Cargando…

Exploring factors that might influence primary-care provider discussion of and recommendation for prostate and colon cancer screening

BACKGROUND: Primary-care providers may contribute to the use of low-value cancer screening. OBJECTIVE: We sought to examine circumstances under which primary-care providers would discuss and recommend two types of cancer screening services across a spectrum of net benefit and other factors known to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kistler, Christine E, Vu, Maihan, Sutkowi-Hemstreet, Anne, Gizlice, Ziya, Harris, Russell P, Brewer, Noel T, Lewis, Carmen L, Dolor, Rowena J, Barclay, Colleen, Sheridan, Stacey L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5962312/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29844698
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S153887
_version_ 1783324873750216704
author Kistler, Christine E
Vu, Maihan
Sutkowi-Hemstreet, Anne
Gizlice, Ziya
Harris, Russell P
Brewer, Noel T
Lewis, Carmen L
Dolor, Rowena J
Barclay, Colleen
Sheridan, Stacey L
author_facet Kistler, Christine E
Vu, Maihan
Sutkowi-Hemstreet, Anne
Gizlice, Ziya
Harris, Russell P
Brewer, Noel T
Lewis, Carmen L
Dolor, Rowena J
Barclay, Colleen
Sheridan, Stacey L
author_sort Kistler, Christine E
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Primary-care providers may contribute to the use of low-value cancer screening. OBJECTIVE: We sought to examine circumstances under which primary-care providers would discuss and recommend two types of cancer screening services across a spectrum of net benefit and other factors known to influence screening. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a cross sectional survey of 126 primary-care providers in 24 primary-care clinics in the US. Participants completed surveys with two hypothetical screening scenarios for prostate or colorectal cancer (CRC). Patients in the scenarios varied by age and screening-request status. For each scenario, providers indicated whether they would discuss and recommend screening. Providers also reported on their screening attitudes and the influence of other factors known to affect screening (short patient visits, worry about lawsuits, clinical reminders/performance measures, and screening guidelines). We examined associations between providers’ attitudes and their screening recommendations for hypothetical 90-year-olds (the lowest-value screening). RESULTS: Providers reported they would discuss cancer screening more often than they would recommend it (P<0.001). More providers would discuss and recommend screening for CRC than prostate cancer (P<0.001), for younger than older patients (P<0.001), and when the patient requested it than when not (P<0.001). For a 90-year-old patient, every point increase in cancer-specific screening attitude increased the likelihood of a screening recommendation (30% for prostate cancer and 30% for CRC). DISCUSSION: While most providers’ reported practice patterns aligned with net benefit, some providers would discuss and recommend low-value cancer screening, particularly when faced with a patient request. CONCLUSION: More work appears to be needed to help providers to discuss and recommend screening that aligns with value.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5962312
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59623122018-05-29 Exploring factors that might influence primary-care provider discussion of and recommendation for prostate and colon cancer screening Kistler, Christine E Vu, Maihan Sutkowi-Hemstreet, Anne Gizlice, Ziya Harris, Russell P Brewer, Noel T Lewis, Carmen L Dolor, Rowena J Barclay, Colleen Sheridan, Stacey L Int J Gen Med Original Research BACKGROUND: Primary-care providers may contribute to the use of low-value cancer screening. OBJECTIVE: We sought to examine circumstances under which primary-care providers would discuss and recommend two types of cancer screening services across a spectrum of net benefit and other factors known to influence screening. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a cross sectional survey of 126 primary-care providers in 24 primary-care clinics in the US. Participants completed surveys with two hypothetical screening scenarios for prostate or colorectal cancer (CRC). Patients in the scenarios varied by age and screening-request status. For each scenario, providers indicated whether they would discuss and recommend screening. Providers also reported on their screening attitudes and the influence of other factors known to affect screening (short patient visits, worry about lawsuits, clinical reminders/performance measures, and screening guidelines). We examined associations between providers’ attitudes and their screening recommendations for hypothetical 90-year-olds (the lowest-value screening). RESULTS: Providers reported they would discuss cancer screening more often than they would recommend it (P<0.001). More providers would discuss and recommend screening for CRC than prostate cancer (P<0.001), for younger than older patients (P<0.001), and when the patient requested it than when not (P<0.001). For a 90-year-old patient, every point increase in cancer-specific screening attitude increased the likelihood of a screening recommendation (30% for prostate cancer and 30% for CRC). DISCUSSION: While most providers’ reported practice patterns aligned with net benefit, some providers would discuss and recommend low-value cancer screening, particularly when faced with a patient request. CONCLUSION: More work appears to be needed to help providers to discuss and recommend screening that aligns with value. Dove Medical Press 2018-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5962312/ /pubmed/29844698 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S153887 Text en © 2018 Kistler et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Kistler, Christine E
Vu, Maihan
Sutkowi-Hemstreet, Anne
Gizlice, Ziya
Harris, Russell P
Brewer, Noel T
Lewis, Carmen L
Dolor, Rowena J
Barclay, Colleen
Sheridan, Stacey L
Exploring factors that might influence primary-care provider discussion of and recommendation for prostate and colon cancer screening
title Exploring factors that might influence primary-care provider discussion of and recommendation for prostate and colon cancer screening
title_full Exploring factors that might influence primary-care provider discussion of and recommendation for prostate and colon cancer screening
title_fullStr Exploring factors that might influence primary-care provider discussion of and recommendation for prostate and colon cancer screening
title_full_unstemmed Exploring factors that might influence primary-care provider discussion of and recommendation for prostate and colon cancer screening
title_short Exploring factors that might influence primary-care provider discussion of and recommendation for prostate and colon cancer screening
title_sort exploring factors that might influence primary-care provider discussion of and recommendation for prostate and colon cancer screening
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5962312/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29844698
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S153887
work_keys_str_mv AT kistlerchristinee exploringfactorsthatmightinfluenceprimarycareproviderdiscussionofandrecommendationforprostateandcoloncancerscreening
AT vumaihan exploringfactorsthatmightinfluenceprimarycareproviderdiscussionofandrecommendationforprostateandcoloncancerscreening
AT sutkowihemstreetanne exploringfactorsthatmightinfluenceprimarycareproviderdiscussionofandrecommendationforprostateandcoloncancerscreening
AT gizliceziya exploringfactorsthatmightinfluenceprimarycareproviderdiscussionofandrecommendationforprostateandcoloncancerscreening
AT harrisrussellp exploringfactorsthatmightinfluenceprimarycareproviderdiscussionofandrecommendationforprostateandcoloncancerscreening
AT brewernoelt exploringfactorsthatmightinfluenceprimarycareproviderdiscussionofandrecommendationforprostateandcoloncancerscreening
AT lewiscarmenl exploringfactorsthatmightinfluenceprimarycareproviderdiscussionofandrecommendationforprostateandcoloncancerscreening
AT dolorrowenaj exploringfactorsthatmightinfluenceprimarycareproviderdiscussionofandrecommendationforprostateandcoloncancerscreening
AT barclaycolleen exploringfactorsthatmightinfluenceprimarycareproviderdiscussionofandrecommendationforprostateandcoloncancerscreening
AT sheridanstaceyl exploringfactorsthatmightinfluenceprimarycareproviderdiscussionofandrecommendationforprostateandcoloncancerscreening