Cargando…

Factors impacting the efficacy of venlafaxine extended release 75–225 mg/day in patients with major depressive disorder: exploratory post hoc subgroup analyses of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in Japan

PURPOSE: To explore the potential factors impacting the efficacy of venlafaxine extended release (ER) and treatment differences between 75 mg/day and 75–225 mg/day dose in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). METHODS: We performed exploratory post hoc subgroup analyses of a randomized, dou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Watanabe, Yoshinori, Asami, Yuko, Hirano, Yoko, Kuribayashi, Kazuhiko, Itamura, Rio, Imaeda, Takayuki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5962303/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29844674
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S146428
_version_ 1783324871601684480
author Watanabe, Yoshinori
Asami, Yuko
Hirano, Yoko
Kuribayashi, Kazuhiko
Itamura, Rio
Imaeda, Takayuki
author_facet Watanabe, Yoshinori
Asami, Yuko
Hirano, Yoko
Kuribayashi, Kazuhiko
Itamura, Rio
Imaeda, Takayuki
author_sort Watanabe, Yoshinori
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To explore the potential factors impacting the efficacy of venlafaxine extended release (ER) and treatment differences between 75 mg/day and 75–225 mg/day dose in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). METHODS: We performed exploratory post hoc subgroup analyses of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study conducted in Japan. A total of 538 outpatients aged 20 years or older with a primary diagnosis of MDD who experienced single or recurrent episodes were randomized into three groups: fixed-dose, flexible-dose, or placebo. Venlafaxine ER was initiated at 37.5 mg/day and titrated to 75 mg/day for both fixed-dose and flexible-dose group, and to 225 mg/day for flexible-dose group (if well tolerated). Efficacy endpoints were changes from baseline at Week 8 using the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression–17 items (HAM-D(17)) total score, Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression–6 items score, and Montgomery–Asberg Depression Rating Scale total score. The following factors were considered in the subgroup analyses: sex, age, HAM-D(17) total score at baseline, duration of MDD, duration of current depressive episode, history of previous depressive episodes, history of previous medications for MDD, and CYP2D6 phenotype. For each subgroup, an analysis of covariance model was fitted and the adjusted mean of the treatment effect and corresponding 95% CI were computed. Due to the exploratory nature of the investigation, no statistical hypothesis testing was used. RESULTS: Venlafaxine ER improved symptoms of MDD compared with placebo in most subgroups. The subgroup with a long duration of MDD (>22 months) consistently showed greater treatment benefits in the flexible-dose group than in the fixed-dose group. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that a greater treatment response to venlafaxine ER (up to 225 mg/day) can be seen in patients with a longer duration of MDD. Further investigations are needed to identify additional factors impacting the efficacy of venlafaxine ER.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5962303
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59623032018-05-29 Factors impacting the efficacy of venlafaxine extended release 75–225 mg/day in patients with major depressive disorder: exploratory post hoc subgroup analyses of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in Japan Watanabe, Yoshinori Asami, Yuko Hirano, Yoko Kuribayashi, Kazuhiko Itamura, Rio Imaeda, Takayuki Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat Original Research PURPOSE: To explore the potential factors impacting the efficacy of venlafaxine extended release (ER) and treatment differences between 75 mg/day and 75–225 mg/day dose in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). METHODS: We performed exploratory post hoc subgroup analyses of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study conducted in Japan. A total of 538 outpatients aged 20 years or older with a primary diagnosis of MDD who experienced single or recurrent episodes were randomized into three groups: fixed-dose, flexible-dose, or placebo. Venlafaxine ER was initiated at 37.5 mg/day and titrated to 75 mg/day for both fixed-dose and flexible-dose group, and to 225 mg/day for flexible-dose group (if well tolerated). Efficacy endpoints were changes from baseline at Week 8 using the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression–17 items (HAM-D(17)) total score, Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression–6 items score, and Montgomery–Asberg Depression Rating Scale total score. The following factors were considered in the subgroup analyses: sex, age, HAM-D(17) total score at baseline, duration of MDD, duration of current depressive episode, history of previous depressive episodes, history of previous medications for MDD, and CYP2D6 phenotype. For each subgroup, an analysis of covariance model was fitted and the adjusted mean of the treatment effect and corresponding 95% CI were computed. Due to the exploratory nature of the investigation, no statistical hypothesis testing was used. RESULTS: Venlafaxine ER improved symptoms of MDD compared with placebo in most subgroups. The subgroup with a long duration of MDD (>22 months) consistently showed greater treatment benefits in the flexible-dose group than in the fixed-dose group. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that a greater treatment response to venlafaxine ER (up to 225 mg/day) can be seen in patients with a longer duration of MDD. Further investigations are needed to identify additional factors impacting the efficacy of venlafaxine ER. Dove Medical Press 2018-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5962303/ /pubmed/29844674 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S146428 Text en © 2018 Watanabe et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Watanabe, Yoshinori
Asami, Yuko
Hirano, Yoko
Kuribayashi, Kazuhiko
Itamura, Rio
Imaeda, Takayuki
Factors impacting the efficacy of venlafaxine extended release 75–225 mg/day in patients with major depressive disorder: exploratory post hoc subgroup analyses of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in Japan
title Factors impacting the efficacy of venlafaxine extended release 75–225 mg/day in patients with major depressive disorder: exploratory post hoc subgroup analyses of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in Japan
title_full Factors impacting the efficacy of venlafaxine extended release 75–225 mg/day in patients with major depressive disorder: exploratory post hoc subgroup analyses of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in Japan
title_fullStr Factors impacting the efficacy of venlafaxine extended release 75–225 mg/day in patients with major depressive disorder: exploratory post hoc subgroup analyses of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in Japan
title_full_unstemmed Factors impacting the efficacy of venlafaxine extended release 75–225 mg/day in patients with major depressive disorder: exploratory post hoc subgroup analyses of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in Japan
title_short Factors impacting the efficacy of venlafaxine extended release 75–225 mg/day in patients with major depressive disorder: exploratory post hoc subgroup analyses of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in Japan
title_sort factors impacting the efficacy of venlafaxine extended release 75–225 mg/day in patients with major depressive disorder: exploratory post hoc subgroup analyses of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in japan
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5962303/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29844674
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S146428
work_keys_str_mv AT watanabeyoshinori factorsimpactingtheefficacyofvenlafaxineextendedrelease75225mgdayinpatientswithmajordepressivedisorderexploratoryposthocsubgroupanalysesofarandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledstudyinjapan
AT asamiyuko factorsimpactingtheefficacyofvenlafaxineextendedrelease75225mgdayinpatientswithmajordepressivedisorderexploratoryposthocsubgroupanalysesofarandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledstudyinjapan
AT hiranoyoko factorsimpactingtheefficacyofvenlafaxineextendedrelease75225mgdayinpatientswithmajordepressivedisorderexploratoryposthocsubgroupanalysesofarandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledstudyinjapan
AT kuribayashikazuhiko factorsimpactingtheefficacyofvenlafaxineextendedrelease75225mgdayinpatientswithmajordepressivedisorderexploratoryposthocsubgroupanalysesofarandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledstudyinjapan
AT itamurario factorsimpactingtheefficacyofvenlafaxineextendedrelease75225mgdayinpatientswithmajordepressivedisorderexploratoryposthocsubgroupanalysesofarandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledstudyinjapan
AT imaedatakayuki factorsimpactingtheefficacyofvenlafaxineextendedrelease75225mgdayinpatientswithmajordepressivedisorderexploratoryposthocsubgroupanalysesofarandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledstudyinjapan