Cargando…
Retrieval and sleep both counteract the forgetting of spatial information
Repeatedly studying information is a good way to strengthen memory storage. Nevertheless, testing recall often produces superior long-term retention. Demonstrations of this testing effect, typically with verbal stimuli, have shown that repeated retrieval through testing reduces forgetting. Sleep als...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5959224/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29764971 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/lm.046268.117 |
_version_ | 1783324355936124928 |
---|---|
author | Antony, James W. Paller, Ken A. |
author_facet | Antony, James W. Paller, Ken A. |
author_sort | Antony, James W. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Repeatedly studying information is a good way to strengthen memory storage. Nevertheless, testing recall often produces superior long-term retention. Demonstrations of this testing effect, typically with verbal stimuli, have shown that repeated retrieval through testing reduces forgetting. Sleep also benefits memory storage, perhaps through repeated retrieval as well. That is, memories may generally be subject to forgetting that can be counteracted when memories become reactivated, and there are several types of reactivation: (i) via intentional restudying, (ii) via testing, (iii) without provocation during wake, or (iv) during sleep. We thus measured forgetting for spatial material subjected to repeated study or repeated testing followed by retention intervals with sleep versus wake. Four groups of subjects learned a set of visual object-location associations and either restudied the associations or recalled locations given the objects as cues. We found the advantage for restudied over retested information was greater in the PM than AM group. Additional groups tested at 5-min and 1-wk retention intervals confirmed previous findings of greater relative benefits for restudying in the short-term and for retesting in the long-term. Results overall support the conclusion that repeated reactivation through testing or sleeping stabilizes information against forgetting. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5959224 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59592242019-06-01 Retrieval and sleep both counteract the forgetting of spatial information Antony, James W. Paller, Ken A. Learn Mem Research Repeatedly studying information is a good way to strengthen memory storage. Nevertheless, testing recall often produces superior long-term retention. Demonstrations of this testing effect, typically with verbal stimuli, have shown that repeated retrieval through testing reduces forgetting. Sleep also benefits memory storage, perhaps through repeated retrieval as well. That is, memories may generally be subject to forgetting that can be counteracted when memories become reactivated, and there are several types of reactivation: (i) via intentional restudying, (ii) via testing, (iii) without provocation during wake, or (iv) during sleep. We thus measured forgetting for spatial material subjected to repeated study or repeated testing followed by retention intervals with sleep versus wake. Four groups of subjects learned a set of visual object-location associations and either restudied the associations or recalled locations given the objects as cues. We found the advantage for restudied over retested information was greater in the PM than AM group. Additional groups tested at 5-min and 1-wk retention intervals confirmed previous findings of greater relative benefits for restudying in the short-term and for retesting in the long-term. Results overall support the conclusion that repeated reactivation through testing or sleeping stabilizes information against forgetting. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press 2018-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5959224/ /pubmed/29764971 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/lm.046268.117 Text en © 2018 Antony and Paller; Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed exclusively by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press for the first 12 months after the full-issue publication date (see http://learnmem.cshlp.org/site/misc/terms.xhtml). After 12 months, it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International), as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Research Antony, James W. Paller, Ken A. Retrieval and sleep both counteract the forgetting of spatial information |
title | Retrieval and sleep both counteract the forgetting of spatial information |
title_full | Retrieval and sleep both counteract the forgetting of spatial information |
title_fullStr | Retrieval and sleep both counteract the forgetting of spatial information |
title_full_unstemmed | Retrieval and sleep both counteract the forgetting of spatial information |
title_short | Retrieval and sleep both counteract the forgetting of spatial information |
title_sort | retrieval and sleep both counteract the forgetting of spatial information |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5959224/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29764971 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/lm.046268.117 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT antonyjamesw retrievalandsleepbothcounteracttheforgettingofspatialinformation AT pallerkena retrievalandsleepbothcounteracttheforgettingofspatialinformation |