Cargando…

Calcaneal Fractures – Should We or Should We not Operate?

The best treatment for displaced, intraarticular fractures of the calcaneum remains controversial. Surgical treatment of these injuries is challenging and have a considerable learning curve. Studies comparing operative with nonoperative treatment including randomized trials and meta-analyses are fra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rammelt, Stefan, Sangeorzan, Bruce J, Swords, Michael P
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5961258/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29887623
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_555_17
_version_ 1783324696458035200
author Rammelt, Stefan
Sangeorzan, Bruce J
Swords, Michael P
author_facet Rammelt, Stefan
Sangeorzan, Bruce J
Swords, Michael P
author_sort Rammelt, Stefan
collection PubMed
description The best treatment for displaced, intraarticular fractures of the calcaneum remains controversial. Surgical treatment of these injuries is challenging and have a considerable learning curve. Studies comparing operative with nonoperative treatment including randomized trials and meta-analyses are fraught with a considerable number of confounders including highly variable fracture patterns, soft-tissue conditions, patient characteristics, surgeon experience, limited sensitivity of outcome measures, and rehabilitation protocols. It has become apparent that there is no single treatment that is suitable for all calcaneal fractures. Treatment should be tailored to the individual fracture pathoanatomy, accompanying soft-tissue damage, associated injuries, functional demand, and comorbidities of the patient. If operative treatment is chosen, reconstruction of the overall shape of the calcaneum and joint surfaces are of utmost importance to obtain a good functional result. Despite meticulous reconstruction, primary cartilage damage due to the impact at the time of injury may lead to posttraumatic subtalar arthritis. Even if subtalar fusion becomes necessary, patients benefit from primary anatomical reconstruction of the hindfoot geometry because in situ fusion is easier to perform and associated with better results than corrective fusion for hindfoot deformities in malunited calcaneal fractures. To minimize wound healing problems and stiffness due to scar formation after open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) through extensile approaches several percutaneous and less invasive procedures through a direct approach over the sinus tarsi have successfully lowered the rates of infections and wound complications while ensuring exact anatomic reduction. There is evidence from multiple studies that malunited displaced calcaneal fractures result in painful arthritis and disabling, three-dimensional foot deformities for the affected patients. The poorest treatment results are reported after open surgical treatment that failed to achieve anatomic reconstruction of the calcaneum and its joints, thus combining the disadvantages of operative and nonoperative treatment. The crucial question, therefore, is not only whether to operate or not but also when and how to operate on calcaneal fractures if surgery is decided.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5961258
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59612582018-06-08 Calcaneal Fractures – Should We or Should We not Operate? Rammelt, Stefan Sangeorzan, Bruce J Swords, Michael P Indian J Orthop Symposium - Hindfoot and Ankle Trauma The best treatment for displaced, intraarticular fractures of the calcaneum remains controversial. Surgical treatment of these injuries is challenging and have a considerable learning curve. Studies comparing operative with nonoperative treatment including randomized trials and meta-analyses are fraught with a considerable number of confounders including highly variable fracture patterns, soft-tissue conditions, patient characteristics, surgeon experience, limited sensitivity of outcome measures, and rehabilitation protocols. It has become apparent that there is no single treatment that is suitable for all calcaneal fractures. Treatment should be tailored to the individual fracture pathoanatomy, accompanying soft-tissue damage, associated injuries, functional demand, and comorbidities of the patient. If operative treatment is chosen, reconstruction of the overall shape of the calcaneum and joint surfaces are of utmost importance to obtain a good functional result. Despite meticulous reconstruction, primary cartilage damage due to the impact at the time of injury may lead to posttraumatic subtalar arthritis. Even if subtalar fusion becomes necessary, patients benefit from primary anatomical reconstruction of the hindfoot geometry because in situ fusion is easier to perform and associated with better results than corrective fusion for hindfoot deformities in malunited calcaneal fractures. To minimize wound healing problems and stiffness due to scar formation after open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) through extensile approaches several percutaneous and less invasive procedures through a direct approach over the sinus tarsi have successfully lowered the rates of infections and wound complications while ensuring exact anatomic reduction. There is evidence from multiple studies that malunited displaced calcaneal fractures result in painful arthritis and disabling, three-dimensional foot deformities for the affected patients. The poorest treatment results are reported after open surgical treatment that failed to achieve anatomic reconstruction of the calcaneum and its joints, thus combining the disadvantages of operative and nonoperative treatment. The crucial question, therefore, is not only whether to operate or not but also when and how to operate on calcaneal fractures if surgery is decided. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5961258/ /pubmed/29887623 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_555_17 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Indian Journal of Orthopaedics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Symposium - Hindfoot and Ankle Trauma
Rammelt, Stefan
Sangeorzan, Bruce J
Swords, Michael P
Calcaneal Fractures – Should We or Should We not Operate?
title Calcaneal Fractures – Should We or Should We not Operate?
title_full Calcaneal Fractures – Should We or Should We not Operate?
title_fullStr Calcaneal Fractures – Should We or Should We not Operate?
title_full_unstemmed Calcaneal Fractures – Should We or Should We not Operate?
title_short Calcaneal Fractures – Should We or Should We not Operate?
title_sort calcaneal fractures – should we or should we not operate?
topic Symposium - Hindfoot and Ankle Trauma
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5961258/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29887623
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_555_17
work_keys_str_mv AT rammeltstefan calcanealfracturesshouldweorshouldwenotoperate
AT sangeorzanbrucej calcanealfracturesshouldweorshouldwenotoperate
AT swordsmichaelp calcanealfracturesshouldweorshouldwenotoperate