Cargando…
Why do antioxidants fail to provide clinical benefit?
The results of recent randomized trials to test the influence of antioxidants on coronary-event rates and prognosis in patients with coronary-artery disease were disappointing. In none of these studies did the use of vitamin E improve prognosis. In contrast, treatment of coronary-artery disease with...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2000
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC59596/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11714406 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cvm-1-1-038 |
_version_ | 1782120081326604288 |
---|---|
author | Warnholtz, Ascan Münzel, Thomas |
author_facet | Warnholtz, Ascan Münzel, Thomas |
author_sort | Warnholtz, Ascan |
collection | PubMed |
description | The results of recent randomized trials to test the influence of antioxidants on coronary-event rates and prognosis in patients with coronary-artery disease were disappointing. In none of these studies did the use of vitamin E improve prognosis. In contrast, treatment of coronary-artery disease with angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors reduced coronary-event rates and improved prognosis. ACE inhibition prevents the formation of angiotensin II, which has been shown to be a potent stimulus of superoxide-producing enzymes in atherosclerosis. The findings suggest that inhibition of superoxide production at enzymatic levels, rather than symptomatic superoxide scavenging, may be the better choice of treatment. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-59596 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2000 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-595962001-11-06 Why do antioxidants fail to provide clinical benefit? Warnholtz, Ascan Münzel, Thomas Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med Commentary The results of recent randomized trials to test the influence of antioxidants on coronary-event rates and prognosis in patients with coronary-artery disease were disappointing. In none of these studies did the use of vitamin E improve prognosis. In contrast, treatment of coronary-artery disease with angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors reduced coronary-event rates and improved prognosis. ACE inhibition prevents the formation of angiotensin II, which has been shown to be a potent stimulus of superoxide-producing enzymes in atherosclerosis. The findings suggest that inhibition of superoxide production at enzymatic levels, rather than symptomatic superoxide scavenging, may be the better choice of treatment. BioMed Central 2000 2000-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC59596/ /pubmed/11714406 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cvm-1-1-038 Text en Copyright © 2000 Current Controlled Trials Ltd |
spellingShingle | Commentary Warnholtz, Ascan Münzel, Thomas Why do antioxidants fail to provide clinical benefit? |
title | Why do antioxidants fail to provide clinical benefit? |
title_full | Why do antioxidants fail to provide clinical benefit? |
title_fullStr | Why do antioxidants fail to provide clinical benefit? |
title_full_unstemmed | Why do antioxidants fail to provide clinical benefit? |
title_short | Why do antioxidants fail to provide clinical benefit? |
title_sort | why do antioxidants fail to provide clinical benefit? |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC59596/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11714406 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cvm-1-1-038 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT warnholtzascan whydoantioxidantsfailtoprovideclinicalbenefit AT munzelthomas whydoantioxidantsfailtoprovideclinicalbenefit |