Cargando…

Retrieval and sleep both counteract the forgetting of spatial information

Repeatedly studying information is a good way to strengthen memory storage. Nevertheless, testing recall often produces superior long-term retention. Demonstrations of this testing effect, typically with verbal stimuli, have shown that repeated retrieval through testing reduces forgetting. Sleep als...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Antony, James W., Paller, Ken A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5959224/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29764971
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/lm.046268.117
_version_ 1783324355936124928
author Antony, James W.
Paller, Ken A.
author_facet Antony, James W.
Paller, Ken A.
author_sort Antony, James W.
collection PubMed
description Repeatedly studying information is a good way to strengthen memory storage. Nevertheless, testing recall often produces superior long-term retention. Demonstrations of this testing effect, typically with verbal stimuli, have shown that repeated retrieval through testing reduces forgetting. Sleep also benefits memory storage, perhaps through repeated retrieval as well. That is, memories may generally be subject to forgetting that can be counteracted when memories become reactivated, and there are several types of reactivation: (i) via intentional restudying, (ii) via testing, (iii) without provocation during wake, or (iv) during sleep. We thus measured forgetting for spatial material subjected to repeated study or repeated testing followed by retention intervals with sleep versus wake. Four groups of subjects learned a set of visual object-location associations and either restudied the associations or recalled locations given the objects as cues. We found the advantage for restudied over retested information was greater in the PM than AM group. Additional groups tested at 5-min and 1-wk retention intervals confirmed previous findings of greater relative benefits for restudying in the short-term and for retesting in the long-term. Results overall support the conclusion that repeated reactivation through testing or sleeping stabilizes information against forgetting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5959224
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59592242019-06-01 Retrieval and sleep both counteract the forgetting of spatial information Antony, James W. Paller, Ken A. Learn Mem Research Repeatedly studying information is a good way to strengthen memory storage. Nevertheless, testing recall often produces superior long-term retention. Demonstrations of this testing effect, typically with verbal stimuli, have shown that repeated retrieval through testing reduces forgetting. Sleep also benefits memory storage, perhaps through repeated retrieval as well. That is, memories may generally be subject to forgetting that can be counteracted when memories become reactivated, and there are several types of reactivation: (i) via intentional restudying, (ii) via testing, (iii) without provocation during wake, or (iv) during sleep. We thus measured forgetting for spatial material subjected to repeated study or repeated testing followed by retention intervals with sleep versus wake. Four groups of subjects learned a set of visual object-location associations and either restudied the associations or recalled locations given the objects as cues. We found the advantage for restudied over retested information was greater in the PM than AM group. Additional groups tested at 5-min and 1-wk retention intervals confirmed previous findings of greater relative benefits for restudying in the short-term and for retesting in the long-term. Results overall support the conclusion that repeated reactivation through testing or sleeping stabilizes information against forgetting. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press 2018-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5959224/ /pubmed/29764971 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/lm.046268.117 Text en © 2018 Antony and Paller; Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed exclusively by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press for the first 12 months after the full-issue publication date (see http://learnmem.cshlp.org/site/misc/terms.xhtml). After 12 months, it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International), as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research
Antony, James W.
Paller, Ken A.
Retrieval and sleep both counteract the forgetting of spatial information
title Retrieval and sleep both counteract the forgetting of spatial information
title_full Retrieval and sleep both counteract the forgetting of spatial information
title_fullStr Retrieval and sleep both counteract the forgetting of spatial information
title_full_unstemmed Retrieval and sleep both counteract the forgetting of spatial information
title_short Retrieval and sleep both counteract the forgetting of spatial information
title_sort retrieval and sleep both counteract the forgetting of spatial information
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5959224/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29764971
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/lm.046268.117
work_keys_str_mv AT antonyjamesw retrievalandsleepbothcounteracttheforgettingofspatialinformation
AT pallerkena retrievalandsleepbothcounteracttheforgettingofspatialinformation