Cargando…
Simulation-based power calculations for planning a two-stage individual participant data meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Researchers and funders should consider the statistical power of planned Individual Participant Data (IPD) meta-analysis projects, as they are often time-consuming and costly. We propose simulation-based power calculations utilising a two-stage framework, and illustrate the approach for...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5960205/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29776399 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0492-z |
_version_ | 1783324548771348480 |
---|---|
author | Ensor, Joie Burke, Danielle L. Snell, Kym I. E. Hemming, Karla Riley, Richard D. |
author_facet | Ensor, Joie Burke, Danielle L. Snell, Kym I. E. Hemming, Karla Riley, Richard D. |
author_sort | Ensor, Joie |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Researchers and funders should consider the statistical power of planned Individual Participant Data (IPD) meta-analysis projects, as they are often time-consuming and costly. We propose simulation-based power calculations utilising a two-stage framework, and illustrate the approach for a planned IPD meta-analysis of randomised trials with continuous outcomes where the aim is to identify treatment-covariate interactions. METHODS: The simulation approach has four steps: (i) specify an underlying (data generating) statistical model for trials in the IPD meta-analysis; (ii) use readily available information (e.g. from publications) and prior knowledge (e.g. number of studies promising IPD) to specify model parameter values (e.g. control group mean, intervention effect, treatment-covariate interaction); (iii) simulate an IPD meta-analysis dataset of a particular size from the model, and apply a two-stage IPD meta-analysis to obtain the summary estimate of interest (e.g. interaction effect) and its associated p-value; (iv) repeat the previous step (e.g. thousands of times), then estimate the power to detect a genuine effect by the proportion of summary estimates with a significant p-value. RESULTS: In a planned IPD meta-analysis of lifestyle interventions to reduce weight gain in pregnancy, 14 trials (1183 patients) promised their IPD to examine a treatment-BMI interaction (i.e. whether baseline BMI modifies intervention effect on weight gain). Using our simulation-based approach, a two-stage IPD meta-analysis has < 60% power to detect a reduction of 1 kg weight gain for a 10-unit increase in BMI. Additional IPD from ten other published trials (containing 1761 patients) would improve power to over 80%, but only if a fixed-effect meta-analysis was appropriate. Pre-specified adjustment for prognostic factors would increase power further. Incorrect dichotomisation of BMI would reduce power by over 20%, similar to immediately throwing away IPD from ten trials. CONCLUSIONS: Simulation-based power calculations could inform the planning and funding of IPD projects, and should be used routinely. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12874-018-0492-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5960205 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59602052018-05-24 Simulation-based power calculations for planning a two-stage individual participant data meta-analysis Ensor, Joie Burke, Danielle L. Snell, Kym I. E. Hemming, Karla Riley, Richard D. BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: Researchers and funders should consider the statistical power of planned Individual Participant Data (IPD) meta-analysis projects, as they are often time-consuming and costly. We propose simulation-based power calculations utilising a two-stage framework, and illustrate the approach for a planned IPD meta-analysis of randomised trials with continuous outcomes where the aim is to identify treatment-covariate interactions. METHODS: The simulation approach has four steps: (i) specify an underlying (data generating) statistical model for trials in the IPD meta-analysis; (ii) use readily available information (e.g. from publications) and prior knowledge (e.g. number of studies promising IPD) to specify model parameter values (e.g. control group mean, intervention effect, treatment-covariate interaction); (iii) simulate an IPD meta-analysis dataset of a particular size from the model, and apply a two-stage IPD meta-analysis to obtain the summary estimate of interest (e.g. interaction effect) and its associated p-value; (iv) repeat the previous step (e.g. thousands of times), then estimate the power to detect a genuine effect by the proportion of summary estimates with a significant p-value. RESULTS: In a planned IPD meta-analysis of lifestyle interventions to reduce weight gain in pregnancy, 14 trials (1183 patients) promised their IPD to examine a treatment-BMI interaction (i.e. whether baseline BMI modifies intervention effect on weight gain). Using our simulation-based approach, a two-stage IPD meta-analysis has < 60% power to detect a reduction of 1 kg weight gain for a 10-unit increase in BMI. Additional IPD from ten other published trials (containing 1761 patients) would improve power to over 80%, but only if a fixed-effect meta-analysis was appropriate. Pre-specified adjustment for prognostic factors would increase power further. Incorrect dichotomisation of BMI would reduce power by over 20%, similar to immediately throwing away IPD from ten trials. CONCLUSIONS: Simulation-based power calculations could inform the planning and funding of IPD projects, and should be used routinely. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12874-018-0492-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5960205/ /pubmed/29776399 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0492-z Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ensor, Joie Burke, Danielle L. Snell, Kym I. E. Hemming, Karla Riley, Richard D. Simulation-based power calculations for planning a two-stage individual participant data meta-analysis |
title | Simulation-based power calculations for planning a two-stage individual participant data meta-analysis |
title_full | Simulation-based power calculations for planning a two-stage individual participant data meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Simulation-based power calculations for planning a two-stage individual participant data meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Simulation-based power calculations for planning a two-stage individual participant data meta-analysis |
title_short | Simulation-based power calculations for planning a two-stage individual participant data meta-analysis |
title_sort | simulation-based power calculations for planning a two-stage individual participant data meta-analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5960205/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29776399 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0492-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ensorjoie simulationbasedpowercalculationsforplanningatwostageindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis AT burkedaniellel simulationbasedpowercalculationsforplanningatwostageindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis AT snellkymie simulationbasedpowercalculationsforplanningatwostageindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis AT hemmingkarla simulationbasedpowercalculationsforplanningatwostageindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis AT rileyrichardd simulationbasedpowercalculationsforplanningatwostageindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis |