Cargando…

Inadvertent defibrillator lead placement into the left ventricle after MitraClip implantation: A case report

RATIONALE: Inadvertent pacemaker/defibrillator lead placement into the left ventricle is an unusual cardiac device-related complication and its diagnosis is not always easy and often misunderstood. Thromboembolic events are frequently associated with this procedural complication. Percutaneous lead e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Santarpia, Giuseppe, Passafaro, Francesco, Pasceri, Eugenia, Mongiardo, Annalisa, Curcio, Antonio, Indolfi, Ciro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5959426/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29742737
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000010733
_version_ 1783324390712147968
author Santarpia, Giuseppe
Passafaro, Francesco
Pasceri, Eugenia
Mongiardo, Annalisa
Curcio, Antonio
Indolfi, Ciro
author_facet Santarpia, Giuseppe
Passafaro, Francesco
Pasceri, Eugenia
Mongiardo, Annalisa
Curcio, Antonio
Indolfi, Ciro
author_sort Santarpia, Giuseppe
collection PubMed
description RATIONALE: Inadvertent pacemaker/defibrillator lead placement into the left ventricle is an unusual cardiac device-related complication and its diagnosis is not always easy and often misunderstood. Thromboembolic events are frequently associated with this procedural complication. Percutaneous lead extraction should be performed when diagnosis is made early after device implantation while long-life oral anticoagulation is a wise option when the diagnosis is delayed and the lead is not removed. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 65-year-old man affected by dilated cardiomyopathy, previously treated with a percutaneous mitral valve repair, with 2 MitraClip devices, and later with dual chamber cardioverter/defibrillator implantation, returned in outpatient clinics 2 months after discharge for deterioration of dyspnea; transthoracic echocardiography revealed that the shock lead had been accidentally placed in the apex of the left ventricle. DIAGNOSES: The unintentional lead malposition through the iatrogenic atrial septal defect and its presence into the mitral valve orifice, together with the 2 clip devices implanted, generated an acceleration of transvalvular diastolic flow, determining a moderate stenosis of the mitral valve, as well as promoting a worsening of the degree of valvular regurgitation. INTERVENTIONS: Oral anticoagulation therapy was started and a mechanical lead extraction was percutaneously performed. A new defibrillator lead was later appropriately positioned in the apex of the right ventricle. OUTCOMES: The patient was discharged 3 days after intervention and the follow-up, performed 1 month after discharge, was uneventful. LESSONS: Complex interventional procedures and implantation of multiple devices can increase procedural troubles and the risk of mechanical complications related to pacemaker/defibrillator implantation. Careful observation of the QRS complex morphology on the electrocardiogram (ECG), during paced rhythm, and the achievement of the echocardiographic examination, in the postprocedural phase, allow an early diagnosis of lead malposition.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5959426
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59594262018-05-24 Inadvertent defibrillator lead placement into the left ventricle after MitraClip implantation: A case report Santarpia, Giuseppe Passafaro, Francesco Pasceri, Eugenia Mongiardo, Annalisa Curcio, Antonio Indolfi, Ciro Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article RATIONALE: Inadvertent pacemaker/defibrillator lead placement into the left ventricle is an unusual cardiac device-related complication and its diagnosis is not always easy and often misunderstood. Thromboembolic events are frequently associated with this procedural complication. Percutaneous lead extraction should be performed when diagnosis is made early after device implantation while long-life oral anticoagulation is a wise option when the diagnosis is delayed and the lead is not removed. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 65-year-old man affected by dilated cardiomyopathy, previously treated with a percutaneous mitral valve repair, with 2 MitraClip devices, and later with dual chamber cardioverter/defibrillator implantation, returned in outpatient clinics 2 months after discharge for deterioration of dyspnea; transthoracic echocardiography revealed that the shock lead had been accidentally placed in the apex of the left ventricle. DIAGNOSES: The unintentional lead malposition through the iatrogenic atrial septal defect and its presence into the mitral valve orifice, together with the 2 clip devices implanted, generated an acceleration of transvalvular diastolic flow, determining a moderate stenosis of the mitral valve, as well as promoting a worsening of the degree of valvular regurgitation. INTERVENTIONS: Oral anticoagulation therapy was started and a mechanical lead extraction was percutaneously performed. A new defibrillator lead was later appropriately positioned in the apex of the right ventricle. OUTCOMES: The patient was discharged 3 days after intervention and the follow-up, performed 1 month after discharge, was uneventful. LESSONS: Complex interventional procedures and implantation of multiple devices can increase procedural troubles and the risk of mechanical complications related to pacemaker/defibrillator implantation. Careful observation of the QRS complex morphology on the electrocardiogram (ECG), during paced rhythm, and the achievement of the echocardiographic examination, in the postprocedural phase, allow an early diagnosis of lead malposition. Wolters Kluwer Health 2018-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5959426/ /pubmed/29742737 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000010733 Text en Copyright © 2018 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle Research Article
Santarpia, Giuseppe
Passafaro, Francesco
Pasceri, Eugenia
Mongiardo, Annalisa
Curcio, Antonio
Indolfi, Ciro
Inadvertent defibrillator lead placement into the left ventricle after MitraClip implantation: A case report
title Inadvertent defibrillator lead placement into the left ventricle after MitraClip implantation: A case report
title_full Inadvertent defibrillator lead placement into the left ventricle after MitraClip implantation: A case report
title_fullStr Inadvertent defibrillator lead placement into the left ventricle after MitraClip implantation: A case report
title_full_unstemmed Inadvertent defibrillator lead placement into the left ventricle after MitraClip implantation: A case report
title_short Inadvertent defibrillator lead placement into the left ventricle after MitraClip implantation: A case report
title_sort inadvertent defibrillator lead placement into the left ventricle after mitraclip implantation: a case report
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5959426/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29742737
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000010733
work_keys_str_mv AT santarpiagiuseppe inadvertentdefibrillatorleadplacementintotheleftventricleaftermitraclipimplantationacasereport
AT passafarofrancesco inadvertentdefibrillatorleadplacementintotheleftventricleaftermitraclipimplantationacasereport
AT pascerieugenia inadvertentdefibrillatorleadplacementintotheleftventricleaftermitraclipimplantationacasereport
AT mongiardoannalisa inadvertentdefibrillatorleadplacementintotheleftventricleaftermitraclipimplantationacasereport
AT curcioantonio inadvertentdefibrillatorleadplacementintotheleftventricleaftermitraclipimplantationacasereport
AT indolficiro inadvertentdefibrillatorleadplacementintotheleftventricleaftermitraclipimplantationacasereport