Cargando…
Systematic literature review and assessment of patient-reported outcome instruments in sickle cell disease
BACKGROUND: Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a chronic condition associated with high mortality and morbidity. It is characterized by acute clinical symptoms such as painful vaso-occlusive crises, which can impair health-related quality of life (HRQL). This study was conducted to identify validated pati...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5963009/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29784054 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-018-0930-y |
_version_ | 1783324970551607296 |
---|---|
author | Sarri, Grammati Bhor, Menaka Abogunrin, Seye Farmer, Caroline Nandal, Savita Halloway, Rashid Revicki, Dennis A. |
author_facet | Sarri, Grammati Bhor, Menaka Abogunrin, Seye Farmer, Caroline Nandal, Savita Halloway, Rashid Revicki, Dennis A. |
author_sort | Sarri, Grammati |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a chronic condition associated with high mortality and morbidity. It is characterized by acute clinical symptoms such as painful vaso-occlusive crises, which can impair health-related quality of life (HRQL). This study was conducted to identify validated patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments for use in future trials of potential treatments for SCD. METHODS: A systematic literature review (SLR) was performed using MEDLINE and EMBASE to identify United States (US)-based studies published in English between 1997 and 2017 that reported on validated PRO instruments used in randomized controlled trials and real-world settings. The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist was used to assess the quality of PRO instruments. RESULTS: The SLR included 21 studies assessing the psychometric properties of 24 PRO instruments. Fifteen of those instruments were developed and validated for adults and 10 for children (one instrument was used in both children and young adults aged up to 21 years). Only five of the 15 adult instruments and three of the 10 pediatric instruments were developed specifically for SCD. For most instruments, there were few or no data on validation conducted in SCD development cohorts. Of the 24 PRO instruments identified, 16 had strong internal reliability (Cronbach’s α ≥0.80). There was often insufficient information to assess the content validity, construct validity, responsiveness, or test-retest reliability of the instruments identified for both child and adult populations. No validated PRO instruments measuring caregiver burden in SCD were identified. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence on the psychometric properties of PRO instruments was limited. However, the results of this SLR provide key information on such tools to help inform the design of future clinical trials for patients with SCD in the US. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12955-018-0930-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5963009 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59630092018-06-25 Systematic literature review and assessment of patient-reported outcome instruments in sickle cell disease Sarri, Grammati Bhor, Menaka Abogunrin, Seye Farmer, Caroline Nandal, Savita Halloway, Rashid Revicki, Dennis A. Health Qual Life Outcomes Research BACKGROUND: Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a chronic condition associated with high mortality and morbidity. It is characterized by acute clinical symptoms such as painful vaso-occlusive crises, which can impair health-related quality of life (HRQL). This study was conducted to identify validated patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments for use in future trials of potential treatments for SCD. METHODS: A systematic literature review (SLR) was performed using MEDLINE and EMBASE to identify United States (US)-based studies published in English between 1997 and 2017 that reported on validated PRO instruments used in randomized controlled trials and real-world settings. The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist was used to assess the quality of PRO instruments. RESULTS: The SLR included 21 studies assessing the psychometric properties of 24 PRO instruments. Fifteen of those instruments were developed and validated for adults and 10 for children (one instrument was used in both children and young adults aged up to 21 years). Only five of the 15 adult instruments and three of the 10 pediatric instruments were developed specifically for SCD. For most instruments, there were few or no data on validation conducted in SCD development cohorts. Of the 24 PRO instruments identified, 16 had strong internal reliability (Cronbach’s α ≥0.80). There was often insufficient information to assess the content validity, construct validity, responsiveness, or test-retest reliability of the instruments identified for both child and adult populations. No validated PRO instruments measuring caregiver burden in SCD were identified. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence on the psychometric properties of PRO instruments was limited. However, the results of this SLR provide key information on such tools to help inform the design of future clinical trials for patients with SCD in the US. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12955-018-0930-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5963009/ /pubmed/29784054 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-018-0930-y Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Sarri, Grammati Bhor, Menaka Abogunrin, Seye Farmer, Caroline Nandal, Savita Halloway, Rashid Revicki, Dennis A. Systematic literature review and assessment of patient-reported outcome instruments in sickle cell disease |
title | Systematic literature review and assessment of patient-reported outcome instruments in sickle cell disease |
title_full | Systematic literature review and assessment of patient-reported outcome instruments in sickle cell disease |
title_fullStr | Systematic literature review and assessment of patient-reported outcome instruments in sickle cell disease |
title_full_unstemmed | Systematic literature review and assessment of patient-reported outcome instruments in sickle cell disease |
title_short | Systematic literature review and assessment of patient-reported outcome instruments in sickle cell disease |
title_sort | systematic literature review and assessment of patient-reported outcome instruments in sickle cell disease |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5963009/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29784054 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-018-0930-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sarrigrammati systematicliteraturereviewandassessmentofpatientreportedoutcomeinstrumentsinsicklecelldisease AT bhormenaka systematicliteraturereviewandassessmentofpatientreportedoutcomeinstrumentsinsicklecelldisease AT abogunrinseye systematicliteraturereviewandassessmentofpatientreportedoutcomeinstrumentsinsicklecelldisease AT farmercaroline systematicliteraturereviewandassessmentofpatientreportedoutcomeinstrumentsinsicklecelldisease AT nandalsavita systematicliteraturereviewandassessmentofpatientreportedoutcomeinstrumentsinsicklecelldisease AT hallowayrashid systematicliteraturereviewandassessmentofpatientreportedoutcomeinstrumentsinsicklecelldisease AT revickidennisa systematicliteraturereviewandassessmentofpatientreportedoutcomeinstrumentsinsicklecelldisease |