Cargando…

The Distribution of Incomplete Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia (GIM) Subtype among Biopsy Sites according to the Updated Sydney System and Its Association with GIM Extension

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend that extensive gastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM) be considered as a high-risk marker for the development of gastric cancer (GC). But there is emerging evidence that the incomplete GIM subtype is also a high-risk marker. AIMS: To evaluate the performance of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Quach, Duc Trong, Le, Huy Minh, Nguyen, Trung Sao, Hiyama, Toru
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5964434/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29853861
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/4938730
_version_ 1783325178536656896
author Quach, Duc Trong
Le, Huy Minh
Nguyen, Trung Sao
Hiyama, Toru
author_facet Quach, Duc Trong
Le, Huy Minh
Nguyen, Trung Sao
Hiyama, Toru
author_sort Quach, Duc Trong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend that extensive gastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM) be considered as a high-risk marker for the development of gastric cancer (GC). But there is emerging evidence that the incomplete GIM subtype is also a high-risk marker. AIMS: To evaluate the performance of biopsy sites according to the updated Sydney system on detecting the incomplete GIM subtype and to assess its association with GIM extension. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 280 Vietnamese patients with nonulcer dyspepsia. Biopsy specimens were taken from gastric sites according to the updated Sydney system, and sections were routinely stained with Giemsa and hematoxylin and eosin. Biopsy specimens with intestinalization were further evaluated for GIM subtypes with alcian blue 2.5 and periodic acid Schiff stainings. Two experienced pathologists jointly examined all the specimens and reached consensus. RESULTS: The rates of patients with GIM and the incomplete GIM subtype were 81 (28.9%) and 24 (8.4%), respectively. There was no GIM in specimens taken from the greater curvature of corpus. The proportions of the incomplete GIM subtype detected at the incisura angularis, lesser curvature of corpus, lesser curvature of antrum, and greater curvature of antrum were 34.3% (12/35), 34.5% (10/29), 40.5% (17/42), and 31.6 (6/19), respectively, which were not significantly different (p = 0.89). The presence of an incomplete GIM subtype was associated with multifocal GIM (i.e., ≥3 out of 5 biopsy sites with GIM) (OR = 4.02, CI 95%, 1.33–12.16, p = 0.022) and extensive GIM (i.e., GIM in specimens from both of corpus and antrum) (OR = 2.89, CI 95% 1.04–8.02, p = 0.045). CONCLUSIONS: The proportions of an incomplete GIM subtype were not significantly different among gastric biopsy sites with intestinalization. The association between an incomplete GIM subtype and GIM extension, therefore, may be due to an sum accumulation effect.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5964434
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59644342018-05-31 The Distribution of Incomplete Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia (GIM) Subtype among Biopsy Sites according to the Updated Sydney System and Its Association with GIM Extension Quach, Duc Trong Le, Huy Minh Nguyen, Trung Sao Hiyama, Toru Gastroenterol Res Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend that extensive gastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM) be considered as a high-risk marker for the development of gastric cancer (GC). But there is emerging evidence that the incomplete GIM subtype is also a high-risk marker. AIMS: To evaluate the performance of biopsy sites according to the updated Sydney system on detecting the incomplete GIM subtype and to assess its association with GIM extension. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 280 Vietnamese patients with nonulcer dyspepsia. Biopsy specimens were taken from gastric sites according to the updated Sydney system, and sections were routinely stained with Giemsa and hematoxylin and eosin. Biopsy specimens with intestinalization were further evaluated for GIM subtypes with alcian blue 2.5 and periodic acid Schiff stainings. Two experienced pathologists jointly examined all the specimens and reached consensus. RESULTS: The rates of patients with GIM and the incomplete GIM subtype were 81 (28.9%) and 24 (8.4%), respectively. There was no GIM in specimens taken from the greater curvature of corpus. The proportions of the incomplete GIM subtype detected at the incisura angularis, lesser curvature of corpus, lesser curvature of antrum, and greater curvature of antrum were 34.3% (12/35), 34.5% (10/29), 40.5% (17/42), and 31.6 (6/19), respectively, which were not significantly different (p = 0.89). The presence of an incomplete GIM subtype was associated with multifocal GIM (i.e., ≥3 out of 5 biopsy sites with GIM) (OR = 4.02, CI 95%, 1.33–12.16, p = 0.022) and extensive GIM (i.e., GIM in specimens from both of corpus and antrum) (OR = 2.89, CI 95% 1.04–8.02, p = 0.045). CONCLUSIONS: The proportions of an incomplete GIM subtype were not significantly different among gastric biopsy sites with intestinalization. The association between an incomplete GIM subtype and GIM extension, therefore, may be due to an sum accumulation effect. Hindawi 2018-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5964434/ /pubmed/29853861 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/4938730 Text en Copyright © 2018 Duc Trong Quach et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Quach, Duc Trong
Le, Huy Minh
Nguyen, Trung Sao
Hiyama, Toru
The Distribution of Incomplete Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia (GIM) Subtype among Biopsy Sites according to the Updated Sydney System and Its Association with GIM Extension
title The Distribution of Incomplete Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia (GIM) Subtype among Biopsy Sites according to the Updated Sydney System and Its Association with GIM Extension
title_full The Distribution of Incomplete Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia (GIM) Subtype among Biopsy Sites according to the Updated Sydney System and Its Association with GIM Extension
title_fullStr The Distribution of Incomplete Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia (GIM) Subtype among Biopsy Sites according to the Updated Sydney System and Its Association with GIM Extension
title_full_unstemmed The Distribution of Incomplete Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia (GIM) Subtype among Biopsy Sites according to the Updated Sydney System and Its Association with GIM Extension
title_short The Distribution of Incomplete Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia (GIM) Subtype among Biopsy Sites according to the Updated Sydney System and Its Association with GIM Extension
title_sort distribution of incomplete gastric intestinal metaplasia (gim) subtype among biopsy sites according to the updated sydney system and its association with gim extension
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5964434/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29853861
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/4938730
work_keys_str_mv AT quachductrong thedistributionofincompletegastricintestinalmetaplasiagimsubtypeamongbiopsysitesaccordingtotheupdatedsydneysystemanditsassociationwithgimextension
AT lehuyminh thedistributionofincompletegastricintestinalmetaplasiagimsubtypeamongbiopsysitesaccordingtotheupdatedsydneysystemanditsassociationwithgimextension
AT nguyentrungsao thedistributionofincompletegastricintestinalmetaplasiagimsubtypeamongbiopsysitesaccordingtotheupdatedsydneysystemanditsassociationwithgimextension
AT hiyamatoru thedistributionofincompletegastricintestinalmetaplasiagimsubtypeamongbiopsysitesaccordingtotheupdatedsydneysystemanditsassociationwithgimextension
AT quachductrong distributionofincompletegastricintestinalmetaplasiagimsubtypeamongbiopsysitesaccordingtotheupdatedsydneysystemanditsassociationwithgimextension
AT lehuyminh distributionofincompletegastricintestinalmetaplasiagimsubtypeamongbiopsysitesaccordingtotheupdatedsydneysystemanditsassociationwithgimextension
AT nguyentrungsao distributionofincompletegastricintestinalmetaplasiagimsubtypeamongbiopsysitesaccordingtotheupdatedsydneysystemanditsassociationwithgimextension
AT hiyamatoru distributionofincompletegastricintestinalmetaplasiagimsubtypeamongbiopsysitesaccordingtotheupdatedsydneysystemanditsassociationwithgimextension