Cargando…
Emerging biomarkers in the diagnosis of prostate cancer
Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most common cancer in men worldwide. A large proportion of PCa are latent, never destined to progress or affect the patients’ life. It is of utmost importance to identify which PCa are destined to progress and which would benefit from an early radical treatment. P...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5961643/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29844697 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PGPM.S136026 |
_version_ | 1783324755054559232 |
---|---|
author | Filella, Xavier Fernández-Galan, Esther Fernández Bonifacio, Rosa Foj, Laura |
author_facet | Filella, Xavier Fernández-Galan, Esther Fernández Bonifacio, Rosa Foj, Laura |
author_sort | Filella, Xavier |
collection | PubMed |
description | Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most common cancer in men worldwide. A large proportion of PCa are latent, never destined to progress or affect the patients’ life. It is of utmost importance to identify which PCa are destined to progress and which would benefit from an early radical treatment. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) remains the most used test to detect PCa. Its limited specificity and an elevated rate of overdiagnosis are the main problems associated with PSA testing. New PCa biomarkers have been proposed to improve the accuracy of PSA in the management of early PCa. Commercially available biomarkers such as PCA3 score, Prostate Health Index (PHI), and the four-kallikrein panel are used with the purpose of reducing the number of unnecessary biopsies and providing information related to the aggressiveness of the tumor. The relationship with PCa aggressiveness seems to be confirmed by PHI and the four-kallikrein panel, but not by the PCA3 score. In this review, we also summarize new promising biomarkers, such as PSA glycoforms, TMPRSS2:ERG fusion gene, microRNAs, circulating tumor cells, androgen receptor variants, and PTEN gene. All these emerging biomarkers could change the management of early PCa, offering more accurate results than PSA. Nonetheless, large prospective studies comparing these new biomarkers among them are required to know their real value in PCa detection and prognosis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5961643 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59616432018-05-29 Emerging biomarkers in the diagnosis of prostate cancer Filella, Xavier Fernández-Galan, Esther Fernández Bonifacio, Rosa Foj, Laura Pharmgenomics Pers Med Review Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most common cancer in men worldwide. A large proportion of PCa are latent, never destined to progress or affect the patients’ life. It is of utmost importance to identify which PCa are destined to progress and which would benefit from an early radical treatment. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) remains the most used test to detect PCa. Its limited specificity and an elevated rate of overdiagnosis are the main problems associated with PSA testing. New PCa biomarkers have been proposed to improve the accuracy of PSA in the management of early PCa. Commercially available biomarkers such as PCA3 score, Prostate Health Index (PHI), and the four-kallikrein panel are used with the purpose of reducing the number of unnecessary biopsies and providing information related to the aggressiveness of the tumor. The relationship with PCa aggressiveness seems to be confirmed by PHI and the four-kallikrein panel, but not by the PCA3 score. In this review, we also summarize new promising biomarkers, such as PSA glycoforms, TMPRSS2:ERG fusion gene, microRNAs, circulating tumor cells, androgen receptor variants, and PTEN gene. All these emerging biomarkers could change the management of early PCa, offering more accurate results than PSA. Nonetheless, large prospective studies comparing these new biomarkers among them are required to know their real value in PCa detection and prognosis. Dove Medical Press 2018-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5961643/ /pubmed/29844697 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PGPM.S136026 Text en © 2018 Filella et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Review Filella, Xavier Fernández-Galan, Esther Fernández Bonifacio, Rosa Foj, Laura Emerging biomarkers in the diagnosis of prostate cancer |
title | Emerging biomarkers in the diagnosis of prostate cancer |
title_full | Emerging biomarkers in the diagnosis of prostate cancer |
title_fullStr | Emerging biomarkers in the diagnosis of prostate cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Emerging biomarkers in the diagnosis of prostate cancer |
title_short | Emerging biomarkers in the diagnosis of prostate cancer |
title_sort | emerging biomarkers in the diagnosis of prostate cancer |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5961643/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29844697 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PGPM.S136026 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT filellaxavier emergingbiomarkersinthediagnosisofprostatecancer AT fernandezgalanesther emergingbiomarkersinthediagnosisofprostatecancer AT fernandezbonifaciorosa emergingbiomarkersinthediagnosisofprostatecancer AT fojlaura emergingbiomarkersinthediagnosisofprostatecancer |