gabriella Giuliani Ruggeri, Alessandro Ottani, Vittoria ScientificWorldJournal Research Article This study investigated the influence of different implant surfaces on peri-implant osteogenesis and implant face morphology of peri-implant tissues during the early (2 weeks) and complete healing period (3 months). Thirty endosseous titanium implants (conic screws) with differently treated surfaces (smooth titanium = SS, titanium plasma sprayed = TPS, sand-blasted zirconium oxide = Zr-SLA) were implanted in femur and tibiae diaphyses of two mongrel sheep. Histological sections of the implants and surrounding tissues obtained by sawing and grinding techniques were observed under light microscopy (LM). The peri-implant tissues of other samples were mechanically detached from the corresponding implants to be processed for SEM observation. Two weeks after implantation, we observed osteogenesis (new bone trabeculae) around all implant surfaces only where a gap was present at the host bone-metal interface. No evident bone deposition was detectable where threads of the screws were in direct contact with the compact host bone. Distance osteogenesis predominated in SS implants, while around rough surfaces (TPS and Zr-SLA), both distance and contact osteogenesis were present. At SEM analysis 2 weeks after implantation, the implant face of SS peri-implant tissue showed few, thin, newly formed, bone trabeculae immersed in large, loose, marrow tissue with blood vessels. Around the TPS screws, the implant face of the peri-implant tissue was rather irregular because of the rougher metal surface. Zr-SLA screws showed more numerous, newly formed bone trabeculae crossing marrow spaces and also needle-like crystals in bone nodules indicating an active mineralising process. After 3 months, all the screws appeared osseointegrated, being almost completely covered by a compact, mature, newly formed bone. However, some marrow spaces rich in blood vessels and undifferentiated cells were in contact with the metal surface. By SEM analysis, the implant face of the peri-implant tissue showed different results. Around the SS screws, the compact bone with areas of different mineralisation rate appeared very smooth, while around the rougher TPS screws, the bone still showed an irregular surface corresponding to the implant macro/microroughness. Around the Zr-SLA screws, a more regular implant-bone surface and sparse, calcified marrow spaces were detectable.Results from this research suggest that 2 weeks after implantation, trabecular bone represents the calcified healing tissue, which supports the early biological fixation of the implants. The peri-implant marrow spaces, rich in undifferentiated cells and blood vasculature, observed both 2 weeks and 3 months after surgery, favour the biological turnover of both early and mature peri-implant bone. The implant surface morphology strongly influences the rate and the modality of peri-implant osteogenesis, as do the morphology and arrangement of the implant face in peri-implant bone both during early healing (after 2 weeks) and when the implant is just osseointegrated; rough surfaces, and in particular Zr-SLA, seem to better favour bone deposition on the metal surface. TheScientificWorldJOURNAL 2004-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5956490/ /pubmed/15632988 http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2004.211 Text en Copyright © 2004 Marco Franchi et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Franchi, Marco
Orsini, Ester
Triré, Alessandra
Quaranta, Marilisa
Martini, Desirée
Piccari, Gabriella Giuliani
Ruggeri, Alessandro
Ottani, Vittoria
Osteogenesis and Morphology of the Peri-Implant Bone Facing Dental Implants
title Osteogenesis and Morphology of the Peri-Implant Bone Facing Dental Implants
title_full Osteogenesis and Morphology of the Peri-Implant Bone Facing Dental Implants
title_fullStr Osteogenesis and Morphology of the Peri-Implant Bone Facing Dental Implants
title_full_unstemmed Osteogenesis and Morphology of the Peri-Implant Bone Facing Dental Implants
title_short Osteogenesis and Morphology of the Peri-Implant Bone Facing Dental Implants
title_sort osteogenesis and morphology of the peri-implant bone facing dental implants
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5956490/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15632988
http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2004.211
work_keys_str_mv AT franchimarco osteogenesisandmorphologyoftheperiimplantbonefacingdentalimplants
AT orsiniester osteogenesisandmorphologyoftheperiimplantbonefacingdentalimplants
AT trirealessandra osteogenesisandmorphologyoftheperiimplantbonefacingdentalimplants
AT quarantamarilisa osteogenesisandmorphologyoftheperiimplantbonefacingdentalimplants
AT martinidesiree osteogenesisandmorphologyoftheperiimplantbonefacingdentalimplants
AT piccarigabriellagiuliani osteogenesisandmorphologyoftheperiimplantbonefacingdentalimplants
AT ruggerialessandro osteogenesisandmorphologyoftheperiimplantbonefacingdentalimplants
AT ottanivittoria osteogenesisandmorphologyoftheperiimplantbonefacingdentalimplants