Cargando…

Inside help: An integrative review of champions in healthcare-related implementation

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The idea that champions are crucial to effective healthcare-related implementation has gained broad acceptance; yet the champion construct has been hampered by inconsistent use across the published literature. This integrative review sought to establish the current state of the lite...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miech, Edward J, Rattray, Nicholas A, Flanagan, Mindy E, Damschroder, Laura, Schmid, Arlene A, Damush, Teresa M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5960847/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29796266
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050312118773261
_version_ 1783324651868389376
author Miech, Edward J
Rattray, Nicholas A
Flanagan, Mindy E
Damschroder, Laura
Schmid, Arlene A
Damush, Teresa M
author_facet Miech, Edward J
Rattray, Nicholas A
Flanagan, Mindy E
Damschroder, Laura
Schmid, Arlene A
Damush, Teresa M
author_sort Miech, Edward J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/AIMS: The idea that champions are crucial to effective healthcare-related implementation has gained broad acceptance; yet the champion construct has been hampered by inconsistent use across the published literature. This integrative review sought to establish the current state of the literature on champions in healthcare settings and bring greater clarity to this important construct. METHODS: This integrative review was limited to research articles in peer-reviewed, English-language journals published from 1980 to 2016. Searches were conducted on the online MEDLINE database via OVID and PubMed using the keyword “champion.” Several additional terms often describe champions and were also included as keywords: implementation leader, opinion leader, facilitator, and change agent. Bibliographies of full-text articles that met inclusion criteria were reviewed for additional references not yet identified via the main strategy of conducting keyword searches in MEDLINE. A five-member team abstracted all full-text articles meeting inclusion criteria. RESULTS: The final dataset for the integrative review consisted of 199 unique articles. Use of the term champion varied widely across the articles with respect to topic, specific job positions, or broader organizational roles. The most common method for operationalizing champion for purposes of analysis was the use of a dichotomous variable designating champion presence or absence. Four studies randomly allocated of the presence or absence of champions. CONCLUSIONS: The number of published champion-related articles has markedly increased: more articles were published during the last two years of this review (i.e. 2015–2016) than during its first 30 years (i.e. 1980–2009). The number of champion-related articles has continued to increase sharply since the year 2000. Individual studies consistently found that champions were important positive influences on implementation effectiveness. Although few in number, the randomized trials of champions that have been conducted demonstrate the feasibility of using experimental design to study the effects of champions in healthcare.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5960847
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59608472018-05-24 Inside help: An integrative review of champions in healthcare-related implementation Miech, Edward J Rattray, Nicholas A Flanagan, Mindy E Damschroder, Laura Schmid, Arlene A Damush, Teresa M SAGE Open Med Systematic Review BACKGROUND/AIMS: The idea that champions are crucial to effective healthcare-related implementation has gained broad acceptance; yet the champion construct has been hampered by inconsistent use across the published literature. This integrative review sought to establish the current state of the literature on champions in healthcare settings and bring greater clarity to this important construct. METHODS: This integrative review was limited to research articles in peer-reviewed, English-language journals published from 1980 to 2016. Searches were conducted on the online MEDLINE database via OVID and PubMed using the keyword “champion.” Several additional terms often describe champions and were also included as keywords: implementation leader, opinion leader, facilitator, and change agent. Bibliographies of full-text articles that met inclusion criteria were reviewed for additional references not yet identified via the main strategy of conducting keyword searches in MEDLINE. A five-member team abstracted all full-text articles meeting inclusion criteria. RESULTS: The final dataset for the integrative review consisted of 199 unique articles. Use of the term champion varied widely across the articles with respect to topic, specific job positions, or broader organizational roles. The most common method for operationalizing champion for purposes of analysis was the use of a dichotomous variable designating champion presence or absence. Four studies randomly allocated of the presence or absence of champions. CONCLUSIONS: The number of published champion-related articles has markedly increased: more articles were published during the last two years of this review (i.e. 2015–2016) than during its first 30 years (i.e. 1980–2009). The number of champion-related articles has continued to increase sharply since the year 2000. Individual studies consistently found that champions were important positive influences on implementation effectiveness. Although few in number, the randomized trials of champions that have been conducted demonstrate the feasibility of using experimental design to study the effects of champions in healthcare. SAGE Publications 2018-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5960847/ /pubmed/29796266 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050312118773261 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Miech, Edward J
Rattray, Nicholas A
Flanagan, Mindy E
Damschroder, Laura
Schmid, Arlene A
Damush, Teresa M
Inside help: An integrative review of champions in healthcare-related implementation
title Inside help: An integrative review of champions in healthcare-related implementation
title_full Inside help: An integrative review of champions in healthcare-related implementation
title_fullStr Inside help: An integrative review of champions in healthcare-related implementation
title_full_unstemmed Inside help: An integrative review of champions in healthcare-related implementation
title_short Inside help: An integrative review of champions in healthcare-related implementation
title_sort inside help: an integrative review of champions in healthcare-related implementation
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5960847/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29796266
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050312118773261
work_keys_str_mv AT miechedwardj insidehelpanintegrativereviewofchampionsinhealthcarerelatedimplementation
AT rattraynicholasa insidehelpanintegrativereviewofchampionsinhealthcarerelatedimplementation
AT flanaganmindye insidehelpanintegrativereviewofchampionsinhealthcarerelatedimplementation
AT damschroderlaura insidehelpanintegrativereviewofchampionsinhealthcarerelatedimplementation
AT schmidarlenea insidehelpanintegrativereviewofchampionsinhealthcarerelatedimplementation
AT damushteresam insidehelpanintegrativereviewofchampionsinhealthcarerelatedimplementation