Cargando…
Evaluation of miniscrew angulation in the posterior maxilla using cone-beam computed tomographic image
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed at evaluating whether changes in the insertion angle is a determining factor in the positioning of the miniscrews body in a region with larger interradicular space in the posterior maxilla. METHODS: Analysis of 60 posterior maxillary quadrants were made using images obtai...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dental Press International
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5962247/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29791691 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.23.1.046-053.oar |
_version_ | 1783324866158526464 |
---|---|
author | Villela, Henrique M. Vedovello, Mario Valdrighi, Heloísa C. Santamaria-Jr, Milton de Menezes, Carolina Carmo Vedovello, Silvia A. S. |
author_facet | Villela, Henrique M. Vedovello, Mario Valdrighi, Heloísa C. Santamaria-Jr, Milton de Menezes, Carolina Carmo Vedovello, Silvia A. S. |
author_sort | Villela, Henrique M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: This study aimed at evaluating whether changes in the insertion angle is a determining factor in the positioning of the miniscrews body in a region with larger interradicular space in the posterior maxilla. METHODS: Analysis of 60 posterior maxillary quadrants were made using images obtained by means of cone-beam computed tomographic image (CBCT), with 0.076-mm voxel, which presented a real miniscrew inserted in the mesial region of the maxillary first molars, serving as reference point for the placement of the virtual miniscrews. Measurements of the distances between roots were made in three points on the body of the virtual miniscrews (A, B and C), at four different angulations, 70(o), 60(o), 50(o) and 40(o) (T(1) to T(4)), in relation to the long axis of the second premolar. This evaluation was made in four groups, selected in accordance with the disposition of the roots of the second premolars and first molars: Group 1 (all types of roots), Group 2 (convergent roots), Group 3 (divergent roots) and Group 4 (parallel roots). RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in the measurements of points A, B and C, at the different angles (70(o), 60(o), 50(o) and 40(o)) and in the different groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Changes in the insertion angle is not a determinant factor in the positioning of miniscrews body in regions with larger interradicular space in posterior maxilla. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5962247 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Dental Press International |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59622472018-05-24 Evaluation of miniscrew angulation in the posterior maxilla using cone-beam computed tomographic image Villela, Henrique M. Vedovello, Mario Valdrighi, Heloísa C. Santamaria-Jr, Milton de Menezes, Carolina Carmo Vedovello, Silvia A. S. Dental Press J Orthod Original Article OBJECTIVE: This study aimed at evaluating whether changes in the insertion angle is a determining factor in the positioning of the miniscrews body in a region with larger interradicular space in the posterior maxilla. METHODS: Analysis of 60 posterior maxillary quadrants were made using images obtained by means of cone-beam computed tomographic image (CBCT), with 0.076-mm voxel, which presented a real miniscrew inserted in the mesial region of the maxillary first molars, serving as reference point for the placement of the virtual miniscrews. Measurements of the distances between roots were made in three points on the body of the virtual miniscrews (A, B and C), at four different angulations, 70(o), 60(o), 50(o) and 40(o) (T(1) to T(4)), in relation to the long axis of the second premolar. This evaluation was made in four groups, selected in accordance with the disposition of the roots of the second premolars and first molars: Group 1 (all types of roots), Group 2 (convergent roots), Group 3 (divergent roots) and Group 4 (parallel roots). RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in the measurements of points A, B and C, at the different angles (70(o), 60(o), 50(o) and 40(o)) and in the different groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Changes in the insertion angle is not a determinant factor in the positioning of miniscrews body in regions with larger interradicular space in posterior maxilla. Dental Press International 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5962247/ /pubmed/29791691 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.23.1.046-053.oar Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License |
spellingShingle | Original Article Villela, Henrique M. Vedovello, Mario Valdrighi, Heloísa C. Santamaria-Jr, Milton de Menezes, Carolina Carmo Vedovello, Silvia A. S. Evaluation of miniscrew angulation in the posterior maxilla using cone-beam computed tomographic image |
title | Evaluation of miniscrew angulation in the posterior maxilla using cone-beam computed tomographic image |
title_full | Evaluation of miniscrew angulation in the posterior maxilla using cone-beam computed tomographic image |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of miniscrew angulation in the posterior maxilla using cone-beam computed tomographic image |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of miniscrew angulation in the posterior maxilla using cone-beam computed tomographic image |
title_short | Evaluation of miniscrew angulation in the posterior maxilla using cone-beam computed tomographic image |
title_sort | evaluation of miniscrew angulation in the posterior maxilla using cone-beam computed tomographic image |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5962247/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29791691 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.23.1.046-053.oar |
work_keys_str_mv | AT villelahenriquem evaluationofminiscrewangulationintheposteriormaxillausingconebeamcomputedtomographicimage AT vedovellomario evaluationofminiscrewangulationintheposteriormaxillausingconebeamcomputedtomographicimage AT valdrighiheloisac evaluationofminiscrewangulationintheposteriormaxillausingconebeamcomputedtomographicimage AT santamariajrmilton evaluationofminiscrewangulationintheposteriormaxillausingconebeamcomputedtomographicimage AT demenezescarolinacarmo evaluationofminiscrewangulationintheposteriormaxillausingconebeamcomputedtomographicimage AT vedovellosilviaas evaluationofminiscrewangulationintheposteriormaxillausingconebeamcomputedtomographicimage |