Cargando…

Can deep transcranial magnetic stimulation (DTMS) be used to treat substance use disorders (SUD)? A systematic review

BACKGROUND: Deep transcranial magnetic stimulation (DTMS) is a non-invasive method of stimulating widespread cortical areas and, presumably, deeper neural networks. The current study assessed the effects of DTMS in the treatment of substance use disorders (SUD) using a systematic review. METHODS: El...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kedzior, Karina Karolina, Gerkensmeier, Imke, Schuchinsky, Maria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5960210/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29776355
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-018-1704-0
_version_ 1783324549919539200
author Kedzior, Karina Karolina
Gerkensmeier, Imke
Schuchinsky, Maria
author_facet Kedzior, Karina Karolina
Gerkensmeier, Imke
Schuchinsky, Maria
author_sort Kedzior, Karina Karolina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Deep transcranial magnetic stimulation (DTMS) is a non-invasive method of stimulating widespread cortical areas and, presumably, deeper neural networks. The current study assessed the effects of DTMS in the treatment of substance use disorders (SUD) using a systematic review. METHODS: Electronic literature search (PsycInfo, Medline until April 2017) identified k = 9 studies (k = 4 randomized-controlled trials, RCTs, with inactive sham and k = 5 open-label studies). DTMS was most commonly applied using high frequency/intensity (10–20 Hz/100–120% of the resting motor threshold, MT) protocols for 10–20 daily sessions in cases with alcohol, nicotine or cocaine use disorders. The outcome measures were craving and dependence (according to standardized scales) or consumption (frequency, abstinence or results of biological assays) at the end of the daily treatment phases and at the last follow-up. RESULTS: Acute and longer-term (6–12 months) reductions in alcohol craving were observed after 20 sessions (20 Hz, 120% MT) relative to baseline in k = 4 open-label studies with comorbid SUD and major depressive disorder (MDD). In k = 2 RCTs without MDD, alcohol consumption acutely decreased after 10–12 sessions (10–20 Hz, 100–120% MT) relative to baseline or to sham. Alcohol craving was reduced only after higher frequency/intensity DTMS (20 Hz, 120% MT) relative to sham in k = 1 RCT. Nicotine consumption was reduced and abstinence was increased after 13 sessions (10 Hz, 120% MT) and at the 6-month follow-up relative to sham in k = 1 RCT. Cocaine craving was reduced after 12 sessions (15 Hz, 100% MT) and at the 2-month follow-up relative to baseline in k = 1 open-label study while consumption was reduced after 12 sessions (10 Hz, 100% MT) relative to baseline but not to sham in k = 1 RCT. CONCLUSIONS: High-frequency DTMS may be effective at treating some SUD both acutely and in the longer-term. Large RCTs with inactive sham are required to determine the efficacy and the optimal stimulation parameters of DTMS for the treatment of SUD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5960210
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59602102018-05-24 Can deep transcranial magnetic stimulation (DTMS) be used to treat substance use disorders (SUD)? A systematic review Kedzior, Karina Karolina Gerkensmeier, Imke Schuchinsky, Maria BMC Psychiatry Research Article BACKGROUND: Deep transcranial magnetic stimulation (DTMS) is a non-invasive method of stimulating widespread cortical areas and, presumably, deeper neural networks. The current study assessed the effects of DTMS in the treatment of substance use disorders (SUD) using a systematic review. METHODS: Electronic literature search (PsycInfo, Medline until April 2017) identified k = 9 studies (k = 4 randomized-controlled trials, RCTs, with inactive sham and k = 5 open-label studies). DTMS was most commonly applied using high frequency/intensity (10–20 Hz/100–120% of the resting motor threshold, MT) protocols for 10–20 daily sessions in cases with alcohol, nicotine or cocaine use disorders. The outcome measures were craving and dependence (according to standardized scales) or consumption (frequency, abstinence or results of biological assays) at the end of the daily treatment phases and at the last follow-up. RESULTS: Acute and longer-term (6–12 months) reductions in alcohol craving were observed after 20 sessions (20 Hz, 120% MT) relative to baseline in k = 4 open-label studies with comorbid SUD and major depressive disorder (MDD). In k = 2 RCTs without MDD, alcohol consumption acutely decreased after 10–12 sessions (10–20 Hz, 100–120% MT) relative to baseline or to sham. Alcohol craving was reduced only after higher frequency/intensity DTMS (20 Hz, 120% MT) relative to sham in k = 1 RCT. Nicotine consumption was reduced and abstinence was increased after 13 sessions (10 Hz, 120% MT) and at the 6-month follow-up relative to sham in k = 1 RCT. Cocaine craving was reduced after 12 sessions (15 Hz, 100% MT) and at the 2-month follow-up relative to baseline in k = 1 open-label study while consumption was reduced after 12 sessions (10 Hz, 100% MT) relative to baseline but not to sham in k = 1 RCT. CONCLUSIONS: High-frequency DTMS may be effective at treating some SUD both acutely and in the longer-term. Large RCTs with inactive sham are required to determine the efficacy and the optimal stimulation parameters of DTMS for the treatment of SUD. BioMed Central 2018-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5960210/ /pubmed/29776355 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-018-1704-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kedzior, Karina Karolina
Gerkensmeier, Imke
Schuchinsky, Maria
Can deep transcranial magnetic stimulation (DTMS) be used to treat substance use disorders (SUD)? A systematic review
title Can deep transcranial magnetic stimulation (DTMS) be used to treat substance use disorders (SUD)? A systematic review
title_full Can deep transcranial magnetic stimulation (DTMS) be used to treat substance use disorders (SUD)? A systematic review
title_fullStr Can deep transcranial magnetic stimulation (DTMS) be used to treat substance use disorders (SUD)? A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Can deep transcranial magnetic stimulation (DTMS) be used to treat substance use disorders (SUD)? A systematic review
title_short Can deep transcranial magnetic stimulation (DTMS) be used to treat substance use disorders (SUD)? A systematic review
title_sort can deep transcranial magnetic stimulation (dtms) be used to treat substance use disorders (sud)? a systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5960210/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29776355
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-018-1704-0
work_keys_str_mv AT kedziorkarinakarolina candeeptranscranialmagneticstimulationdtmsbeusedtotreatsubstanceusedisorderssudasystematicreview
AT gerkensmeierimke candeeptranscranialmagneticstimulationdtmsbeusedtotreatsubstanceusedisorderssudasystematicreview
AT schuchinskymaria candeeptranscranialmagneticstimulationdtmsbeusedtotreatsubstanceusedisorderssudasystematicreview