Cargando…

Porcelain color alteration after orthodontic bonding using three different surface preparation methods

BACKGROUND: By increasing the number of adults seeking orthodontic treatment bonding orthodontic brackets to the surfaces other than intact enamel has become necessary. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of three different surface preparation methods associated with orthodontic bon...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moradinezhad, Mehrnaz, Moradi, Mina, Shamohammadi, Milad, Hormozi, Elham, Ghorani, Amir
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5958534/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29922336
_version_ 1783324254266195968
author Moradinezhad, Mehrnaz
Moradi, Mina
Shamohammadi, Milad
Hormozi, Elham
Ghorani, Amir
author_facet Moradinezhad, Mehrnaz
Moradi, Mina
Shamohammadi, Milad
Hormozi, Elham
Ghorani, Amir
author_sort Moradinezhad, Mehrnaz
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: By increasing the number of adults seeking orthodontic treatment bonding orthodontic brackets to the surfaces other than intact enamel has become necessary. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of three different surface preparation methods associated with orthodontic bonding on porcelain color alteration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this in vitro study forty-five porcelain discs (6- mm diameter, 2- mm thickness) were fabricated. The color of the specimens was evaluated by means of a Vita Easyshade. Commision Internationale de I'Eclairage (CIE) L* a* b* system was used for color measurement. Then, the specimens were randomly divided into three groups (n = 15) with respect to the surface preparation methods including a 9.6% hydrofluoric acid (HF) + silane, sandblasting, and sandblasting + 9.6% HF + silane. Metal orthodontic brackets were bonded. Samples were stored in 37° c water for 24 hours. Afterward, the brackets were debonded with a debonding plier and porcelain surfaces were polished with a tungsten-carbide bur. The color assessment was done, and ΔE values were measured. ΔE = 3.7 units were considered as an acceptability threshold. Data were analyzed with Paired t-test and one-way ANOVA. Level of significance was set at P < 0.05. RESULTS: Orthodontic bonding changed the color parameters significantly. Mean L*, a* and b* difference were 1.35 ± 2.41, 0.19 ± 0.80, 0.89 ± 1.27 units, respectively (P = 0.003 for L*, P < 0.001 for a* and b*). There was not any significant difference in ΔE units between the groups (P = 0.456). In all the groups the mean ΔE values were below 3.7 units and within the clinically acceptable limit. CONCLUSION: Orthodontic treatment changed the CIE color parameters of porcelain surface. However, the color alteration is below the clinically acceptable threshold. With regard to color alteration, there is no difference between different surface conditioning methods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5958534
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59585342018-06-19 Porcelain color alteration after orthodontic bonding using three different surface preparation methods Moradinezhad, Mehrnaz Moradi, Mina Shamohammadi, Milad Hormozi, Elham Ghorani, Amir Dent Res J (Isfahan) Original Article BACKGROUND: By increasing the number of adults seeking orthodontic treatment bonding orthodontic brackets to the surfaces other than intact enamel has become necessary. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of three different surface preparation methods associated with orthodontic bonding on porcelain color alteration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this in vitro study forty-five porcelain discs (6- mm diameter, 2- mm thickness) were fabricated. The color of the specimens was evaluated by means of a Vita Easyshade. Commision Internationale de I'Eclairage (CIE) L* a* b* system was used for color measurement. Then, the specimens were randomly divided into three groups (n = 15) with respect to the surface preparation methods including a 9.6% hydrofluoric acid (HF) + silane, sandblasting, and sandblasting + 9.6% HF + silane. Metal orthodontic brackets were bonded. Samples were stored in 37° c water for 24 hours. Afterward, the brackets were debonded with a debonding plier and porcelain surfaces were polished with a tungsten-carbide bur. The color assessment was done, and ΔE values were measured. ΔE = 3.7 units were considered as an acceptability threshold. Data were analyzed with Paired t-test and one-way ANOVA. Level of significance was set at P < 0.05. RESULTS: Orthodontic bonding changed the color parameters significantly. Mean L*, a* and b* difference were 1.35 ± 2.41, 0.19 ± 0.80, 0.89 ± 1.27 units, respectively (P = 0.003 for L*, P < 0.001 for a* and b*). There was not any significant difference in ΔE units between the groups (P = 0.456). In all the groups the mean ΔE values were below 3.7 units and within the clinically acceptable limit. CONCLUSION: Orthodontic treatment changed the CIE color parameters of porcelain surface. However, the color alteration is below the clinically acceptable threshold. With regard to color alteration, there is no difference between different surface conditioning methods. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5958534/ /pubmed/29922336 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Dental Research Journal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Moradinezhad, Mehrnaz
Moradi, Mina
Shamohammadi, Milad
Hormozi, Elham
Ghorani, Amir
Porcelain color alteration after orthodontic bonding using three different surface preparation methods
title Porcelain color alteration after orthodontic bonding using three different surface preparation methods
title_full Porcelain color alteration after orthodontic bonding using three different surface preparation methods
title_fullStr Porcelain color alteration after orthodontic bonding using three different surface preparation methods
title_full_unstemmed Porcelain color alteration after orthodontic bonding using three different surface preparation methods
title_short Porcelain color alteration after orthodontic bonding using three different surface preparation methods
title_sort porcelain color alteration after orthodontic bonding using three different surface preparation methods
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5958534/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29922336
work_keys_str_mv AT moradinezhadmehrnaz porcelaincoloralterationafterorthodonticbondingusingthreedifferentsurfacepreparationmethods
AT moradimina porcelaincoloralterationafterorthodonticbondingusingthreedifferentsurfacepreparationmethods
AT shamohammadimilad porcelaincoloralterationafterorthodonticbondingusingthreedifferentsurfacepreparationmethods
AT hormozielham porcelaincoloralterationafterorthodonticbondingusingthreedifferentsurfacepreparationmethods
AT ghoraniamir porcelaincoloralterationafterorthodonticbondingusingthreedifferentsurfacepreparationmethods