Cargando…
Debate: does it matter how you lower blood pressure?
The evidence base for drug treatment of hypertension is strong. Early trials using thiazide diuretics suggested a shortfall in prevention of coronary heart disease. The superiority of newer drugs has been widely advocated but trial evidence does not support an advantage of beta-blockers, angiotensin...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2001
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC59626/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11806774 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cvm-2-2-063 |
_version_ | 1782120088614207488 |
---|---|
author | McInnes, Gordon T |
author_facet | McInnes, Gordon T |
author_sort | McInnes, Gordon T |
collection | PubMed |
description | The evidence base for drug treatment of hypertension is strong. Early trials using thiazide diuretics suggested a shortfall in prevention of coronary heart disease. The superiority of newer drugs has been widely advocated but trial evidence does not support an advantage of beta-blockers, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, calcium channel blockers or alpha-blockers for this outcome. Even meta-analyses have failed to clarify matters. If this issue is to be settled, bigger and better trials of longer duration in high-risk patients are needed. Meanwhile, the importance of rigorous blood pressure control using multiple drugs has been established. This should be the focus of our attention rather than agonising over differences in cause-specific outcomes that may not be generalisable to all patient populations. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-59626 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2001 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-596262001-11-06 Debate: does it matter how you lower blood pressure? McInnes, Gordon T Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med Commentary The evidence base for drug treatment of hypertension is strong. Early trials using thiazide diuretics suggested a shortfall in prevention of coronary heart disease. The superiority of newer drugs has been widely advocated but trial evidence does not support an advantage of beta-blockers, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, calcium channel blockers or alpha-blockers for this outcome. Even meta-analyses have failed to clarify matters. If this issue is to be settled, bigger and better trials of longer duration in high-risk patients are needed. Meanwhile, the importance of rigorous blood pressure control using multiple drugs has been established. This should be the focus of our attention rather than agonising over differences in cause-specific outcomes that may not be generalisable to all patient populations. BioMed Central 2001 2001-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC59626/ /pubmed/11806774 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cvm-2-2-063 Text en Copyright © 2001 BioMed Central Ltd |
spellingShingle | Commentary McInnes, Gordon T Debate: does it matter how you lower blood pressure? |
title | Debate: does it matter how you lower blood pressure? |
title_full | Debate: does it matter how you lower blood pressure? |
title_fullStr | Debate: does it matter how you lower blood pressure? |
title_full_unstemmed | Debate: does it matter how you lower blood pressure? |
title_short | Debate: does it matter how you lower blood pressure? |
title_sort | debate: does it matter how you lower blood pressure? |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC59626/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11806774 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cvm-2-2-063 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mcinnesgordont debatedoesitmatterhowyoulowerbloodpressure |