Cargando…

A new strategy for volumetric-modulated arc therapy planning using AutoPlanning based multicriteria optimization for nasopharyngeal carcinoma

BACKGROUND: A new strategy for making the appropriate choice of the representative optimization parameters in planning processes and accurate selection criteria during Pareto surface navigation for general multicriteria optimization (MCO) was recommended in the study. The purpose was to combine both...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Juanqi, Chen, Zhi, Li, Weiwei, Qian, Wei, Wang, Xiaosheng, Hu, Weigang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5956620/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29769101
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-018-1042-x
_version_ 1783323921187078144
author Wang, Juanqi
Chen, Zhi
Li, Weiwei
Qian, Wei
Wang, Xiaosheng
Hu, Weigang
author_facet Wang, Juanqi
Chen, Zhi
Li, Weiwei
Qian, Wei
Wang, Xiaosheng
Hu, Weigang
author_sort Wang, Juanqi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A new strategy for making the appropriate choice of the representative optimization parameters in planning processes and accurate selection criteria during Pareto surface navigation for general multicriteria optimization (MCO) was recommended in the study. The purpose was to combine both benefits of AutoPlanning optimization and MCO (APMCO) for achieving an individual volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plan according to the clinically achieved patient-specific tradeoff among conflicting priorities. The preclinical investigation of this optimization approach for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) radiotherapy was performed and compared to general MCO VMAT. METHODS: A total of 60 NPC patients with various stages were enrolled in this study. General MCO and APMCO plans were generated for each patient on the treatment planning system. The differences between two planning schemes were evaluated and compared. RESULTS: All plans were capable of achieving the prescription requirement. The planning target volume coverage and conformation number were remarkably similar between general MCO and APMCO plans. There were no significant differences in most of organs at risk (OARs) sparing. However, in APMCO plans, relatively remarkable decreases were observed in the mean dose (D(mean)) to the glottic larynx and pharyngeal constrictor muscles. The reductions of average D(mean) to the two OARs were 10.5% (p < 0.0001) and 8.4% (p < 0.0001), respectively. APMCO technique was found to increase the planning time for an average of approximately 5 h and did not lead to a significant increase of monitor units compared to general MCO. CONCLUSIONS: The potential of the APMCO strategy is best realized with a clinical implementation that exploits individual generation of Pareto surface representations without manual interaction. It also assists physicians to ensure navigation in a more efficient and straightforward manner.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5956620
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59566202018-05-24 A new strategy for volumetric-modulated arc therapy planning using AutoPlanning based multicriteria optimization for nasopharyngeal carcinoma Wang, Juanqi Chen, Zhi Li, Weiwei Qian, Wei Wang, Xiaosheng Hu, Weigang Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: A new strategy for making the appropriate choice of the representative optimization parameters in planning processes and accurate selection criteria during Pareto surface navigation for general multicriteria optimization (MCO) was recommended in the study. The purpose was to combine both benefits of AutoPlanning optimization and MCO (APMCO) for achieving an individual volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plan according to the clinically achieved patient-specific tradeoff among conflicting priorities. The preclinical investigation of this optimization approach for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) radiotherapy was performed and compared to general MCO VMAT. METHODS: A total of 60 NPC patients with various stages were enrolled in this study. General MCO and APMCO plans were generated for each patient on the treatment planning system. The differences between two planning schemes were evaluated and compared. RESULTS: All plans were capable of achieving the prescription requirement. The planning target volume coverage and conformation number were remarkably similar between general MCO and APMCO plans. There were no significant differences in most of organs at risk (OARs) sparing. However, in APMCO plans, relatively remarkable decreases were observed in the mean dose (D(mean)) to the glottic larynx and pharyngeal constrictor muscles. The reductions of average D(mean) to the two OARs were 10.5% (p < 0.0001) and 8.4% (p < 0.0001), respectively. APMCO technique was found to increase the planning time for an average of approximately 5 h and did not lead to a significant increase of monitor units compared to general MCO. CONCLUSIONS: The potential of the APMCO strategy is best realized with a clinical implementation that exploits individual generation of Pareto surface representations without manual interaction. It also assists physicians to ensure navigation in a more efficient and straightforward manner. BioMed Central 2018-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5956620/ /pubmed/29769101 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-018-1042-x Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Wang, Juanqi
Chen, Zhi
Li, Weiwei
Qian, Wei
Wang, Xiaosheng
Hu, Weigang
A new strategy for volumetric-modulated arc therapy planning using AutoPlanning based multicriteria optimization for nasopharyngeal carcinoma
title A new strategy for volumetric-modulated arc therapy planning using AutoPlanning based multicriteria optimization for nasopharyngeal carcinoma
title_full A new strategy for volumetric-modulated arc therapy planning using AutoPlanning based multicriteria optimization for nasopharyngeal carcinoma
title_fullStr A new strategy for volumetric-modulated arc therapy planning using AutoPlanning based multicriteria optimization for nasopharyngeal carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed A new strategy for volumetric-modulated arc therapy planning using AutoPlanning based multicriteria optimization for nasopharyngeal carcinoma
title_short A new strategy for volumetric-modulated arc therapy planning using AutoPlanning based multicriteria optimization for nasopharyngeal carcinoma
title_sort new strategy for volumetric-modulated arc therapy planning using autoplanning based multicriteria optimization for nasopharyngeal carcinoma
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5956620/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29769101
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-018-1042-x
work_keys_str_mv AT wangjuanqi anewstrategyforvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyplanningusingautoplanningbasedmulticriteriaoptimizationfornasopharyngealcarcinoma
AT chenzhi anewstrategyforvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyplanningusingautoplanningbasedmulticriteriaoptimizationfornasopharyngealcarcinoma
AT liweiwei anewstrategyforvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyplanningusingautoplanningbasedmulticriteriaoptimizationfornasopharyngealcarcinoma
AT qianwei anewstrategyforvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyplanningusingautoplanningbasedmulticriteriaoptimizationfornasopharyngealcarcinoma
AT wangxiaosheng anewstrategyforvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyplanningusingautoplanningbasedmulticriteriaoptimizationfornasopharyngealcarcinoma
AT huweigang anewstrategyforvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyplanningusingautoplanningbasedmulticriteriaoptimizationfornasopharyngealcarcinoma
AT wangjuanqi newstrategyforvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyplanningusingautoplanningbasedmulticriteriaoptimizationfornasopharyngealcarcinoma
AT chenzhi newstrategyforvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyplanningusingautoplanningbasedmulticriteriaoptimizationfornasopharyngealcarcinoma
AT liweiwei newstrategyforvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyplanningusingautoplanningbasedmulticriteriaoptimizationfornasopharyngealcarcinoma
AT qianwei newstrategyforvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyplanningusingautoplanningbasedmulticriteriaoptimizationfornasopharyngealcarcinoma
AT wangxiaosheng newstrategyforvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyplanningusingautoplanningbasedmulticriteriaoptimizationfornasopharyngealcarcinoma
AT huweigang newstrategyforvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyplanningusingautoplanningbasedmulticriteriaoptimizationfornasopharyngealcarcinoma