Cargando…
Debate: When should we intervene in unstable angina - Time for an old look?
Current treatment modalities for patients with acute coronary syndromes center on early diagnosis, risk stratification and, increasingly, early treatment including invasive approaches. The appropriate timing of these invasive modalities in the context of the overall treatment program remains an area...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2000
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC59589/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11714399 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cvm-1-1-015 |
_version_ | 1782120079606939648 |
---|---|
author | Laskey, Warren K |
author_facet | Laskey, Warren K |
author_sort | Laskey, Warren K |
collection | PubMed |
description | Current treatment modalities for patients with acute coronary syndromes center on early diagnosis, risk stratification and, increasingly, early treatment including invasive approaches. The appropriate timing of these invasive modalities in the context of the overall treatment program remains an area of controversy. Specifically, studies in the past recommended a period of medical 'stabilization' while current approaches are considerably more aggressive. The potential hazard of early intervention, in particular, has not properly been weighed against the benefit. This article hopes to provide a framework for examining the appropriate timing of intervention, specifically percutaneous coronary intervention, in acute coronary syndromes. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-59589 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2000 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-595892001-11-06 Debate: When should we intervene in unstable angina - Time for an old look? Laskey, Warren K Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med Commentary Current treatment modalities for patients with acute coronary syndromes center on early diagnosis, risk stratification and, increasingly, early treatment including invasive approaches. The appropriate timing of these invasive modalities in the context of the overall treatment program remains an area of controversy. Specifically, studies in the past recommended a period of medical 'stabilization' while current approaches are considerably more aggressive. The potential hazard of early intervention, in particular, has not properly been weighed against the benefit. This article hopes to provide a framework for examining the appropriate timing of intervention, specifically percutaneous coronary intervention, in acute coronary syndromes. BioMed Central 2000 2000-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC59589/ /pubmed/11714399 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cvm-1-1-015 Text en Copyright © 2000 Current Controlled Trials Ltd |
spellingShingle | Commentary Laskey, Warren K Debate: When should we intervene in unstable angina - Time for an old look? |
title | Debate: When should we intervene in unstable angina - Time for an old look? |
title_full | Debate: When should we intervene in unstable angina - Time for an old look? |
title_fullStr | Debate: When should we intervene in unstable angina - Time for an old look? |
title_full_unstemmed | Debate: When should we intervene in unstable angina - Time for an old look? |
title_short | Debate: When should we intervene in unstable angina - Time for an old look? |
title_sort | debate: when should we intervene in unstable angina - time for an old look? |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC59589/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11714399 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cvm-1-1-015 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT laskeywarrenk debatewhenshouldweinterveneinunstableanginatimeforanoldlook |