Cargando…

Viral load and antibody boosting following herpes zoster diagnosis

BACKGROUND: Acute varicella zoster virus (VZV) replication in shingles is accompanied by VZV antibody boosting. It is unclear whether persisting virus shedding affects antibody levels. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the relationship between VZV viral load and antibody titres in shingles patients during...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Warren-Gash, Charlotte, Forbes, Harriet, Maple, Peter, Quinlivan, Mark, Breuer, Judith
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5958243/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29602095
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2018.03.010
_version_ 1783324210867732480
author Warren-Gash, Charlotte
Forbes, Harriet
Maple, Peter
Quinlivan, Mark
Breuer, Judith
author_facet Warren-Gash, Charlotte
Forbes, Harriet
Maple, Peter
Quinlivan, Mark
Breuer, Judith
author_sort Warren-Gash, Charlotte
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Acute varicella zoster virus (VZV) replication in shingles is accompanied by VZV antibody boosting. It is unclear whether persisting virus shedding affects antibody levels. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the relationship between VZV viral load and antibody titres in shingles patients during six months following diagnosis and assess whether VZV antibody titre could discriminate patients with recent shingles from healthy population controls. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective study of 63 patients with active zoster. Blood samples were collected at baseline, one, three and six months to measure VZV DNA and IgG antibody titre. We compared VZV antibody titres of zoster patients and 441 controls. RESULTS: In acute zoster, viral load was highest at baseline and declined gradually over the following six months. Mean antibody titres rose fourfold, peaking at one month and remaining above baseline levels throughout the study. Antibody levels at one, three and six months after zoster were moderately correlated with baseline but not subsequent viral load. Regarding use of antibody titres to identify recent shingles, to achieve 80% sensitivity, specificity would be 23.4%, 67.7%, 64.8% and 52.6%, at baseline, visit 2, 3 and 4 respectively, whilst to achieve 80% specificity, sensitivity would be 28.3%, 66.1%, 52.6%, 38.6%, at baseline, visit 2, 3 and 4 respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical VZV reactivation boosted VZV antibody levels and the level of boosting was dependent upon baseline viral replication. While antibody titres could discriminate patients with shingles 1–6 months earlier from blood donor controls, there was a large trade-off between sensitivity and specificity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5958243
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Elsevier Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59582432018-06-01 Viral load and antibody boosting following herpes zoster diagnosis Warren-Gash, Charlotte Forbes, Harriet Maple, Peter Quinlivan, Mark Breuer, Judith J Clin Virol Article BACKGROUND: Acute varicella zoster virus (VZV) replication in shingles is accompanied by VZV antibody boosting. It is unclear whether persisting virus shedding affects antibody levels. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the relationship between VZV viral load and antibody titres in shingles patients during six months following diagnosis and assess whether VZV antibody titre could discriminate patients with recent shingles from healthy population controls. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective study of 63 patients with active zoster. Blood samples were collected at baseline, one, three and six months to measure VZV DNA and IgG antibody titre. We compared VZV antibody titres of zoster patients and 441 controls. RESULTS: In acute zoster, viral load was highest at baseline and declined gradually over the following six months. Mean antibody titres rose fourfold, peaking at one month and remaining above baseline levels throughout the study. Antibody levels at one, three and six months after zoster were moderately correlated with baseline but not subsequent viral load. Regarding use of antibody titres to identify recent shingles, to achieve 80% sensitivity, specificity would be 23.4%, 67.7%, 64.8% and 52.6%, at baseline, visit 2, 3 and 4 respectively, whilst to achieve 80% specificity, sensitivity would be 28.3%, 66.1%, 52.6%, 38.6%, at baseline, visit 2, 3 and 4 respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical VZV reactivation boosted VZV antibody levels and the level of boosting was dependent upon baseline viral replication. While antibody titres could discriminate patients with shingles 1–6 months earlier from blood donor controls, there was a large trade-off between sensitivity and specificity. Elsevier Science 2018-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5958243/ /pubmed/29602095 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2018.03.010 Text en © 2018 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Warren-Gash, Charlotte
Forbes, Harriet
Maple, Peter
Quinlivan, Mark
Breuer, Judith
Viral load and antibody boosting following herpes zoster diagnosis
title Viral load and antibody boosting following herpes zoster diagnosis
title_full Viral load and antibody boosting following herpes zoster diagnosis
title_fullStr Viral load and antibody boosting following herpes zoster diagnosis
title_full_unstemmed Viral load and antibody boosting following herpes zoster diagnosis
title_short Viral load and antibody boosting following herpes zoster diagnosis
title_sort viral load and antibody boosting following herpes zoster diagnosis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5958243/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29602095
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2018.03.010
work_keys_str_mv AT warrengashcharlotte viralloadandantibodyboostingfollowingherpeszosterdiagnosis
AT forbesharriet viralloadandantibodyboostingfollowingherpeszosterdiagnosis
AT maplepeter viralloadandantibodyboostingfollowingherpeszosterdiagnosis
AT quinlivanmark viralloadandantibodyboostingfollowingherpeszosterdiagnosis
AT breuerjudith viralloadandantibodyboostingfollowingherpeszosterdiagnosis