Cargando…

The anatomic determinants of conductive hearing loss secondary to tympanic membrane perforation

OBJECTIVES: Recent studies have introduced middle ear volume (MEV) as a novel determinant of perforation-induced conductive hearing loss (CHL) in a mechanism driven by trans-tympanic membrane pressure differences. The primary aims of this preliminary report are to: 1) correlate CHL with perforation...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carpenter, David J., Tucci, Debara L., Kaylie, David M., Frank-Ito, Dennis O.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Chinese PLA General Hospital 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5963456/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29937847
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joto.2017.06.001
_version_ 1783325039568879616
author Carpenter, David J.
Tucci, Debara L.
Kaylie, David M.
Frank-Ito, Dennis O.
author_facet Carpenter, David J.
Tucci, Debara L.
Kaylie, David M.
Frank-Ito, Dennis O.
author_sort Carpenter, David J.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Recent studies have introduced middle ear volume (MEV) as a novel determinant of perforation-induced conductive hearing loss (CHL) in a mechanism driven by trans-tympanic membrane pressure differences. The primary aims of this preliminary report are to: 1) correlate CHL with perforation size; 2) describe the relationship between CHL and MEV; and 3) compare CHL across a range of cholesteatoma involvement. DESIGN: A retrospective pilot study was performed in 31 subjects with audiometry indicative of conductive hearing loss, temporal bone CT scans, and no prior middle ear surgery. Perforation size and MEV were analyzed with respect to CHL in a cohort of 10 perforated ears with no cholesteatoma. CHLs were compared in 3 groups defined by extent of cholesteatoma involvement. RESULTS: Ears with large and small perforations showed mean ABG values of 32.0 ± 15.7 dB and 16.0 ± 16.4 dB, respectively. A direct relationship was observed between MEV and CHL for ears with large perforations across all frequencies, whereas this relationship for small perforations was frequency-dependent. Finally, a statistically significant increase in CHL was found across ears with increasing cholesteatoma involvement at 1000 Hz (χ(2)(2) = 9.786, p = 0.008), 2000 Hz (χ(2)(2) = 8.455, p = 0.015), and 4000 Hz (χ(2)(2) = 8.253, p = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: These pilot data suggest that greater perforation-induced conductive hearing losses may be associated with larger perforation sizes and cholesteatoma. The correlation between MEV and CHL may require additional study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5963456
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Chinese PLA General Hospital
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59634562018-06-22 The anatomic determinants of conductive hearing loss secondary to tympanic membrane perforation Carpenter, David J. Tucci, Debara L. Kaylie, David M. Frank-Ito, Dennis O. J Otol Research Article OBJECTIVES: Recent studies have introduced middle ear volume (MEV) as a novel determinant of perforation-induced conductive hearing loss (CHL) in a mechanism driven by trans-tympanic membrane pressure differences. The primary aims of this preliminary report are to: 1) correlate CHL with perforation size; 2) describe the relationship between CHL and MEV; and 3) compare CHL across a range of cholesteatoma involvement. DESIGN: A retrospective pilot study was performed in 31 subjects with audiometry indicative of conductive hearing loss, temporal bone CT scans, and no prior middle ear surgery. Perforation size and MEV were analyzed with respect to CHL in a cohort of 10 perforated ears with no cholesteatoma. CHLs were compared in 3 groups defined by extent of cholesteatoma involvement. RESULTS: Ears with large and small perforations showed mean ABG values of 32.0 ± 15.7 dB and 16.0 ± 16.4 dB, respectively. A direct relationship was observed between MEV and CHL for ears with large perforations across all frequencies, whereas this relationship for small perforations was frequency-dependent. Finally, a statistically significant increase in CHL was found across ears with increasing cholesteatoma involvement at 1000 Hz (χ(2)(2) = 9.786, p = 0.008), 2000 Hz (χ(2)(2) = 8.455, p = 0.015), and 4000 Hz (χ(2)(2) = 8.253, p = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: These pilot data suggest that greater perforation-induced conductive hearing losses may be associated with larger perforation sizes and cholesteatoma. The correlation between MEV and CHL may require additional study. Chinese PLA General Hospital 2017-09 2017-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5963456/ /pubmed/29937847 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joto.2017.06.001 Text en © 2017 PLA General Hospital Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery. Production and hosting by Elsevier (Singapore) Pte Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Carpenter, David J.
Tucci, Debara L.
Kaylie, David M.
Frank-Ito, Dennis O.
The anatomic determinants of conductive hearing loss secondary to tympanic membrane perforation
title The anatomic determinants of conductive hearing loss secondary to tympanic membrane perforation
title_full The anatomic determinants of conductive hearing loss secondary to tympanic membrane perforation
title_fullStr The anatomic determinants of conductive hearing loss secondary to tympanic membrane perforation
title_full_unstemmed The anatomic determinants of conductive hearing loss secondary to tympanic membrane perforation
title_short The anatomic determinants of conductive hearing loss secondary to tympanic membrane perforation
title_sort anatomic determinants of conductive hearing loss secondary to tympanic membrane perforation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5963456/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29937847
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joto.2017.06.001
work_keys_str_mv AT carpenterdavidj theanatomicdeterminantsofconductivehearinglosssecondarytotympanicmembraneperforation
AT tuccidebaral theanatomicdeterminantsofconductivehearinglosssecondarytotympanicmembraneperforation
AT kayliedavidm theanatomicdeterminantsofconductivehearinglosssecondarytotympanicmembraneperforation
AT frankitodenniso theanatomicdeterminantsofconductivehearinglosssecondarytotympanicmembraneperforation
AT carpenterdavidj anatomicdeterminantsofconductivehearinglosssecondarytotympanicmembraneperforation
AT tuccidebaral anatomicdeterminantsofconductivehearinglosssecondarytotympanicmembraneperforation
AT kayliedavidm anatomicdeterminantsofconductivehearinglosssecondarytotympanicmembraneperforation
AT frankitodenniso anatomicdeterminantsofconductivehearinglosssecondarytotympanicmembraneperforation