Cargando…

Why do patients decline amniocentesis? Analysis of factors influencing the decision to refuse invasive prenatal testing

BACKGROUND: In recent years, determination of personalized risk for fetal chromosomal anomalies emerged as an important component of prenatal genetic counseling. Women in whom fetal risk for chromosomal aberrations is elevated are offered further testing. The aim of this study was to identify factor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sadlecki, Pawel, Grabiec, Marek, Walentowicz, Pawel, Walentowicz-Sadlecka, Malgorzata
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5956945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29769050
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-1812-3
_version_ 1783323980692717568
author Sadlecki, Pawel
Grabiec, Marek
Walentowicz, Pawel
Walentowicz-Sadlecka, Malgorzata
author_facet Sadlecki, Pawel
Grabiec, Marek
Walentowicz, Pawel
Walentowicz-Sadlecka, Malgorzata
author_sort Sadlecki, Pawel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In recent years, determination of personalized risk for fetal chromosomal anomalies emerged as an important component of prenatal genetic counseling. Women in whom fetal risk for chromosomal aberrations is elevated are offered further testing. The aim of this study was to identify factors that may influence the decision to refuse invasive prenatal testing aimed at determination of fetal karyotype in a group of patients at increased risk of trisomy 21. METHODS: The analysis included 177 patients with singleton pregnancy, whose personalized risk score for trisomy 21 calculated on the basis of the combined test exceeded 1:300. Diagnostic amniocentesis was performed in 125 patients from this subset, since the remaining 52 women declined invasive prenatal testing. The following factors were analyzed as potential determinants of the decision to refuse amniocentesis: maternal age (≥35 years), gravidity, number of miscarriages in previous pregnancies, educational status, marital status, indications to prenatal testing, gestational age at the time of prenatal testing, personalized risk score for fetal chromosomal aberrations and nuchal translucency (NT) value. RESULTS: A statistically significant relationship was found between the decision to refuse amniocentesis and the number of previous miscarriages, maternal educational level, NT values and personalized risk score for fetal chromosomal aberrations. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified primary maternal education and history of more than two miscarriages as independent significant predictors of declining amniocentesis. Women with personalized risk scores for trisomy 21 greater than 1:100 opted out of invasive prenatal diagnosis significantly less often than the remaining participants. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the key role of high quality and accuracy of non-invasive diagnostic tests conducted in the first trimester should be emphasized as personalized risk score for fetal chromosomal aberrations determined based on their results is pivotal for further management of pregnancy. Equally important is to provide the patients with an accurate and comprehensible information about potential benefits and risks of invasive testing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5956945
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59569452018-05-24 Why do patients decline amniocentesis? Analysis of factors influencing the decision to refuse invasive prenatal testing Sadlecki, Pawel Grabiec, Marek Walentowicz, Pawel Walentowicz-Sadlecka, Malgorzata BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: In recent years, determination of personalized risk for fetal chromosomal anomalies emerged as an important component of prenatal genetic counseling. Women in whom fetal risk for chromosomal aberrations is elevated are offered further testing. The aim of this study was to identify factors that may influence the decision to refuse invasive prenatal testing aimed at determination of fetal karyotype in a group of patients at increased risk of trisomy 21. METHODS: The analysis included 177 patients with singleton pregnancy, whose personalized risk score for trisomy 21 calculated on the basis of the combined test exceeded 1:300. Diagnostic amniocentesis was performed in 125 patients from this subset, since the remaining 52 women declined invasive prenatal testing. The following factors were analyzed as potential determinants of the decision to refuse amniocentesis: maternal age (≥35 years), gravidity, number of miscarriages in previous pregnancies, educational status, marital status, indications to prenatal testing, gestational age at the time of prenatal testing, personalized risk score for fetal chromosomal aberrations and nuchal translucency (NT) value. RESULTS: A statistically significant relationship was found between the decision to refuse amniocentesis and the number of previous miscarriages, maternal educational level, NT values and personalized risk score for fetal chromosomal aberrations. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified primary maternal education and history of more than two miscarriages as independent significant predictors of declining amniocentesis. Women with personalized risk scores for trisomy 21 greater than 1:100 opted out of invasive prenatal diagnosis significantly less often than the remaining participants. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the key role of high quality and accuracy of non-invasive diagnostic tests conducted in the first trimester should be emphasized as personalized risk score for fetal chromosomal aberrations determined based on their results is pivotal for further management of pregnancy. Equally important is to provide the patients with an accurate and comprehensible information about potential benefits and risks of invasive testing. BioMed Central 2018-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5956945/ /pubmed/29769050 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-1812-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sadlecki, Pawel
Grabiec, Marek
Walentowicz, Pawel
Walentowicz-Sadlecka, Malgorzata
Why do patients decline amniocentesis? Analysis of factors influencing the decision to refuse invasive prenatal testing
title Why do patients decline amniocentesis? Analysis of factors influencing the decision to refuse invasive prenatal testing
title_full Why do patients decline amniocentesis? Analysis of factors influencing the decision to refuse invasive prenatal testing
title_fullStr Why do patients decline amniocentesis? Analysis of factors influencing the decision to refuse invasive prenatal testing
title_full_unstemmed Why do patients decline amniocentesis? Analysis of factors influencing the decision to refuse invasive prenatal testing
title_short Why do patients decline amniocentesis? Analysis of factors influencing the decision to refuse invasive prenatal testing
title_sort why do patients decline amniocentesis? analysis of factors influencing the decision to refuse invasive prenatal testing
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5956945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29769050
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-1812-3
work_keys_str_mv AT sadleckipawel whydopatientsdeclineamniocentesisanalysisoffactorsinfluencingthedecisiontorefuseinvasiveprenataltesting
AT grabiecmarek whydopatientsdeclineamniocentesisanalysisoffactorsinfluencingthedecisiontorefuseinvasiveprenataltesting
AT walentowiczpawel whydopatientsdeclineamniocentesisanalysisoffactorsinfluencingthedecisiontorefuseinvasiveprenataltesting
AT walentowiczsadleckamalgorzata whydopatientsdeclineamniocentesisanalysisoffactorsinfluencingthedecisiontorefuseinvasiveprenataltesting