Cargando…

Evaluation of miniscrew angulation in the posterior maxilla using cone-beam computed tomographic image

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed at evaluating whether changes in the insertion angle is a determining factor in the positioning of the miniscrews body in a region with larger interradicular space in the posterior maxilla. METHODS: Analysis of 60 posterior maxillary quadrants were made using images obtai...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Villela, Henrique M., Vedovello, Mario, Valdrighi, Heloísa C., Santamaria-Jr, Milton, de Menezes, Carolina Carmo, Vedovello, Silvia A. S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dental Press International 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5962247/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29791691
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.23.1.046-053.oar
_version_ 1783324866158526464
author Villela, Henrique M.
Vedovello, Mario
Valdrighi, Heloísa C.
Santamaria-Jr, Milton
de Menezes, Carolina Carmo
Vedovello, Silvia A. S.
author_facet Villela, Henrique M.
Vedovello, Mario
Valdrighi, Heloísa C.
Santamaria-Jr, Milton
de Menezes, Carolina Carmo
Vedovello, Silvia A. S.
author_sort Villela, Henrique M.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study aimed at evaluating whether changes in the insertion angle is a determining factor in the positioning of the miniscrews body in a region with larger interradicular space in the posterior maxilla. METHODS: Analysis of 60 posterior maxillary quadrants were made using images obtained by means of cone-beam computed tomographic image (CBCT), with 0.076-mm voxel, which presented a real miniscrew inserted in the mesial region of the maxillary first molars, serving as reference point for the placement of the virtual miniscrews. Measurements of the distances between roots were made in three points on the body of the virtual miniscrews (A, B and C), at four different angulations, 70(o), 60(o), 50(o) and 40(o) (T(1) to T(4)), in relation to the long axis of the second premolar. This evaluation was made in four groups, selected in accordance with the disposition of the roots of the second premolars and first molars: Group 1 (all types of roots), Group 2 (convergent roots), Group 3 (divergent roots) and Group 4 (parallel roots). RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in the measurements of points A, B and C, at the different angles (70(o), 60(o), 50(o) and 40(o)) and in the different groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Changes in the insertion angle is not a determinant factor in the positioning of miniscrews body in regions with larger interradicular space in posterior maxilla.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5962247
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Dental Press International
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59622472018-05-24 Evaluation of miniscrew angulation in the posterior maxilla using cone-beam computed tomographic image Villela, Henrique M. Vedovello, Mario Valdrighi, Heloísa C. Santamaria-Jr, Milton de Menezes, Carolina Carmo Vedovello, Silvia A. S. Dental Press J Orthod Original Article OBJECTIVE: This study aimed at evaluating whether changes in the insertion angle is a determining factor in the positioning of the miniscrews body in a region with larger interradicular space in the posterior maxilla. METHODS: Analysis of 60 posterior maxillary quadrants were made using images obtained by means of cone-beam computed tomographic image (CBCT), with 0.076-mm voxel, which presented a real miniscrew inserted in the mesial region of the maxillary first molars, serving as reference point for the placement of the virtual miniscrews. Measurements of the distances between roots were made in three points on the body of the virtual miniscrews (A, B and C), at four different angulations, 70(o), 60(o), 50(o) and 40(o) (T(1) to T(4)), in relation to the long axis of the second premolar. This evaluation was made in four groups, selected in accordance with the disposition of the roots of the second premolars and first molars: Group 1 (all types of roots), Group 2 (convergent roots), Group 3 (divergent roots) and Group 4 (parallel roots). RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in the measurements of points A, B and C, at the different angles (70(o), 60(o), 50(o) and 40(o)) and in the different groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Changes in the insertion angle is not a determinant factor in the positioning of miniscrews body in regions with larger interradicular space in posterior maxilla. Dental Press International 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5962247/ /pubmed/29791691 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.23.1.046-053.oar Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
spellingShingle Original Article
Villela, Henrique M.
Vedovello, Mario
Valdrighi, Heloísa C.
Santamaria-Jr, Milton
de Menezes, Carolina Carmo
Vedovello, Silvia A. S.
Evaluation of miniscrew angulation in the posterior maxilla using cone-beam computed tomographic image
title Evaluation of miniscrew angulation in the posterior maxilla using cone-beam computed tomographic image
title_full Evaluation of miniscrew angulation in the posterior maxilla using cone-beam computed tomographic image
title_fullStr Evaluation of miniscrew angulation in the posterior maxilla using cone-beam computed tomographic image
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of miniscrew angulation in the posterior maxilla using cone-beam computed tomographic image
title_short Evaluation of miniscrew angulation in the posterior maxilla using cone-beam computed tomographic image
title_sort evaluation of miniscrew angulation in the posterior maxilla using cone-beam computed tomographic image
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5962247/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29791691
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.23.1.046-053.oar
work_keys_str_mv AT villelahenriquem evaluationofminiscrewangulationintheposteriormaxillausingconebeamcomputedtomographicimage
AT vedovellomario evaluationofminiscrewangulationintheposteriormaxillausingconebeamcomputedtomographicimage
AT valdrighiheloisac evaluationofminiscrewangulationintheposteriormaxillausingconebeamcomputedtomographicimage
AT santamariajrmilton evaluationofminiscrewangulationintheposteriormaxillausingconebeamcomputedtomographicimage
AT demenezescarolinacarmo evaluationofminiscrewangulationintheposteriormaxillausingconebeamcomputedtomographicimage
AT vedovellosilviaas evaluationofminiscrewangulationintheposteriormaxillausingconebeamcomputedtomographicimage