Cargando…
Epidermis and Enamel: Insights Into Gnawing Criticisms of Human Bitemark Evidence
Critics describe forensic dentists' management of bitemark evidence as junk science with poor sensitivity and specificity and state that linkages to a biter are unfounded. Those vocal critics, supported by certain media, characterize odontologists' previous errors as egregious and petition...
Autores principales: | Barsley, Robert E., Bernstein, Mark L., Brumit, Paula C., Dorion, Robert B.J., Golden, Gregory S., Lewis, James M., McDowell, John D., Metcalf, Roger D., Senn, David R., Sweet, David, Weems, Richard A. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5959219/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29557817 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PAF.0000000000000392 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Gnawing at the bone
por: LeBrasseur, Nicole
Publicado: (2002) -
Forensic bitemark identification: weak foundations, exaggerated claims
por: Saks, Michael J., et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Analysis of time-dependent changes in Bitemarks on Styrofoam sheets
por: Parimala, Djeapragassam, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Bitemarks analysis of orthodontically treated suspects – an identification approach
por: Nunes, T., et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Rare evidence for ‘gnawing-like’ behavior in a small-bodied theropod dinosaur
por: Brown, Caleb M., et al.
Publicado: (2021)