Cargando…

Interpreting (123)I–ioflupane dopamine transporter scans using hybrid scores

BACKGROUND: Dopamine transporter (DaT) (123)I–FP-CIT scans most commonly are interpreted visually. Alternatively, absolute quantitation of radiopharmaceutical uptake may improve scan accuracy. However, neither approach accomodates dependence of striatal uptake on age and gender. We investigated whet...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nichols, Kenneth J., Chen, Brandon, Tomas, Maria B., Palestro, Christopher J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5960650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29855627
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41824-018-0028-0
_version_ 1783324613819760640
author Nichols, Kenneth J.
Chen, Brandon
Tomas, Maria B.
Palestro, Christopher J.
author_facet Nichols, Kenneth J.
Chen, Brandon
Tomas, Maria B.
Palestro, Christopher J.
author_sort Nichols, Kenneth J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Dopamine transporter (DaT) (123)I–FP-CIT scans most commonly are interpreted visually. Alternatively, absolute quantitation of radiopharmaceutical uptake may improve scan accuracy. However, neither approach accomodates dependence of striatal uptake on age and gender. We investigated whether demographic indexing of visual and numerical variables improve discrimination of patients with essential tremor (ET), Parkinson’s disease (PD), and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB). METHODS: Data of 132 consecutive patients undergoing DaT SPECT scans were reviewed retrospectively. The clinical impression in the latest neurology note was utilized as the final clinical diagnosis. Caudate and putamen specific binding ratio (PSBR) were computed. (123)I calibration phantoms were constructed to enable absolute quantitation of putamen radiopharmaceutical uptake. A single experienced nuclear medicine physician graded visual certainty on a 3-level scale. Demographic indexing normalized metrics to published normal PSBR values. Methods were compared by simultaneous ROC analyses to identify the technique of maximal accuracy. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients (26%) were diagnosed with ET, 85 (64%) with PD, 6 (5%) with multiple system atrophy, and 7 (5%) with DLB. For discriminating DLB from PD, visual analysis was significantly less specific and accurate than the other techniques. However, indexing significantly improved specificity and accuracy of visual scores, such that indexed visual scores were statistically equivalent to all other methods. Indexed PSBR yielded essentially the same results as non-indexed PSBR, for which highest overall test efficacy was achieved. CONCLUSIONS: Our results in this small series of patients with DLB suggest that if (123)I–FP-CIT visual scores are to be used to discriminate DLB from other neurologic disorders, demographic indexing should be applied. However, best results overall are obtained using quantified parameters, regardless of whether or not demographic indexing is applied to these values.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5960650
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59606502018-05-29 Interpreting (123)I–ioflupane dopamine transporter scans using hybrid scores Nichols, Kenneth J. Chen, Brandon Tomas, Maria B. Palestro, Christopher J. Eur J Hybrid Imaging Original Article BACKGROUND: Dopamine transporter (DaT) (123)I–FP-CIT scans most commonly are interpreted visually. Alternatively, absolute quantitation of radiopharmaceutical uptake may improve scan accuracy. However, neither approach accomodates dependence of striatal uptake on age and gender. We investigated whether demographic indexing of visual and numerical variables improve discrimination of patients with essential tremor (ET), Parkinson’s disease (PD), and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB). METHODS: Data of 132 consecutive patients undergoing DaT SPECT scans were reviewed retrospectively. The clinical impression in the latest neurology note was utilized as the final clinical diagnosis. Caudate and putamen specific binding ratio (PSBR) were computed. (123)I calibration phantoms were constructed to enable absolute quantitation of putamen radiopharmaceutical uptake. A single experienced nuclear medicine physician graded visual certainty on a 3-level scale. Demographic indexing normalized metrics to published normal PSBR values. Methods were compared by simultaneous ROC analyses to identify the technique of maximal accuracy. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients (26%) were diagnosed with ET, 85 (64%) with PD, 6 (5%) with multiple system atrophy, and 7 (5%) with DLB. For discriminating DLB from PD, visual analysis was significantly less specific and accurate than the other techniques. However, indexing significantly improved specificity and accuracy of visual scores, such that indexed visual scores were statistically equivalent to all other methods. Indexed PSBR yielded essentially the same results as non-indexed PSBR, for which highest overall test efficacy was achieved. CONCLUSIONS: Our results in this small series of patients with DLB suggest that if (123)I–FP-CIT visual scores are to be used to discriminate DLB from other neurologic disorders, demographic indexing should be applied. However, best results overall are obtained using quantified parameters, regardless of whether or not demographic indexing is applied to these values. Springer International Publishing 2018-05-21 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5960650/ /pubmed/29855627 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41824-018-0028-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Nichols, Kenneth J.
Chen, Brandon
Tomas, Maria B.
Palestro, Christopher J.
Interpreting (123)I–ioflupane dopamine transporter scans using hybrid scores
title Interpreting (123)I–ioflupane dopamine transporter scans using hybrid scores
title_full Interpreting (123)I–ioflupane dopamine transporter scans using hybrid scores
title_fullStr Interpreting (123)I–ioflupane dopamine transporter scans using hybrid scores
title_full_unstemmed Interpreting (123)I–ioflupane dopamine transporter scans using hybrid scores
title_short Interpreting (123)I–ioflupane dopamine transporter scans using hybrid scores
title_sort interpreting (123)i–ioflupane dopamine transporter scans using hybrid scores
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5960650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29855627
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41824-018-0028-0
work_keys_str_mv AT nicholskennethj interpreting123iioflupanedopaminetransporterscansusinghybridscores
AT chenbrandon interpreting123iioflupanedopaminetransporterscansusinghybridscores
AT tomasmariab interpreting123iioflupanedopaminetransporterscansusinghybridscores
AT palestrochristopherj interpreting123iioflupanedopaminetransporterscansusinghybridscores