Cargando…

Tumour mutation status and melanoma recurrence following a negative sentinel lymph node biopsy

BACKGROUND: A proportion of patients develop recurrence following a tumour-negative sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). This study aimed to explore whether melanoma patients with BRAF or NRAS mutant tumours have an increased risk of developing disease recurrence following a negative SLNB compared to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Adler, Nikki R., Wolfe, Rory, McArthur, Grant A., Kelly, John W., Haydon, Andrew, McLean, Catriona A., Mar, Victoria J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5959932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29755118
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-018-0088-8
_version_ 1783324486057066496
author Adler, Nikki R.
Wolfe, Rory
McArthur, Grant A.
Kelly, John W.
Haydon, Andrew
McLean, Catriona A.
Mar, Victoria J.
author_facet Adler, Nikki R.
Wolfe, Rory
McArthur, Grant A.
Kelly, John W.
Haydon, Andrew
McLean, Catriona A.
Mar, Victoria J.
author_sort Adler, Nikki R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A proportion of patients develop recurrence following a tumour-negative sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). This study aimed to explore whether melanoma patients with BRAF or NRAS mutant tumours have an increased risk of developing disease recurrence following a negative SLNB compared to patients with wild-type tumours. METHODS: Prospective cohort study of melanoma patients at three tertiary referral centres in Melbourne, who underwent SLNB. Clinical, pathological and molecular characteristics and recurrence data were prospectively recorded. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models estimated the adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) for the association between mutation status and development of recurrence following a negative-SLNB. RESULTS: Overall, 344/477 (72.1%) patients had a negative SLNB. Of these, 54 (15.7%) developed subsequent recurrence. The risk of disease recurrence following a negative SLNB was increased for patients with either a BRAF or NRAS mutant tumour compared to wild-type tumours (aHR 1.92, 95% CI: 1.02–3.60, p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Melanoma patients with BRAF or NRAS mutant tumours had an increased risk compared to patients with BRAF/NRAS wild-type tumours of developing disease recurrence following a tumour-negative SLNB. The findings also confirm the importance of continued surveillance to monitor for disease recurrence among SLNB-negative patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5959932
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59599322019-05-15 Tumour mutation status and melanoma recurrence following a negative sentinel lymph node biopsy Adler, Nikki R. Wolfe, Rory McArthur, Grant A. Kelly, John W. Haydon, Andrew McLean, Catriona A. Mar, Victoria J. Br J Cancer Article BACKGROUND: A proportion of patients develop recurrence following a tumour-negative sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). This study aimed to explore whether melanoma patients with BRAF or NRAS mutant tumours have an increased risk of developing disease recurrence following a negative SLNB compared to patients with wild-type tumours. METHODS: Prospective cohort study of melanoma patients at three tertiary referral centres in Melbourne, who underwent SLNB. Clinical, pathological and molecular characteristics and recurrence data were prospectively recorded. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models estimated the adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) for the association between mutation status and development of recurrence following a negative-SLNB. RESULTS: Overall, 344/477 (72.1%) patients had a negative SLNB. Of these, 54 (15.7%) developed subsequent recurrence. The risk of disease recurrence following a negative SLNB was increased for patients with either a BRAF or NRAS mutant tumour compared to wild-type tumours (aHR 1.92, 95% CI: 1.02–3.60, p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Melanoma patients with BRAF or NRAS mutant tumours had an increased risk compared to patients with BRAF/NRAS wild-type tumours of developing disease recurrence following a tumour-negative SLNB. The findings also confirm the importance of continued surveillance to monitor for disease recurrence among SLNB-negative patients. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-05-14 2018-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5959932/ /pubmed/29755118 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-018-0088-8 Text en © Cancer Research UK 2018 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Note: This work is published under the standard license to publish agreement. After 12 months the work will become freely available and the license terms will switch to a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence (CC BY 4.0).
spellingShingle Article
Adler, Nikki R.
Wolfe, Rory
McArthur, Grant A.
Kelly, John W.
Haydon, Andrew
McLean, Catriona A.
Mar, Victoria J.
Tumour mutation status and melanoma recurrence following a negative sentinel lymph node biopsy
title Tumour mutation status and melanoma recurrence following a negative sentinel lymph node biopsy
title_full Tumour mutation status and melanoma recurrence following a negative sentinel lymph node biopsy
title_fullStr Tumour mutation status and melanoma recurrence following a negative sentinel lymph node biopsy
title_full_unstemmed Tumour mutation status and melanoma recurrence following a negative sentinel lymph node biopsy
title_short Tumour mutation status and melanoma recurrence following a negative sentinel lymph node biopsy
title_sort tumour mutation status and melanoma recurrence following a negative sentinel lymph node biopsy
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5959932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29755118
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-018-0088-8
work_keys_str_mv AT adlernikkir tumourmutationstatusandmelanomarecurrencefollowinganegativesentinellymphnodebiopsy
AT wolferory tumourmutationstatusandmelanomarecurrencefollowinganegativesentinellymphnodebiopsy
AT mcarthurgranta tumourmutationstatusandmelanomarecurrencefollowinganegativesentinellymphnodebiopsy
AT kellyjohnw tumourmutationstatusandmelanomarecurrencefollowinganegativesentinellymphnodebiopsy
AT haydonandrew tumourmutationstatusandmelanomarecurrencefollowinganegativesentinellymphnodebiopsy
AT mcleancatrionaa tumourmutationstatusandmelanomarecurrencefollowinganegativesentinellymphnodebiopsy
AT marvictoriaj tumourmutationstatusandmelanomarecurrencefollowinganegativesentinellymphnodebiopsy