Cargando…

Academic information on Twitter: A user survey

Although counts of tweets citing academic papers are used as an informal indicator of interest, little is known about who tweets academic papers and who uses Twitter to find scholarly information. Without knowing this, it is difficult to draw useful conclusions from a publication being frequently tw...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mohammadi, Ehsan, Thelwall, Mike, Kwasny, Mary, Holmes, Kristi L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5957360/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29771947
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197265
_version_ 1783324047657926656
author Mohammadi, Ehsan
Thelwall, Mike
Kwasny, Mary
Holmes, Kristi L.
author_facet Mohammadi, Ehsan
Thelwall, Mike
Kwasny, Mary
Holmes, Kristi L.
author_sort Mohammadi, Ehsan
collection PubMed
description Although counts of tweets citing academic papers are used as an informal indicator of interest, little is known about who tweets academic papers and who uses Twitter to find scholarly information. Without knowing this, it is difficult to draw useful conclusions from a publication being frequently tweeted. This study surveyed 1,912 users that have tweeted journal articles to ask about their scholarly-related Twitter uses. Almost half of the respondents (45%) did not work in academia, despite the sample probably being biased towards academics. Twitter was used most by people with a social science or humanities background. People tend to leverage social ties on Twitter to find information rather than searching for relevant tweets. Twitter is used in academia to acquire and share real-time information and to develop connections with others. Motivations for using Twitter vary by discipline, occupation, and employment sector, but not much by gender. These factors also influence the sharing of different types of academic information. This study provides evidence that Twitter plays a significant role in the discovery of scholarly information and cross-disciplinary knowledge spreading. Most importantly, the large numbers of non-academic users support the claims of those using tweet counts as evidence for the non-academic impacts of scholarly research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5957360
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59573602018-05-31 Academic information on Twitter: A user survey Mohammadi, Ehsan Thelwall, Mike Kwasny, Mary Holmes, Kristi L. PLoS One Research Article Although counts of tweets citing academic papers are used as an informal indicator of interest, little is known about who tweets academic papers and who uses Twitter to find scholarly information. Without knowing this, it is difficult to draw useful conclusions from a publication being frequently tweeted. This study surveyed 1,912 users that have tweeted journal articles to ask about their scholarly-related Twitter uses. Almost half of the respondents (45%) did not work in academia, despite the sample probably being biased towards academics. Twitter was used most by people with a social science or humanities background. People tend to leverage social ties on Twitter to find information rather than searching for relevant tweets. Twitter is used in academia to acquire and share real-time information and to develop connections with others. Motivations for using Twitter vary by discipline, occupation, and employment sector, but not much by gender. These factors also influence the sharing of different types of academic information. This study provides evidence that Twitter plays a significant role in the discovery of scholarly information and cross-disciplinary knowledge spreading. Most importantly, the large numbers of non-academic users support the claims of those using tweet counts as evidence for the non-academic impacts of scholarly research. Public Library of Science 2018-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5957360/ /pubmed/29771947 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197265 Text en © 2018 Mohammadi et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mohammadi, Ehsan
Thelwall, Mike
Kwasny, Mary
Holmes, Kristi L.
Academic information on Twitter: A user survey
title Academic information on Twitter: A user survey
title_full Academic information on Twitter: A user survey
title_fullStr Academic information on Twitter: A user survey
title_full_unstemmed Academic information on Twitter: A user survey
title_short Academic information on Twitter: A user survey
title_sort academic information on twitter: a user survey
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5957360/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29771947
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197265
work_keys_str_mv AT mohammadiehsan academicinformationontwitterausersurvey
AT thelwallmike academicinformationontwitterausersurvey
AT kwasnymary academicinformationontwitterausersurvey
AT holmeskristil academicinformationontwitterausersurvey