Cargando…
Role of MRCP in Diagnosing Biliary Anastomotic Strictures After Liver Transplantation: A Single Tertiary Care Center Experience
BACKGROUND: Biliary strictures (BS) are common complication after liver transplantation. We aimed to determine the accuracy of magnetic resonance cholagiopancreatography (MRCP) in diagnosing BS in liver transplant recipients (LTRs) when compared to direct cholangiographic methods (endoscopic resonan...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5959342/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29796418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TXD.0000000000000789 |
_version_ | 1783324372228898816 |
---|---|
author | Akbar, Ali Tran, Quynh T. Nair, Satheesh P. Parikh, Salil Bilal, Muhammad Ismail, Mohammed Vanatta, Jason M. Eason, James D. Satapathy, Sanjaya K. |
author_facet | Akbar, Ali Tran, Quynh T. Nair, Satheesh P. Parikh, Salil Bilal, Muhammad Ismail, Mohammed Vanatta, Jason M. Eason, James D. Satapathy, Sanjaya K. |
author_sort | Akbar, Ali |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Biliary strictures (BS) are common complication after liver transplantation. We aimed to determine the accuracy of magnetic resonance cholagiopancreatography (MRCP) in diagnosing BS in liver transplant recipients (LTRs) when compared to direct cholangiographic methods (endoscopic resonance cholagiopancreatography [ERCP] and/or percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography [PTC]). METHODS: Retrospective chart review of 910 LTRs (July 2008 to April 2015) was performed, and a total of 39 patients with duct-to-duct anastomosis (22 males; 56.4%; mean age, 52.8 ± 8.3 years) were included who had an MRCP followed by either ERCP and/or PTC within 4 weeks. A cholangiographic narrowing (on ERCP and/or PTC) that required balloon dilation and/or stent placement was considered a BS and was considered clinically significant if the intervention resulted in at least 30% improvement of bilirubin within 2 weeks. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive values and negative predictive values of MRCP in diagnosing BS were calculated. RESULTS: Magnetic resonance cholagiopancreatography showed anastomotic BS in 17 of 39 patients, and subsequent ERCP and/or PTC revealed a total of 25 BS (positive predictive value of 0.94). Nine BS on cholangiography (ERCP, 8; PTC, 1) were not detected on earlier MRCP (sensitivity, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.45-0.82); 2 were clinically significant BS and 6 of the remaining 7 had no improvement in their liver function test with biliary intervention. Thirteen LTRs had no BS on either modality (specificity, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.66-0.99). The negative predictive value of MRCP was 0.59 for cholangiographic BS. The overall accuracy of MRCP is 0.74 (exact 95% CI, 0.58-0.87). Inclusion of age, race, and alanine aminotransferase level improved the predictive value of MRCP (area under the curve = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.86-1.00). CONCLUSIONS: Magnetic resonance cholagiopancreatography has high specificity but low sensitivity in diagnosing cholangiographic BS in LTRs, although the predictive value further improved with inclusion of age, race, and alanine aminotransferase. Clinical significance of BS in LTRs not identified on MRCP is questionable because ERCP with intervention did not improve their liver function tests in the vast majority. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5959342 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59593422018-05-24 Role of MRCP in Diagnosing Biliary Anastomotic Strictures After Liver Transplantation: A Single Tertiary Care Center Experience Akbar, Ali Tran, Quynh T. Nair, Satheesh P. Parikh, Salil Bilal, Muhammad Ismail, Mohammed Vanatta, Jason M. Eason, James D. Satapathy, Sanjaya K. Transplant Direct Liver Transplantation BACKGROUND: Biliary strictures (BS) are common complication after liver transplantation. We aimed to determine the accuracy of magnetic resonance cholagiopancreatography (MRCP) in diagnosing BS in liver transplant recipients (LTRs) when compared to direct cholangiographic methods (endoscopic resonance cholagiopancreatography [ERCP] and/or percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography [PTC]). METHODS: Retrospective chart review of 910 LTRs (July 2008 to April 2015) was performed, and a total of 39 patients with duct-to-duct anastomosis (22 males; 56.4%; mean age, 52.8 ± 8.3 years) were included who had an MRCP followed by either ERCP and/or PTC within 4 weeks. A cholangiographic narrowing (on ERCP and/or PTC) that required balloon dilation and/or stent placement was considered a BS and was considered clinically significant if the intervention resulted in at least 30% improvement of bilirubin within 2 weeks. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive values and negative predictive values of MRCP in diagnosing BS were calculated. RESULTS: Magnetic resonance cholagiopancreatography showed anastomotic BS in 17 of 39 patients, and subsequent ERCP and/or PTC revealed a total of 25 BS (positive predictive value of 0.94). Nine BS on cholangiography (ERCP, 8; PTC, 1) were not detected on earlier MRCP (sensitivity, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.45-0.82); 2 were clinically significant BS and 6 of the remaining 7 had no improvement in their liver function test with biliary intervention. Thirteen LTRs had no BS on either modality (specificity, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.66-0.99). The negative predictive value of MRCP was 0.59 for cholangiographic BS. The overall accuracy of MRCP is 0.74 (exact 95% CI, 0.58-0.87). Inclusion of age, race, and alanine aminotransferase level improved the predictive value of MRCP (area under the curve = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.86-1.00). CONCLUSIONS: Magnetic resonance cholagiopancreatography has high specificity but low sensitivity in diagnosing cholangiographic BS in LTRs, although the predictive value further improved with inclusion of age, race, and alanine aminotransferase. Clinical significance of BS in LTRs not identified on MRCP is questionable because ERCP with intervention did not improve their liver function tests in the vast majority. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2018-04-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5959342/ /pubmed/29796418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TXD.0000000000000789 Text en Copyright © 2018 The Author(s). Transplantation Direct. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Liver Transplantation Akbar, Ali Tran, Quynh T. Nair, Satheesh P. Parikh, Salil Bilal, Muhammad Ismail, Mohammed Vanatta, Jason M. Eason, James D. Satapathy, Sanjaya K. Role of MRCP in Diagnosing Biliary Anastomotic Strictures After Liver Transplantation: A Single Tertiary Care Center Experience |
title | Role of MRCP in Diagnosing Biliary Anastomotic Strictures After Liver Transplantation: A Single Tertiary Care Center Experience |
title_full | Role of MRCP in Diagnosing Biliary Anastomotic Strictures After Liver Transplantation: A Single Tertiary Care Center Experience |
title_fullStr | Role of MRCP in Diagnosing Biliary Anastomotic Strictures After Liver Transplantation: A Single Tertiary Care Center Experience |
title_full_unstemmed | Role of MRCP in Diagnosing Biliary Anastomotic Strictures After Liver Transplantation: A Single Tertiary Care Center Experience |
title_short | Role of MRCP in Diagnosing Biliary Anastomotic Strictures After Liver Transplantation: A Single Tertiary Care Center Experience |
title_sort | role of mrcp in diagnosing biliary anastomotic strictures after liver transplantation: a single tertiary care center experience |
topic | Liver Transplantation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5959342/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29796418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TXD.0000000000000789 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT akbarali roleofmrcpindiagnosingbiliaryanastomoticstricturesafterlivertransplantationasingletertiarycarecenterexperience AT tranquynht roleofmrcpindiagnosingbiliaryanastomoticstricturesafterlivertransplantationasingletertiarycarecenterexperience AT nairsatheeshp roleofmrcpindiagnosingbiliaryanastomoticstricturesafterlivertransplantationasingletertiarycarecenterexperience AT parikhsalil roleofmrcpindiagnosingbiliaryanastomoticstricturesafterlivertransplantationasingletertiarycarecenterexperience AT bilalmuhammad roleofmrcpindiagnosingbiliaryanastomoticstricturesafterlivertransplantationasingletertiarycarecenterexperience AT ismailmohammed roleofmrcpindiagnosingbiliaryanastomoticstricturesafterlivertransplantationasingletertiarycarecenterexperience AT vanattajasonm roleofmrcpindiagnosingbiliaryanastomoticstricturesafterlivertransplantationasingletertiarycarecenterexperience AT easonjamesd roleofmrcpindiagnosingbiliaryanastomoticstricturesafterlivertransplantationasingletertiarycarecenterexperience AT satapathysanjayak roleofmrcpindiagnosingbiliaryanastomoticstricturesafterlivertransplantationasingletertiarycarecenterexperience |