Cargando…

Why do antioxidants fail to provide clinical benefit?

The results of recent randomized trials to test the influence of antioxidants on coronary-event rates and prognosis in patients with coronary-artery disease were disappointing. In none of these studies did the use of vitamin E improve prognosis. In contrast, treatment of coronary-artery disease with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Warnholtz, Ascan, Münzel, Thomas
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2000
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC59596/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11714406
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cvm-1-1-038
_version_ 1782120081326604288
author Warnholtz, Ascan
Münzel, Thomas
author_facet Warnholtz, Ascan
Münzel, Thomas
author_sort Warnholtz, Ascan
collection PubMed
description The results of recent randomized trials to test the influence of antioxidants on coronary-event rates and prognosis in patients with coronary-artery disease were disappointing. In none of these studies did the use of vitamin E improve prognosis. In contrast, treatment of coronary-artery disease with angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors reduced coronary-event rates and improved prognosis. ACE inhibition prevents the formation of angiotensin II, which has been shown to be a potent stimulus of superoxide-producing enzymes in atherosclerosis. The findings suggest that inhibition of superoxide production at enzymatic levels, rather than symptomatic superoxide scavenging, may be the better choice of treatment.
format Text
id pubmed-59596
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2000
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-595962001-11-06 Why do antioxidants fail to provide clinical benefit? Warnholtz, Ascan Münzel, Thomas Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med Commentary The results of recent randomized trials to test the influence of antioxidants on coronary-event rates and prognosis in patients with coronary-artery disease were disappointing. In none of these studies did the use of vitamin E improve prognosis. In contrast, treatment of coronary-artery disease with angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors reduced coronary-event rates and improved prognosis. ACE inhibition prevents the formation of angiotensin II, which has been shown to be a potent stimulus of superoxide-producing enzymes in atherosclerosis. The findings suggest that inhibition of superoxide production at enzymatic levels, rather than symptomatic superoxide scavenging, may be the better choice of treatment. BioMed Central 2000 2000-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC59596/ /pubmed/11714406 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cvm-1-1-038 Text en Copyright © 2000 Current Controlled Trials Ltd
spellingShingle Commentary
Warnholtz, Ascan
Münzel, Thomas
Why do antioxidants fail to provide clinical benefit?
title Why do antioxidants fail to provide clinical benefit?
title_full Why do antioxidants fail to provide clinical benefit?
title_fullStr Why do antioxidants fail to provide clinical benefit?
title_full_unstemmed Why do antioxidants fail to provide clinical benefit?
title_short Why do antioxidants fail to provide clinical benefit?
title_sort why do antioxidants fail to provide clinical benefit?
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC59596/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11714406
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cvm-1-1-038
work_keys_str_mv AT warnholtzascan whydoantioxidantsfailtoprovideclinicalbenefit
AT munzelthomas whydoantioxidantsfailtoprovideclinicalbenefit