Cargando…

Tai Chi for Reducing Dual-task Gait Variability, a Potential Mediator of Fall Risk in Parkinson’s Disease: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVES: To assess the feasibility and inform design features of a fully powered randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluating the effects of Tai Chi (TC) in Parkinson’s disease (PD) and to select outcomes most responsive to TC assessed during off-medication states. DESIGN: Two-arm, wait-list cont...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vergara-Diaz, Gloria, Osypiuk, Kamila, Hausdorff, Jeffrey M, Bonato, Paolo, Gow, Brian J, Miranda, Jose GV, Sudarsky, Lewis R, Tarsy, Daniel, Fox, Michael D, Gardiner, Paula, Thomas, Cathi A, Macklin, Eric A, Wayne, Peter M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5960860/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29796338
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2164956118775385
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: To assess the feasibility and inform design features of a fully powered randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluating the effects of Tai Chi (TC) in Parkinson’s disease (PD) and to select outcomes most responsive to TC assessed during off-medication states. DESIGN: Two-arm, wait-list controlled RCT. SETTINGS: Tertiary care hospital. SUBJECTS: Thirty-two subjects aged 40–75 diagnosed with idiopathic PD within 10 years. INTERVENTIONS: Six-month TC intervention added to usual care (UC) versus UC alone. OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes were feasibility-related (recruitment rate, adherence, and compliance). Change in dual-task (DT) gait stride-time variability (STV) from baseline to 6 months was defined, a priori, as the clinical outcome measure of primary interest. Other outcomes included: PD motor symptom progression (Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale [UPDRS]), PD-related quality of life (PDQ-39), executive function (Trail Making Test), balance confidence (Activity-Specific Balance Confidence Scale, ABC), and Timed Up and Go test (TUG). All clinical assessments were made in the off-state for PD medications. RESULTS: Thirty-two subjects were enrolled into 3 sequential cohorts over 417 days at an average rate of 0.08 subjects per day. Seventy-five percent (12/16) in the TC group vs 94% (15/16) in the UC group completed the primary 6-month follow-up assessment. Mean TC exposure hours overall: 52. No AEs occurred during or as a direct result of TC exercise. Statistically nonsignificant improvements were observed in the TC group at 6 months in DT gait STV (TC [20.1%] vs UC [−0.1%] group [effect size 0.49; P = .47]), ABC, TUG, and PDQ-39. UPDRS progression was modest and very similar in TC and UC groups. CONCLUSIONS: Conducting an RCT of TC for PD is feasible, though measures to improve recruitment and adherence rates are needed. DT gait STV is a sensitive and logical outcome for evaluating the combined cognitive-motor effects of TC in PD.