Cargando…

Debate: does it matter how you lower blood pressure?

The evidence base for drug treatment of hypertension is strong. Early trials using thiazide diuretics suggested a shortfall in prevention of coronary heart disease. The superiority of newer drugs has been widely advocated but trial evidence does not support an advantage of beta-blockers, angiotensin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: McInnes, Gordon T
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2001
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC59626/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11806774
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cvm-2-2-063
_version_ 1782120088614207488
author McInnes, Gordon T
author_facet McInnes, Gordon T
author_sort McInnes, Gordon T
collection PubMed
description The evidence base for drug treatment of hypertension is strong. Early trials using thiazide diuretics suggested a shortfall in prevention of coronary heart disease. The superiority of newer drugs has been widely advocated but trial evidence does not support an advantage of beta-blockers, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, calcium channel blockers or alpha-blockers for this outcome. Even meta-analyses have failed to clarify matters. If this issue is to be settled, bigger and better trials of longer duration in high-risk patients are needed. Meanwhile, the importance of rigorous blood pressure control using multiple drugs has been established. This should be the focus of our attention rather than agonising over differences in cause-specific outcomes that may not be generalisable to all patient populations.
format Text
id pubmed-59626
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2001
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-596262001-11-06 Debate: does it matter how you lower blood pressure? McInnes, Gordon T Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med Commentary The evidence base for drug treatment of hypertension is strong. Early trials using thiazide diuretics suggested a shortfall in prevention of coronary heart disease. The superiority of newer drugs has been widely advocated but trial evidence does not support an advantage of beta-blockers, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, calcium channel blockers or alpha-blockers for this outcome. Even meta-analyses have failed to clarify matters. If this issue is to be settled, bigger and better trials of longer duration in high-risk patients are needed. Meanwhile, the importance of rigorous blood pressure control using multiple drugs has been established. This should be the focus of our attention rather than agonising over differences in cause-specific outcomes that may not be generalisable to all patient populations. BioMed Central 2001 2001-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC59626/ /pubmed/11806774 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cvm-2-2-063 Text en Copyright © 2001 BioMed Central Ltd
spellingShingle Commentary
McInnes, Gordon T
Debate: does it matter how you lower blood pressure?
title Debate: does it matter how you lower blood pressure?
title_full Debate: does it matter how you lower blood pressure?
title_fullStr Debate: does it matter how you lower blood pressure?
title_full_unstemmed Debate: does it matter how you lower blood pressure?
title_short Debate: does it matter how you lower blood pressure?
title_sort debate: does it matter how you lower blood pressure?
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC59626/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11806774
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cvm-2-2-063
work_keys_str_mv AT mcinnesgordont debatedoesitmatterhowyoulowerbloodpressure