Cargando…

The impact of contour variation on tumour control probability in anal cancer

BACKGROUND: While intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) has been widely adopted for the treatment of anal cancer (AC), the added contour complexity poses potential risks. This study investigates the impact of contour variation on tumour control probability (TCP) when using IMRT for AC. METHODS: Ni...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jones, Michael P., Martin, Jarad, Foo, Kerwyn, Estoesta, Patrick, Holloway, Lois, Jameson, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5960192/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29776418
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-018-1033-y
_version_ 1783324545667563520
author Jones, Michael P.
Martin, Jarad
Foo, Kerwyn
Estoesta, Patrick
Holloway, Lois
Jameson, Michael
author_facet Jones, Michael P.
Martin, Jarad
Foo, Kerwyn
Estoesta, Patrick
Holloway, Lois
Jameson, Michael
author_sort Jones, Michael P.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: While intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) has been widely adopted for the treatment of anal cancer (AC), the added contour complexity poses potential risks. This study investigates the impact of contour variation on tumour control probability (TCP) when using IMRT for AC. METHODS: Nine Australian centres contoured a single computed tomography dataset of a patient with AC. The same optimised template-based IMRT planning protocol was applied to each contour set to generate nine representative treatment plans and their corresponding dose volume histograms. A geometric analysis was performed on all contours. The TCP was calculated for each plan using the linear quadratic and logitEUD model. RESULTS: The median concordance index (CI) for the bladder, head and neck of femur, bone marrow, small bowel and external genitalia was 0.94, 0.88, 0.84, 0.65 and 0.65, respectively. The median CI for the involved nodal, primary tumour and elective clinical target volumes were 0.85, 0.77 and 0.71, respectively. Across the nine plans, the TCP was not significantly different. Variation in TCP between plans increased as tumour cell load increased or radiation dose decreased. CONCLUSIONS: When using IMRT for AC, contour variations generated from a common protocol within the limits of minor deviations do not appear to have a significant impact on TCP. Contouring variations may be more critical with increasing tumour cell load or reducing radiotherapy dose.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5960192
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59601922018-05-24 The impact of contour variation on tumour control probability in anal cancer Jones, Michael P. Martin, Jarad Foo, Kerwyn Estoesta, Patrick Holloway, Lois Jameson, Michael Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: While intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) has been widely adopted for the treatment of anal cancer (AC), the added contour complexity poses potential risks. This study investigates the impact of contour variation on tumour control probability (TCP) when using IMRT for AC. METHODS: Nine Australian centres contoured a single computed tomography dataset of a patient with AC. The same optimised template-based IMRT planning protocol was applied to each contour set to generate nine representative treatment plans and their corresponding dose volume histograms. A geometric analysis was performed on all contours. The TCP was calculated for each plan using the linear quadratic and logitEUD model. RESULTS: The median concordance index (CI) for the bladder, head and neck of femur, bone marrow, small bowel and external genitalia was 0.94, 0.88, 0.84, 0.65 and 0.65, respectively. The median CI for the involved nodal, primary tumour and elective clinical target volumes were 0.85, 0.77 and 0.71, respectively. Across the nine plans, the TCP was not significantly different. Variation in TCP between plans increased as tumour cell load increased or radiation dose decreased. CONCLUSIONS: When using IMRT for AC, contour variations generated from a common protocol within the limits of minor deviations do not appear to have a significant impact on TCP. Contouring variations may be more critical with increasing tumour cell load or reducing radiotherapy dose. BioMed Central 2018-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5960192/ /pubmed/29776418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-018-1033-y Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Jones, Michael P.
Martin, Jarad
Foo, Kerwyn
Estoesta, Patrick
Holloway, Lois
Jameson, Michael
The impact of contour variation on tumour control probability in anal cancer
title The impact of contour variation on tumour control probability in anal cancer
title_full The impact of contour variation on tumour control probability in anal cancer
title_fullStr The impact of contour variation on tumour control probability in anal cancer
title_full_unstemmed The impact of contour variation on tumour control probability in anal cancer
title_short The impact of contour variation on tumour control probability in anal cancer
title_sort impact of contour variation on tumour control probability in anal cancer
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5960192/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29776418
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-018-1033-y
work_keys_str_mv AT jonesmichaelp theimpactofcontourvariationontumourcontrolprobabilityinanalcancer
AT martinjarad theimpactofcontourvariationontumourcontrolprobabilityinanalcancer
AT fookerwyn theimpactofcontourvariationontumourcontrolprobabilityinanalcancer
AT estoestapatrick theimpactofcontourvariationontumourcontrolprobabilityinanalcancer
AT hollowaylois theimpactofcontourvariationontumourcontrolprobabilityinanalcancer
AT jamesonmichael theimpactofcontourvariationontumourcontrolprobabilityinanalcancer
AT jonesmichaelp impactofcontourvariationontumourcontrolprobabilityinanalcancer
AT martinjarad impactofcontourvariationontumourcontrolprobabilityinanalcancer
AT fookerwyn impactofcontourvariationontumourcontrolprobabilityinanalcancer
AT estoestapatrick impactofcontourvariationontumourcontrolprobabilityinanalcancer
AT hollowaylois impactofcontourvariationontumourcontrolprobabilityinanalcancer
AT jamesonmichael impactofcontourvariationontumourcontrolprobabilityinanalcancer