Cargando…

An Investigation of the Post-laryngectomy Swallow Using Videofluoroscopy and Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES)

This study investigates the post-laryngectomy swallow. Presence and degree of residue on the post-laryngectomy swallow as observed on videofluoroscopy and FEES is described. In addition, videofluoroscopy and FEES are assessed for reliability and inter-instrument agreement. 30 laryngectomy subjects u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Coffey, Margaret M., Tolley, Neil, Howard, David, Drinnan, Michael, Hickson, Mary
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5958146/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29352357
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00455-017-9862-7
_version_ 1783324190640701440
author Coffey, Margaret M.
Tolley, Neil
Howard, David
Drinnan, Michael
Hickson, Mary
author_facet Coffey, Margaret M.
Tolley, Neil
Howard, David
Drinnan, Michael
Hickson, Mary
author_sort Coffey, Margaret M.
collection PubMed
description This study investigates the post-laryngectomy swallow. Presence and degree of residue on the post-laryngectomy swallow as observed on videofluoroscopy and FEES is described. In addition, videofluoroscopy and FEES are assessed for reliability and inter-instrument agreement. 30 laryngectomy subjects underwent dysphagia evaluation using simultaneous videofluoroscopy and FEES. These were reviewed post-examination by three expert raters using a rating scale designed for this purpose. Raters were blinded to subject details, type of laryngectomy surgery, pairing of FEES and videofluoroscopy examinations and the scores of other raters. There was a finding of residue in 78% of videofluoroscopy ratings, and 83% of FEES ratings. Comparison of the tools indicated poor inter-rater reliability and poor inter-instrument agreement. Dysphagia is an issue post laryngectomy as measured by patient self-report and by instrumental evaluation. However, alternative dysphagia rating tools and dysphagia evaluation tools are required to enable accurate identification and intervention for underlying swallow physiology post laryngectomy. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00455-017-9862-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5958146
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59581462018-05-18 An Investigation of the Post-laryngectomy Swallow Using Videofluoroscopy and Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) Coffey, Margaret M. Tolley, Neil Howard, David Drinnan, Michael Hickson, Mary Dysphagia Original Article This study investigates the post-laryngectomy swallow. Presence and degree of residue on the post-laryngectomy swallow as observed on videofluoroscopy and FEES is described. In addition, videofluoroscopy and FEES are assessed for reliability and inter-instrument agreement. 30 laryngectomy subjects underwent dysphagia evaluation using simultaneous videofluoroscopy and FEES. These were reviewed post-examination by three expert raters using a rating scale designed for this purpose. Raters were blinded to subject details, type of laryngectomy surgery, pairing of FEES and videofluoroscopy examinations and the scores of other raters. There was a finding of residue in 78% of videofluoroscopy ratings, and 83% of FEES ratings. Comparison of the tools indicated poor inter-rater reliability and poor inter-instrument agreement. Dysphagia is an issue post laryngectomy as measured by patient self-report and by instrumental evaluation. However, alternative dysphagia rating tools and dysphagia evaluation tools are required to enable accurate identification and intervention for underlying swallow physiology post laryngectomy. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00455-017-9862-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2018-01-19 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5958146/ /pubmed/29352357 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00455-017-9862-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Coffey, Margaret M.
Tolley, Neil
Howard, David
Drinnan, Michael
Hickson, Mary
An Investigation of the Post-laryngectomy Swallow Using Videofluoroscopy and Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES)
title An Investigation of the Post-laryngectomy Swallow Using Videofluoroscopy and Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES)
title_full An Investigation of the Post-laryngectomy Swallow Using Videofluoroscopy and Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES)
title_fullStr An Investigation of the Post-laryngectomy Swallow Using Videofluoroscopy and Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES)
title_full_unstemmed An Investigation of the Post-laryngectomy Swallow Using Videofluoroscopy and Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES)
title_short An Investigation of the Post-laryngectomy Swallow Using Videofluoroscopy and Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES)
title_sort investigation of the post-laryngectomy swallow using videofluoroscopy and fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (fees)
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5958146/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29352357
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00455-017-9862-7
work_keys_str_mv AT coffeymargaretm aninvestigationofthepostlaryngectomyswallowusingvideofluoroscopyandfiberopticendoscopicevaluationofswallowingfees
AT tolleyneil aninvestigationofthepostlaryngectomyswallowusingvideofluoroscopyandfiberopticendoscopicevaluationofswallowingfees
AT howarddavid aninvestigationofthepostlaryngectomyswallowusingvideofluoroscopyandfiberopticendoscopicevaluationofswallowingfees
AT drinnanmichael aninvestigationofthepostlaryngectomyswallowusingvideofluoroscopyandfiberopticendoscopicevaluationofswallowingfees
AT hicksonmary aninvestigationofthepostlaryngectomyswallowusingvideofluoroscopyandfiberopticendoscopicevaluationofswallowingfees
AT coffeymargaretm investigationofthepostlaryngectomyswallowusingvideofluoroscopyandfiberopticendoscopicevaluationofswallowingfees
AT tolleyneil investigationofthepostlaryngectomyswallowusingvideofluoroscopyandfiberopticendoscopicevaluationofswallowingfees
AT howarddavid investigationofthepostlaryngectomyswallowusingvideofluoroscopyandfiberopticendoscopicevaluationofswallowingfees
AT drinnanmichael investigationofthepostlaryngectomyswallowusingvideofluoroscopyandfiberopticendoscopicevaluationofswallowingfees
AT hicksonmary investigationofthepostlaryngectomyswallowusingvideofluoroscopyandfiberopticendoscopicevaluationofswallowingfees