Cargando…

Revisiting out-of-pocket requirements: trends in spending, financial access barriers, and policy in ten high-income countries

BACKGROUND: Countries rely on out-of-pocket (OOP) spending to different degrees and employ varying techniques. The article examines trends in OOP spending in ten high-income countries since 2000, and analyzes their relationship to self-assessed barriers to accessing health care services. The countri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rice, Thomas, Quentin, Wilm, Anell, Anders, Barnes, Andrew J., Rosenau, Pauline, Unruh, Lynn Y., van Ginneken, Ewout
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5960112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29776404
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3185-8
_version_ 1783324526850867200
author Rice, Thomas
Quentin, Wilm
Anell, Anders
Barnes, Andrew J.
Rosenau, Pauline
Unruh, Lynn Y.
van Ginneken, Ewout
author_facet Rice, Thomas
Quentin, Wilm
Anell, Anders
Barnes, Andrew J.
Rosenau, Pauline
Unruh, Lynn Y.
van Ginneken, Ewout
author_sort Rice, Thomas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Countries rely on out-of-pocket (OOP) spending to different degrees and employ varying techniques. The article examines trends in OOP spending in ten high-income countries since 2000, and analyzes their relationship to self-assessed barriers to accessing health care services. The countries are Australia, Canada, France, Germany, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. METHODS: Data from three sources are employed: OECD statistics, the Commonwealth Fund survey of individuals in each of ten countries, and country-specific documents on health care policies. Based on trends in OOP spending, we divide the ten countries into three groups and analyze both trends and access barriers accordingly. As part of this effort, we propose a conceptual model for understanding the key components of OOP spending. RESULTS: There is a great deal of variation in aggregate OOP spending per capita spending but there has been convergence over time, with the lowest-spending countries continuing to show growth and the highest spending countries showing stability. Both the level of aggregate OOP spending and changes in spending affect perceived access barriers, although there is not a perfect correspondence between the two. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need for better understanding the root causes of OOP spending. This will require data collection that is broken down into OOP resulting from cost sharing and OOP resulting from direct payments (due to underinsurance and lacking benefits). Moreover, data should be disaggregated by consumer groups (e.g. income-level or health status). Only then can we better link the data to specific policies and suggest effective solutions to policy makers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5960112
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59601122018-05-24 Revisiting out-of-pocket requirements: trends in spending, financial access barriers, and policy in ten high-income countries Rice, Thomas Quentin, Wilm Anell, Anders Barnes, Andrew J. Rosenau, Pauline Unruh, Lynn Y. van Ginneken, Ewout BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Countries rely on out-of-pocket (OOP) spending to different degrees and employ varying techniques. The article examines trends in OOP spending in ten high-income countries since 2000, and analyzes their relationship to self-assessed barriers to accessing health care services. The countries are Australia, Canada, France, Germany, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. METHODS: Data from three sources are employed: OECD statistics, the Commonwealth Fund survey of individuals in each of ten countries, and country-specific documents on health care policies. Based on trends in OOP spending, we divide the ten countries into three groups and analyze both trends and access barriers accordingly. As part of this effort, we propose a conceptual model for understanding the key components of OOP spending. RESULTS: There is a great deal of variation in aggregate OOP spending per capita spending but there has been convergence over time, with the lowest-spending countries continuing to show growth and the highest spending countries showing stability. Both the level of aggregate OOP spending and changes in spending affect perceived access barriers, although there is not a perfect correspondence between the two. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need for better understanding the root causes of OOP spending. This will require data collection that is broken down into OOP resulting from cost sharing and OOP resulting from direct payments (due to underinsurance and lacking benefits). Moreover, data should be disaggregated by consumer groups (e.g. income-level or health status). Only then can we better link the data to specific policies and suggest effective solutions to policy makers. BioMed Central 2018-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5960112/ /pubmed/29776404 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3185-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Rice, Thomas
Quentin, Wilm
Anell, Anders
Barnes, Andrew J.
Rosenau, Pauline
Unruh, Lynn Y.
van Ginneken, Ewout
Revisiting out-of-pocket requirements: trends in spending, financial access barriers, and policy in ten high-income countries
title Revisiting out-of-pocket requirements: trends in spending, financial access barriers, and policy in ten high-income countries
title_full Revisiting out-of-pocket requirements: trends in spending, financial access barriers, and policy in ten high-income countries
title_fullStr Revisiting out-of-pocket requirements: trends in spending, financial access barriers, and policy in ten high-income countries
title_full_unstemmed Revisiting out-of-pocket requirements: trends in spending, financial access barriers, and policy in ten high-income countries
title_short Revisiting out-of-pocket requirements: trends in spending, financial access barriers, and policy in ten high-income countries
title_sort revisiting out-of-pocket requirements: trends in spending, financial access barriers, and policy in ten high-income countries
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5960112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29776404
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3185-8
work_keys_str_mv AT ricethomas revisitingoutofpocketrequirementstrendsinspendingfinancialaccessbarriersandpolicyintenhighincomecountries
AT quentinwilm revisitingoutofpocketrequirementstrendsinspendingfinancialaccessbarriersandpolicyintenhighincomecountries
AT anellanders revisitingoutofpocketrequirementstrendsinspendingfinancialaccessbarriersandpolicyintenhighincomecountries
AT barnesandrewj revisitingoutofpocketrequirementstrendsinspendingfinancialaccessbarriersandpolicyintenhighincomecountries
AT rosenaupauline revisitingoutofpocketrequirementstrendsinspendingfinancialaccessbarriersandpolicyintenhighincomecountries
AT unruhlynny revisitingoutofpocketrequirementstrendsinspendingfinancialaccessbarriersandpolicyintenhighincomecountries
AT vanginnekenewout revisitingoutofpocketrequirementstrendsinspendingfinancialaccessbarriersandpolicyintenhighincomecountries