Cargando…
A comparison of cotton and flocked swabs for vaginal self-sample collection
OBJECTIVE: Vaginal self-sampling for human papillomavirus (HPV) testing has recently been proposed to optimize cervical cancer screening coverage. The objective of this study was to compare the performance of self-taken samples using flocked and cotton swabs for HPV detection and cellular retrieval....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5960235/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29805267 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S157897 |
_version_ | 1783324555529420800 |
---|---|
author | Viviano, Manuela Willame, Alexia Cohen, Marie Benski, Anne-Caroline Catarino, Rosa Wuillemin, Christine Tran, Phuong Lien Petignat, Patrick Vassilakos, Pierre |
author_facet | Viviano, Manuela Willame, Alexia Cohen, Marie Benski, Anne-Caroline Catarino, Rosa Wuillemin, Christine Tran, Phuong Lien Petignat, Patrick Vassilakos, Pierre |
author_sort | Viviano, Manuela |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Vaginal self-sampling for human papillomavirus (HPV) testing has recently been proposed to optimize cervical cancer screening coverage. The objective of this study was to compare the performance of self-taken samples using flocked and cotton swabs for HPV detection and cellular retrieval. METHODS: We recruited women aged 21–65 years, referred to colposcopy at the Division of Gynecology of the Geneva University Hospitals between May and September 2016. Each participant collected 2 vaginal samples: 1 with a cotton swab and 1 with a flocked swab. A 1:1 randomization determined the order in which the 2 samples were taken. The swabs were introduced into a 20 mL PreservCyt(®) vial. Real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis using the Anyplex™ II HPV HR assay, cytofluorometric analysis and cytological cell counting were performed on each sample. RESULTS: A total of 119 participants were recruited in the study. Their mean ± standard deviation age was 35.1±8.9 years. The HPV prevalence was 29.7% and 38.1% according to the cotton and flocked swab, respectively (p=0.006). The mean number of cells collected per milliliter according to cytofluorometry was 96,726.6 with the cotton swab and 425,544.3 with the flocked swab (p<0.001). The mean number of cells detected at cytological cell count was 13,130.42 using the cotton swab and 17,503.6 using the flocked swab (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The flocked swab achieved a greater cellular retrieval and showed an improved performance in HPV detection. Further studies are needed to assess the usability and cost-effectiveness of the 2 self-sampling devices. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5960235 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59602352018-05-25 A comparison of cotton and flocked swabs for vaginal self-sample collection Viviano, Manuela Willame, Alexia Cohen, Marie Benski, Anne-Caroline Catarino, Rosa Wuillemin, Christine Tran, Phuong Lien Petignat, Patrick Vassilakos, Pierre Int J Womens Health Original Research OBJECTIVE: Vaginal self-sampling for human papillomavirus (HPV) testing has recently been proposed to optimize cervical cancer screening coverage. The objective of this study was to compare the performance of self-taken samples using flocked and cotton swabs for HPV detection and cellular retrieval. METHODS: We recruited women aged 21–65 years, referred to colposcopy at the Division of Gynecology of the Geneva University Hospitals between May and September 2016. Each participant collected 2 vaginal samples: 1 with a cotton swab and 1 with a flocked swab. A 1:1 randomization determined the order in which the 2 samples were taken. The swabs were introduced into a 20 mL PreservCyt(®) vial. Real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis using the Anyplex™ II HPV HR assay, cytofluorometric analysis and cytological cell counting were performed on each sample. RESULTS: A total of 119 participants were recruited in the study. Their mean ± standard deviation age was 35.1±8.9 years. The HPV prevalence was 29.7% and 38.1% according to the cotton and flocked swab, respectively (p=0.006). The mean number of cells collected per milliliter according to cytofluorometry was 96,726.6 with the cotton swab and 425,544.3 with the flocked swab (p<0.001). The mean number of cells detected at cytological cell count was 13,130.42 using the cotton swab and 17,503.6 using the flocked swab (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The flocked swab achieved a greater cellular retrieval and showed an improved performance in HPV detection. Further studies are needed to assess the usability and cost-effectiveness of the 2 self-sampling devices. Dove Medical Press 2018-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5960235/ /pubmed/29805267 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S157897 Text en © 2018 Viviano et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Viviano, Manuela Willame, Alexia Cohen, Marie Benski, Anne-Caroline Catarino, Rosa Wuillemin, Christine Tran, Phuong Lien Petignat, Patrick Vassilakos, Pierre A comparison of cotton and flocked swabs for vaginal self-sample collection |
title | A comparison of cotton and flocked swabs for vaginal self-sample collection |
title_full | A comparison of cotton and flocked swabs for vaginal self-sample collection |
title_fullStr | A comparison of cotton and flocked swabs for vaginal self-sample collection |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparison of cotton and flocked swabs for vaginal self-sample collection |
title_short | A comparison of cotton and flocked swabs for vaginal self-sample collection |
title_sort | comparison of cotton and flocked swabs for vaginal self-sample collection |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5960235/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29805267 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S157897 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vivianomanuela acomparisonofcottonandflockedswabsforvaginalselfsamplecollection AT willamealexia acomparisonofcottonandflockedswabsforvaginalselfsamplecollection AT cohenmarie acomparisonofcottonandflockedswabsforvaginalselfsamplecollection AT benskiannecaroline acomparisonofcottonandflockedswabsforvaginalselfsamplecollection AT catarinorosa acomparisonofcottonandflockedswabsforvaginalselfsamplecollection AT wuilleminchristine acomparisonofcottonandflockedswabsforvaginalselfsamplecollection AT tranphuonglien acomparisonofcottonandflockedswabsforvaginalselfsamplecollection AT petignatpatrick acomparisonofcottonandflockedswabsforvaginalselfsamplecollection AT vassilakospierre acomparisonofcottonandflockedswabsforvaginalselfsamplecollection AT vivianomanuela comparisonofcottonandflockedswabsforvaginalselfsamplecollection AT willamealexia comparisonofcottonandflockedswabsforvaginalselfsamplecollection AT cohenmarie comparisonofcottonandflockedswabsforvaginalselfsamplecollection AT benskiannecaroline comparisonofcottonandflockedswabsforvaginalselfsamplecollection AT catarinorosa comparisonofcottonandflockedswabsforvaginalselfsamplecollection AT wuilleminchristine comparisonofcottonandflockedswabsforvaginalselfsamplecollection AT tranphuonglien comparisonofcottonandflockedswabsforvaginalselfsamplecollection AT petignatpatrick comparisonofcottonandflockedswabsforvaginalselfsamplecollection AT vassilakospierre comparisonofcottonandflockedswabsforvaginalselfsamplecollection |