Cargando…
The impact of contour variation on tumour control probability in anal cancer
BACKGROUND: While intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) has been widely adopted for the treatment of anal cancer (AC), the added contour complexity poses potential risks. This study investigates the impact of contour variation on tumour control probability (TCP) when using IMRT for AC. METHODS: Ni...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5960192/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29776418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-018-1033-y |
_version_ | 1783324545667563520 |
---|---|
author | Jones, Michael P. Martin, Jarad Foo, Kerwyn Estoesta, Patrick Holloway, Lois Jameson, Michael |
author_facet | Jones, Michael P. Martin, Jarad Foo, Kerwyn Estoesta, Patrick Holloway, Lois Jameson, Michael |
author_sort | Jones, Michael P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: While intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) has been widely adopted for the treatment of anal cancer (AC), the added contour complexity poses potential risks. This study investigates the impact of contour variation on tumour control probability (TCP) when using IMRT for AC. METHODS: Nine Australian centres contoured a single computed tomography dataset of a patient with AC. The same optimised template-based IMRT planning protocol was applied to each contour set to generate nine representative treatment plans and their corresponding dose volume histograms. A geometric analysis was performed on all contours. The TCP was calculated for each plan using the linear quadratic and logitEUD model. RESULTS: The median concordance index (CI) for the bladder, head and neck of femur, bone marrow, small bowel and external genitalia was 0.94, 0.88, 0.84, 0.65 and 0.65, respectively. The median CI for the involved nodal, primary tumour and elective clinical target volumes were 0.85, 0.77 and 0.71, respectively. Across the nine plans, the TCP was not significantly different. Variation in TCP between plans increased as tumour cell load increased or radiation dose decreased. CONCLUSIONS: When using IMRT for AC, contour variations generated from a common protocol within the limits of minor deviations do not appear to have a significant impact on TCP. Contouring variations may be more critical with increasing tumour cell load or reducing radiotherapy dose. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5960192 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59601922018-05-24 The impact of contour variation on tumour control probability in anal cancer Jones, Michael P. Martin, Jarad Foo, Kerwyn Estoesta, Patrick Holloway, Lois Jameson, Michael Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: While intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) has been widely adopted for the treatment of anal cancer (AC), the added contour complexity poses potential risks. This study investigates the impact of contour variation on tumour control probability (TCP) when using IMRT for AC. METHODS: Nine Australian centres contoured a single computed tomography dataset of a patient with AC. The same optimised template-based IMRT planning protocol was applied to each contour set to generate nine representative treatment plans and their corresponding dose volume histograms. A geometric analysis was performed on all contours. The TCP was calculated for each plan using the linear quadratic and logitEUD model. RESULTS: The median concordance index (CI) for the bladder, head and neck of femur, bone marrow, small bowel and external genitalia was 0.94, 0.88, 0.84, 0.65 and 0.65, respectively. The median CI for the involved nodal, primary tumour and elective clinical target volumes were 0.85, 0.77 and 0.71, respectively. Across the nine plans, the TCP was not significantly different. Variation in TCP between plans increased as tumour cell load increased or radiation dose decreased. CONCLUSIONS: When using IMRT for AC, contour variations generated from a common protocol within the limits of minor deviations do not appear to have a significant impact on TCP. Contouring variations may be more critical with increasing tumour cell load or reducing radiotherapy dose. BioMed Central 2018-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5960192/ /pubmed/29776418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-018-1033-y Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Jones, Michael P. Martin, Jarad Foo, Kerwyn Estoesta, Patrick Holloway, Lois Jameson, Michael The impact of contour variation on tumour control probability in anal cancer |
title | The impact of contour variation on tumour control probability in anal cancer |
title_full | The impact of contour variation on tumour control probability in anal cancer |
title_fullStr | The impact of contour variation on tumour control probability in anal cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | The impact of contour variation on tumour control probability in anal cancer |
title_short | The impact of contour variation on tumour control probability in anal cancer |
title_sort | impact of contour variation on tumour control probability in anal cancer |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5960192/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29776418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-018-1033-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jonesmichaelp theimpactofcontourvariationontumourcontrolprobabilityinanalcancer AT martinjarad theimpactofcontourvariationontumourcontrolprobabilityinanalcancer AT fookerwyn theimpactofcontourvariationontumourcontrolprobabilityinanalcancer AT estoestapatrick theimpactofcontourvariationontumourcontrolprobabilityinanalcancer AT hollowaylois theimpactofcontourvariationontumourcontrolprobabilityinanalcancer AT jamesonmichael theimpactofcontourvariationontumourcontrolprobabilityinanalcancer AT jonesmichaelp impactofcontourvariationontumourcontrolprobabilityinanalcancer AT martinjarad impactofcontourvariationontumourcontrolprobabilityinanalcancer AT fookerwyn impactofcontourvariationontumourcontrolprobabilityinanalcancer AT estoestapatrick impactofcontourvariationontumourcontrolprobabilityinanalcancer AT hollowaylois impactofcontourvariationontumourcontrolprobabilityinanalcancer AT jamesonmichael impactofcontourvariationontumourcontrolprobabilityinanalcancer |