Cargando…

Comparison of Different Classifiers with Active Learning to Support Quality Control in Nucleus Segmentation in Pathology Images

Segmentation of nuclei in whole slide tissue images is a common methodology in pathology image analysis. Most segmentation algorithms are sensitive to input algorithm parameters and the characteristics of input images (tissue morphology, staining, etc.). Because there can be large variability in the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wen, Si, Kurc, Tahsin M., Hou, Le, Saltz, Joel H., Gupta, Rajarsi R., Batiste, Rebecca, Zhao, Tianhao, Nguyen, Vu, Samaras, Dimitris, Zhu, Wei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Medical Informatics Association 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5961826/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29888078
_version_ 1783324789570535424
author Wen, Si
Kurc, Tahsin M.
Hou, Le
Saltz, Joel H.
Gupta, Rajarsi R.
Batiste, Rebecca
Zhao, Tianhao
Nguyen, Vu
Samaras, Dimitris
Zhu, Wei
author_facet Wen, Si
Kurc, Tahsin M.
Hou, Le
Saltz, Joel H.
Gupta, Rajarsi R.
Batiste, Rebecca
Zhao, Tianhao
Nguyen, Vu
Samaras, Dimitris
Zhu, Wei
author_sort Wen, Si
collection PubMed
description Segmentation of nuclei in whole slide tissue images is a common methodology in pathology image analysis. Most segmentation algorithms are sensitive to input algorithm parameters and the characteristics of input images (tissue morphology, staining, etc.). Because there can be large variability in the color, texture, and morphology of tissues within and across cancer types (heterogeneity can exist even within a tissue specimen), it is likely that a set of input parameters will not perform well across multiple images. It is, therefore, highly desired, and necessary in some cases, to carry out a quality control of segmentation results. This work investigates the application of machine learning in this process. We report on the application of active learning for segmentation quality assessment for pathology images and compare three classification methods, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF) and Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), for their performance improvement and efficiency.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5961826
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher American Medical Informatics Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59618262018-06-08 Comparison of Different Classifiers with Active Learning to Support Quality Control in Nucleus Segmentation in Pathology Images Wen, Si Kurc, Tahsin M. Hou, Le Saltz, Joel H. Gupta, Rajarsi R. Batiste, Rebecca Zhao, Tianhao Nguyen, Vu Samaras, Dimitris Zhu, Wei AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc Articles Segmentation of nuclei in whole slide tissue images is a common methodology in pathology image analysis. Most segmentation algorithms are sensitive to input algorithm parameters and the characteristics of input images (tissue morphology, staining, etc.). Because there can be large variability in the color, texture, and morphology of tissues within and across cancer types (heterogeneity can exist even within a tissue specimen), it is likely that a set of input parameters will not perform well across multiple images. It is, therefore, highly desired, and necessary in some cases, to carry out a quality control of segmentation results. This work investigates the application of machine learning in this process. We report on the application of active learning for segmentation quality assessment for pathology images and compare three classification methods, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF) and Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), for their performance improvement and efficiency. American Medical Informatics Association 2018-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5961826/ /pubmed/29888078 Text en ©2018 AMIA - All rights reserved. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose
spellingShingle Articles
Wen, Si
Kurc, Tahsin M.
Hou, Le
Saltz, Joel H.
Gupta, Rajarsi R.
Batiste, Rebecca
Zhao, Tianhao
Nguyen, Vu
Samaras, Dimitris
Zhu, Wei
Comparison of Different Classifiers with Active Learning to Support Quality Control in Nucleus Segmentation in Pathology Images
title Comparison of Different Classifiers with Active Learning to Support Quality Control in Nucleus Segmentation in Pathology Images
title_full Comparison of Different Classifiers with Active Learning to Support Quality Control in Nucleus Segmentation in Pathology Images
title_fullStr Comparison of Different Classifiers with Active Learning to Support Quality Control in Nucleus Segmentation in Pathology Images
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Different Classifiers with Active Learning to Support Quality Control in Nucleus Segmentation in Pathology Images
title_short Comparison of Different Classifiers with Active Learning to Support Quality Control in Nucleus Segmentation in Pathology Images
title_sort comparison of different classifiers with active learning to support quality control in nucleus segmentation in pathology images
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5961826/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29888078
work_keys_str_mv AT wensi comparisonofdifferentclassifierswithactivelearningtosupportqualitycontrolinnucleussegmentationinpathologyimages
AT kurctahsinm comparisonofdifferentclassifierswithactivelearningtosupportqualitycontrolinnucleussegmentationinpathologyimages
AT houle comparisonofdifferentclassifierswithactivelearningtosupportqualitycontrolinnucleussegmentationinpathologyimages
AT saltzjoelh comparisonofdifferentclassifierswithactivelearningtosupportqualitycontrolinnucleussegmentationinpathologyimages
AT guptarajarsir comparisonofdifferentclassifierswithactivelearningtosupportqualitycontrolinnucleussegmentationinpathologyimages
AT batisterebecca comparisonofdifferentclassifierswithactivelearningtosupportqualitycontrolinnucleussegmentationinpathologyimages
AT zhaotianhao comparisonofdifferentclassifierswithactivelearningtosupportqualitycontrolinnucleussegmentationinpathologyimages
AT nguyenvu comparisonofdifferentclassifierswithactivelearningtosupportqualitycontrolinnucleussegmentationinpathologyimages
AT samarasdimitris comparisonofdifferentclassifierswithactivelearningtosupportqualitycontrolinnucleussegmentationinpathologyimages
AT zhuwei comparisonofdifferentclassifierswithactivelearningtosupportqualitycontrolinnucleussegmentationinpathologyimages