Cargando…
Global trends in emerging infectious diseases
Emerging infectious diseases (EIDs) are a significant burden on global economies and public health(1,2,3). Their emergence is thought to be driven largely by socio-economic, environmental and ecological factors(1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9), but no comparative study has explicitly analysed these linkages to un...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5960580/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18288193 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature06536 |
_version_ | 1783324610473754624 |
---|---|
author | Jones, Kate E. Patel, Nikkita G. Levy, Marc A. Storeygard, Adam Balk, Deborah Gittleman, John L. Daszak, Peter |
author_facet | Jones, Kate E. Patel, Nikkita G. Levy, Marc A. Storeygard, Adam Balk, Deborah Gittleman, John L. Daszak, Peter |
author_sort | Jones, Kate E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Emerging infectious diseases (EIDs) are a significant burden on global economies and public health(1,2,3). Their emergence is thought to be driven largely by socio-economic, environmental and ecological factors(1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9), but no comparative study has explicitly analysed these linkages to understand global temporal and spatial patterns of EIDs. Here we analyse a database of 335 EID ‘events’ (origins of EIDs) between 1940 and 2004, and demonstrate non-random global patterns. EID events have risen significantly over time after controlling for reporting bias, with their peak incidence (in the 1980s) concomitant with the HIV pandemic. EID events are dominated by zoonoses (60.3% of EIDs): the majority of these (71.8%) originate in wildlife (for example, severe acute respiratory virus, Ebola virus), and are increasing significantly over time. We find that 54.3% of EID events are caused by bacteria or rickettsia, reflecting a large number of drug-resistant microbes in our database. Our results confirm that EID origins are significantly correlated with socio-economic, environmental and ecological factors, and provide a basis for identifying regions where new EIDs are most likely to originate (emerging disease ‘hotspots’). They also reveal a substantial risk of wildlife zoonotic and vector-borne EIDs originating at lower latitudes where reporting effort is low. We conclude that global resources to counter disease emergence are poorly allocated, with the majority of the scientific and surveillance effort focused on countries from where the next important EID is least likely to originate. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version of this article (doi:10.1038/nature06536) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5960580 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59605802018-05-20 Global trends in emerging infectious diseases Jones, Kate E. Patel, Nikkita G. Levy, Marc A. Storeygard, Adam Balk, Deborah Gittleman, John L. Daszak, Peter Nature Article Emerging infectious diseases (EIDs) are a significant burden on global economies and public health(1,2,3). Their emergence is thought to be driven largely by socio-economic, environmental and ecological factors(1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9), but no comparative study has explicitly analysed these linkages to understand global temporal and spatial patterns of EIDs. Here we analyse a database of 335 EID ‘events’ (origins of EIDs) between 1940 and 2004, and demonstrate non-random global patterns. EID events have risen significantly over time after controlling for reporting bias, with their peak incidence (in the 1980s) concomitant with the HIV pandemic. EID events are dominated by zoonoses (60.3% of EIDs): the majority of these (71.8%) originate in wildlife (for example, severe acute respiratory virus, Ebola virus), and are increasing significantly over time. We find that 54.3% of EID events are caused by bacteria or rickettsia, reflecting a large number of drug-resistant microbes in our database. Our results confirm that EID origins are significantly correlated with socio-economic, environmental and ecological factors, and provide a basis for identifying regions where new EIDs are most likely to originate (emerging disease ‘hotspots’). They also reveal a substantial risk of wildlife zoonotic and vector-borne EIDs originating at lower latitudes where reporting effort is low. We conclude that global resources to counter disease emergence are poorly allocated, with the majority of the scientific and surveillance effort focused on countries from where the next important EID is least likely to originate. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version of this article (doi:10.1038/nature06536) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Nature Publishing Group UK 2008 /pmc/articles/PMC5960580/ /pubmed/18288193 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature06536 Text en © Nature Publishing Group 2008 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Article Jones, Kate E. Patel, Nikkita G. Levy, Marc A. Storeygard, Adam Balk, Deborah Gittleman, John L. Daszak, Peter Global trends in emerging infectious diseases |
title | Global trends in emerging infectious diseases |
title_full | Global trends in emerging infectious diseases |
title_fullStr | Global trends in emerging infectious diseases |
title_full_unstemmed | Global trends in emerging infectious diseases |
title_short | Global trends in emerging infectious diseases |
title_sort | global trends in emerging infectious diseases |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5960580/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18288193 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature06536 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT joneskatee globaltrendsinemerginginfectiousdiseases AT patelnikkitag globaltrendsinemerginginfectiousdiseases AT levymarca globaltrendsinemerginginfectiousdiseases AT storeygardadam globaltrendsinemerginginfectiousdiseases AT balkdeborah globaltrendsinemerginginfectiousdiseases AT gittlemanjohnl globaltrendsinemerginginfectiousdiseases AT daszakpeter globaltrendsinemerginginfectiousdiseases |