Cargando…
Comparison of Different Classifiers with Active Learning to Support Quality Control in Nucleus Segmentation in Pathology Images
Segmentation of nuclei in whole slide tissue images is a common methodology in pathology image analysis. Most segmentation algorithms are sensitive to input algorithm parameters and the characteristics of input images (tissue morphology, staining, etc.). Because there can be large variability in the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Medical Informatics Association
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5961826/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29888078 |
_version_ | 1783324789570535424 |
---|---|
author | Wen, Si Kurc, Tahsin M. Hou, Le Saltz, Joel H. Gupta, Rajarsi R. Batiste, Rebecca Zhao, Tianhao Nguyen, Vu Samaras, Dimitris Zhu, Wei |
author_facet | Wen, Si Kurc, Tahsin M. Hou, Le Saltz, Joel H. Gupta, Rajarsi R. Batiste, Rebecca Zhao, Tianhao Nguyen, Vu Samaras, Dimitris Zhu, Wei |
author_sort | Wen, Si |
collection | PubMed |
description | Segmentation of nuclei in whole slide tissue images is a common methodology in pathology image analysis. Most segmentation algorithms are sensitive to input algorithm parameters and the characteristics of input images (tissue morphology, staining, etc.). Because there can be large variability in the color, texture, and morphology of tissues within and across cancer types (heterogeneity can exist even within a tissue specimen), it is likely that a set of input parameters will not perform well across multiple images. It is, therefore, highly desired, and necessary in some cases, to carry out a quality control of segmentation results. This work investigates the application of machine learning in this process. We report on the application of active learning for segmentation quality assessment for pathology images and compare three classification methods, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF) and Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), for their performance improvement and efficiency. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5961826 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | American Medical Informatics Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59618262018-06-08 Comparison of Different Classifiers with Active Learning to Support Quality Control in Nucleus Segmentation in Pathology Images Wen, Si Kurc, Tahsin M. Hou, Le Saltz, Joel H. Gupta, Rajarsi R. Batiste, Rebecca Zhao, Tianhao Nguyen, Vu Samaras, Dimitris Zhu, Wei AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc Articles Segmentation of nuclei in whole slide tissue images is a common methodology in pathology image analysis. Most segmentation algorithms are sensitive to input algorithm parameters and the characteristics of input images (tissue morphology, staining, etc.). Because there can be large variability in the color, texture, and morphology of tissues within and across cancer types (heterogeneity can exist even within a tissue specimen), it is likely that a set of input parameters will not perform well across multiple images. It is, therefore, highly desired, and necessary in some cases, to carry out a quality control of segmentation results. This work investigates the application of machine learning in this process. We report on the application of active learning for segmentation quality assessment for pathology images and compare three classification methods, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF) and Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), for their performance improvement and efficiency. American Medical Informatics Association 2018-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5961826/ /pubmed/29888078 Text en ©2018 AMIA - All rights reserved. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose |
spellingShingle | Articles Wen, Si Kurc, Tahsin M. Hou, Le Saltz, Joel H. Gupta, Rajarsi R. Batiste, Rebecca Zhao, Tianhao Nguyen, Vu Samaras, Dimitris Zhu, Wei Comparison of Different Classifiers with Active Learning to Support Quality Control in Nucleus Segmentation in Pathology Images |
title | Comparison of Different Classifiers with Active Learning to Support Quality Control in Nucleus Segmentation in Pathology Images |
title_full | Comparison of Different Classifiers with Active Learning to Support Quality Control in Nucleus Segmentation in Pathology Images |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Different Classifiers with Active Learning to Support Quality Control in Nucleus Segmentation in Pathology Images |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Different Classifiers with Active Learning to Support Quality Control in Nucleus Segmentation in Pathology Images |
title_short | Comparison of Different Classifiers with Active Learning to Support Quality Control in Nucleus Segmentation in Pathology Images |
title_sort | comparison of different classifiers with active learning to support quality control in nucleus segmentation in pathology images |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5961826/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29888078 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wensi comparisonofdifferentclassifierswithactivelearningtosupportqualitycontrolinnucleussegmentationinpathologyimages AT kurctahsinm comparisonofdifferentclassifierswithactivelearningtosupportqualitycontrolinnucleussegmentationinpathologyimages AT houle comparisonofdifferentclassifierswithactivelearningtosupportqualitycontrolinnucleussegmentationinpathologyimages AT saltzjoelh comparisonofdifferentclassifierswithactivelearningtosupportqualitycontrolinnucleussegmentationinpathologyimages AT guptarajarsir comparisonofdifferentclassifierswithactivelearningtosupportqualitycontrolinnucleussegmentationinpathologyimages AT batisterebecca comparisonofdifferentclassifierswithactivelearningtosupportqualitycontrolinnucleussegmentationinpathologyimages AT zhaotianhao comparisonofdifferentclassifierswithactivelearningtosupportqualitycontrolinnucleussegmentationinpathologyimages AT nguyenvu comparisonofdifferentclassifierswithactivelearningtosupportqualitycontrolinnucleussegmentationinpathologyimages AT samarasdimitris comparisonofdifferentclassifierswithactivelearningtosupportqualitycontrolinnucleussegmentationinpathologyimages AT zhuwei comparisonofdifferentclassifierswithactivelearningtosupportqualitycontrolinnucleussegmentationinpathologyimages |