Cargando…
Academic information on Twitter: A user survey
Although counts of tweets citing academic papers are used as an informal indicator of interest, little is known about who tweets academic papers and who uses Twitter to find scholarly information. Without knowing this, it is difficult to draw useful conclusions from a publication being frequently tw...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5957360/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29771947 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197265 |
_version_ | 1783324047657926656 |
---|---|
author | Mohammadi, Ehsan Thelwall, Mike Kwasny, Mary Holmes, Kristi L. |
author_facet | Mohammadi, Ehsan Thelwall, Mike Kwasny, Mary Holmes, Kristi L. |
author_sort | Mohammadi, Ehsan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Although counts of tweets citing academic papers are used as an informal indicator of interest, little is known about who tweets academic papers and who uses Twitter to find scholarly information. Without knowing this, it is difficult to draw useful conclusions from a publication being frequently tweeted. This study surveyed 1,912 users that have tweeted journal articles to ask about their scholarly-related Twitter uses. Almost half of the respondents (45%) did not work in academia, despite the sample probably being biased towards academics. Twitter was used most by people with a social science or humanities background. People tend to leverage social ties on Twitter to find information rather than searching for relevant tweets. Twitter is used in academia to acquire and share real-time information and to develop connections with others. Motivations for using Twitter vary by discipline, occupation, and employment sector, but not much by gender. These factors also influence the sharing of different types of academic information. This study provides evidence that Twitter plays a significant role in the discovery of scholarly information and cross-disciplinary knowledge spreading. Most importantly, the large numbers of non-academic users support the claims of those using tweet counts as evidence for the non-academic impacts of scholarly research. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5957360 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59573602018-05-31 Academic information on Twitter: A user survey Mohammadi, Ehsan Thelwall, Mike Kwasny, Mary Holmes, Kristi L. PLoS One Research Article Although counts of tweets citing academic papers are used as an informal indicator of interest, little is known about who tweets academic papers and who uses Twitter to find scholarly information. Without knowing this, it is difficult to draw useful conclusions from a publication being frequently tweeted. This study surveyed 1,912 users that have tweeted journal articles to ask about their scholarly-related Twitter uses. Almost half of the respondents (45%) did not work in academia, despite the sample probably being biased towards academics. Twitter was used most by people with a social science or humanities background. People tend to leverage social ties on Twitter to find information rather than searching for relevant tweets. Twitter is used in academia to acquire and share real-time information and to develop connections with others. Motivations for using Twitter vary by discipline, occupation, and employment sector, but not much by gender. These factors also influence the sharing of different types of academic information. This study provides evidence that Twitter plays a significant role in the discovery of scholarly information and cross-disciplinary knowledge spreading. Most importantly, the large numbers of non-academic users support the claims of those using tweet counts as evidence for the non-academic impacts of scholarly research. Public Library of Science 2018-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5957360/ /pubmed/29771947 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197265 Text en © 2018 Mohammadi et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Mohammadi, Ehsan Thelwall, Mike Kwasny, Mary Holmes, Kristi L. Academic information on Twitter: A user survey |
title | Academic information on Twitter: A user survey |
title_full | Academic information on Twitter: A user survey |
title_fullStr | Academic information on Twitter: A user survey |
title_full_unstemmed | Academic information on Twitter: A user survey |
title_short | Academic information on Twitter: A user survey |
title_sort | academic information on twitter: a user survey |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5957360/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29771947 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197265 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mohammadiehsan academicinformationontwitterausersurvey AT thelwallmike academicinformationontwitterausersurvey AT kwasnymary academicinformationontwitterausersurvey AT holmeskristil academicinformationontwitterausersurvey |