Cargando…
Adolescent self-consent for vaccinations: protocol for a mixed methods systematic review
INTRODUCTION: The recent global expansion of routine adolescent vaccination programmes has the potential to protect young people against the acquisition of infectious disease and improve their health. Although in many countries the legal framework supports young people to provide consent for medical...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5961593/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29780031 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021335 |
_version_ | 1783324743330430976 |
---|---|
author | Fisher, Harriet Hickman, Matthew Macleod, John Audrey, Suzanne |
author_facet | Fisher, Harriet Hickman, Matthew Macleod, John Audrey, Suzanne |
author_sort | Fisher, Harriet |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The recent global expansion of routine adolescent vaccination programmes has the potential to protect young people against the acquisition of infectious disease and improve their health. Although in many countries the legal framework supports young people to provide consent for medical interventions if they are considered competent, written parental consent can act as a barrier to uptake as it is frequently a condition of adolescent vaccination programmes. The aim of this systematic review protocol is to document the methods which will be used to identify, appraise and synthesise the available qualitative and quantitative evidence to address: (1) whether implementation of adolescent self-consent procedures can increase vaccination uptake and (2) the barriers and facilitators to implementation of adolescent self-consent procedures. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Comprehensive search strategy of all relevant electronic databases for both qualitative and quantitative studies using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. At least two authors will independently review titles and abstracts, extract data and assess the methodological quality of eligible primary studies, resolving disagreements by consensus. Quantitative studies will be reported narratively and where possible pooled in a meta-analysis using a random-effects model. The findings of qualitative primary studies will be extracted, interpreted and synthesised to identify overarching themes as well as similarities and differences within those themes. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: As this systematic review involves analysis of secondary data, the study does not require ethical approvals. We will use our findings to assess whether the evidence supports the hypothesis that self-consent procedures can increase coverage of adolescent vaccination programmes. We will identify barriers and facilitators to the implementation of adolescent self-consent for vaccination and make recommendations for policy makers and practitioners in relation to consent procedures within vaccination programmes for young people. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42017084509. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5961593 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59615932018-05-30 Adolescent self-consent for vaccinations: protocol for a mixed methods systematic review Fisher, Harriet Hickman, Matthew Macleod, John Audrey, Suzanne BMJ Open Infectious Diseases INTRODUCTION: The recent global expansion of routine adolescent vaccination programmes has the potential to protect young people against the acquisition of infectious disease and improve their health. Although in many countries the legal framework supports young people to provide consent for medical interventions if they are considered competent, written parental consent can act as a barrier to uptake as it is frequently a condition of adolescent vaccination programmes. The aim of this systematic review protocol is to document the methods which will be used to identify, appraise and synthesise the available qualitative and quantitative evidence to address: (1) whether implementation of adolescent self-consent procedures can increase vaccination uptake and (2) the barriers and facilitators to implementation of adolescent self-consent procedures. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Comprehensive search strategy of all relevant electronic databases for both qualitative and quantitative studies using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. At least two authors will independently review titles and abstracts, extract data and assess the methodological quality of eligible primary studies, resolving disagreements by consensus. Quantitative studies will be reported narratively and where possible pooled in a meta-analysis using a random-effects model. The findings of qualitative primary studies will be extracted, interpreted and synthesised to identify overarching themes as well as similarities and differences within those themes. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: As this systematic review involves analysis of secondary data, the study does not require ethical approvals. We will use our findings to assess whether the evidence supports the hypothesis that self-consent procedures can increase coverage of adolescent vaccination programmes. We will identify barriers and facilitators to the implementation of adolescent self-consent for vaccination and make recommendations for policy makers and practitioners in relation to consent procedures within vaccination programmes for young people. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42017084509. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5961593/ /pubmed/29780031 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021335 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Infectious Diseases Fisher, Harriet Hickman, Matthew Macleod, John Audrey, Suzanne Adolescent self-consent for vaccinations: protocol for a mixed methods systematic review |
title | Adolescent self-consent for vaccinations: protocol for a mixed methods systematic review |
title_full | Adolescent self-consent for vaccinations: protocol for a mixed methods systematic review |
title_fullStr | Adolescent self-consent for vaccinations: protocol for a mixed methods systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Adolescent self-consent for vaccinations: protocol for a mixed methods systematic review |
title_short | Adolescent self-consent for vaccinations: protocol for a mixed methods systematic review |
title_sort | adolescent self-consent for vaccinations: protocol for a mixed methods systematic review |
topic | Infectious Diseases |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5961593/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29780031 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021335 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fisherharriet adolescentselfconsentforvaccinationsprotocolforamixedmethodssystematicreview AT hickmanmatthew adolescentselfconsentforvaccinationsprotocolforamixedmethodssystematicreview AT macleodjohn adolescentselfconsentforvaccinationsprotocolforamixedmethodssystematicreview AT audreysuzanne adolescentselfconsentforvaccinationsprotocolforamixedmethodssystematicreview |