Cargando…

ICD-10 procedure codes produce transition challenges

The transition of procedure coding from ICD-9-CM-Vol-3 to ICD-10-PCS has generated problems for the medical community at large resulting from the lack of clarity required to integrate two non-congruent coding systems. We hypothesized that quantifying these issues with network topology analyses offer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boyd, Andrew D., Li, Jianrong ‘John’, Kenost, Colleen, Zaim, Samir Rachid, Krive, Jacob, Mittal, Manish, Satava, Richard A., Burton, Michael, Smith, Jacob, Lussier, Yves A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Medical Informatics Association 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5961828/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29888037
_version_ 1783324790029811712
author Boyd, Andrew D.
Li, Jianrong ‘John’
Kenost, Colleen
Zaim, Samir Rachid
Krive, Jacob
Mittal, Manish
Satava, Richard A.
Burton, Michael
Smith, Jacob
Lussier, Yves A.
author_facet Boyd, Andrew D.
Li, Jianrong ‘John’
Kenost, Colleen
Zaim, Samir Rachid
Krive, Jacob
Mittal, Manish
Satava, Richard A.
Burton, Michael
Smith, Jacob
Lussier, Yves A.
author_sort Boyd, Andrew D.
collection PubMed
description The transition of procedure coding from ICD-9-CM-Vol-3 to ICD-10-PCS has generated problems for the medical community at large resulting from the lack of clarity required to integrate two non-congruent coding systems. We hypothesized that quantifying these issues with network topology analyses offers a better understanding of the issues, and therefore we developed solutions (online tools) to empower hospital administrators and researchers to address these challenges. Five topologies were identified: “identity”(I), “class-to-subclass”(C2S), “subclass-toclass”(S2C), “convoluted(C)”, and “no mapping”(NM). The procedure codes in the 2010 Illinois Medicaid dataset (3,290 patients, 116 institutions) were categorized as C=55%, C2S=40%, I=3%, NM=2%, and S2C=1%. Majority of the problematic and ambiguous mappings (convoluted) pertained to operations in ophthalmology cardiology, urology, gyneco-obstetrics, and dermatology. Finally, the algorithms were expanded into a user-friendly tool to identify problematic topologies and specify lists of procedural codes utilized by medical professionals and researchers for mitigating error-prone translations, simplifying research, and improving quality.http://www.lussiergroup.org/transition-to-ICD10PCS
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5961828
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher American Medical Informatics Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59618282018-06-08 ICD-10 procedure codes produce transition challenges Boyd, Andrew D. Li, Jianrong ‘John’ Kenost, Colleen Zaim, Samir Rachid Krive, Jacob Mittal, Manish Satava, Richard A. Burton, Michael Smith, Jacob Lussier, Yves A. AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc Articles The transition of procedure coding from ICD-9-CM-Vol-3 to ICD-10-PCS has generated problems for the medical community at large resulting from the lack of clarity required to integrate two non-congruent coding systems. We hypothesized that quantifying these issues with network topology analyses offers a better understanding of the issues, and therefore we developed solutions (online tools) to empower hospital administrators and researchers to address these challenges. Five topologies were identified: “identity”(I), “class-to-subclass”(C2S), “subclass-toclass”(S2C), “convoluted(C)”, and “no mapping”(NM). The procedure codes in the 2010 Illinois Medicaid dataset (3,290 patients, 116 institutions) were categorized as C=55%, C2S=40%, I=3%, NM=2%, and S2C=1%. Majority of the problematic and ambiguous mappings (convoluted) pertained to operations in ophthalmology cardiology, urology, gyneco-obstetrics, and dermatology. Finally, the algorithms were expanded into a user-friendly tool to identify problematic topologies and specify lists of procedural codes utilized by medical professionals and researchers for mitigating error-prone translations, simplifying research, and improving quality.http://www.lussiergroup.org/transition-to-ICD10PCS American Medical Informatics Association 2018-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5961828/ /pubmed/29888037 Text en ©2018 AMIA - All rights reserved. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose
spellingShingle Articles
Boyd, Andrew D.
Li, Jianrong ‘John’
Kenost, Colleen
Zaim, Samir Rachid
Krive, Jacob
Mittal, Manish
Satava, Richard A.
Burton, Michael
Smith, Jacob
Lussier, Yves A.
ICD-10 procedure codes produce transition challenges
title ICD-10 procedure codes produce transition challenges
title_full ICD-10 procedure codes produce transition challenges
title_fullStr ICD-10 procedure codes produce transition challenges
title_full_unstemmed ICD-10 procedure codes produce transition challenges
title_short ICD-10 procedure codes produce transition challenges
title_sort icd-10 procedure codes produce transition challenges
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5961828/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29888037
work_keys_str_mv AT boydandrewd icd10procedurecodesproducetransitionchallenges
AT lijianrongjohn icd10procedurecodesproducetransitionchallenges
AT kenostcolleen icd10procedurecodesproducetransitionchallenges
AT zaimsamirrachid icd10procedurecodesproducetransitionchallenges
AT krivejacob icd10procedurecodesproducetransitionchallenges
AT mittalmanish icd10procedurecodesproducetransitionchallenges
AT satavaricharda icd10procedurecodesproducetransitionchallenges
AT burtonmichael icd10procedurecodesproducetransitionchallenges
AT smithjacob icd10procedurecodesproducetransitionchallenges
AT lussieryvesa icd10procedurecodesproducetransitionchallenges