Cargando…

Shared genetic influences do not explain the association between parent–offspring relationship quality and offspring internalizing problems: results from a Children-of-Twins study

BACKGROUND: Associations between parenting and child outcomes are often interpreted as reflecting causal, social influences. However, such associations may be confounded by genes common to children and their biological parents. To the extent that these shared genes influence behaviours in both gener...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hannigan, L. J., Rijsdijk, F. V., Ganiban, J. M., Reiss, D., Spotts, E. L., Neiderhiser, J. M., Lichtenstein, P., McAdams, T. A., Eley, T. C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5964471/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28745264
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0033291717001908
_version_ 1783325186251030528
author Hannigan, L. J.
Rijsdijk, F. V.
Ganiban, J. M.
Reiss, D.
Spotts, E. L.
Neiderhiser, J. M.
Lichtenstein, P.
McAdams, T. A.
Eley, T. C.
author_facet Hannigan, L. J.
Rijsdijk, F. V.
Ganiban, J. M.
Reiss, D.
Spotts, E. L.
Neiderhiser, J. M.
Lichtenstein, P.
McAdams, T. A.
Eley, T. C.
author_sort Hannigan, L. J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Associations between parenting and child outcomes are often interpreted as reflecting causal, social influences. However, such associations may be confounded by genes common to children and their biological parents. To the extent that these shared genes influence behaviours in both generations, a passive genetic mechanism may explain links between them. Here we aim to quantify the relative importance of passive genetic v. social mechanisms in the intergenerational association between parent–offspring relationship quality and offspring internalizing problems in adolescence. METHODS: We used a Children-of-Twins (CoT) design with data from the parent-based Twin and Offspring Study of Sweden (TOSS) sample [909 adult twin pairs and their offspring; offspring mean age 15.75 (2.42) years], and the child-based Swedish Twin Study of CHild and Adolescent Development (TCHAD) sample [1120 adolescent twin pairs; mean age 13.67 (0.47) years]. A composite of parent-report measures (closeness, conflict, disagreements, expressions of affection) indexed parent–offspring relationship quality in TOSS, and offspring self-reported internalizing symptoms were assessed using the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) in both samples. RESULTS: A social transmission mechanism explained the intergenerational association [r = 0.21 (0.16–0.25)] in our best-fitting model. A passive genetic transmission pathway was not found to be significant, indicating that parental genetic influences on parent–offspring relationship quality and offspring genetic influences on their internalizing problems were non-overlapping. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that this intergenerational association is a product of social interactions between children and parents, within which bidirectional effects are highly plausible. Results from genetically informative studies of parenting-related effects should be used to help refine early parenting interventions aimed at reducing risk for psychopathology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5964471
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59644712018-05-25 Shared genetic influences do not explain the association between parent–offspring relationship quality and offspring internalizing problems: results from a Children-of-Twins study Hannigan, L. J. Rijsdijk, F. V. Ganiban, J. M. Reiss, D. Spotts, E. L. Neiderhiser, J. M. Lichtenstein, P. McAdams, T. A. Eley, T. C. Psychol Med Original Articles BACKGROUND: Associations between parenting and child outcomes are often interpreted as reflecting causal, social influences. However, such associations may be confounded by genes common to children and their biological parents. To the extent that these shared genes influence behaviours in both generations, a passive genetic mechanism may explain links between them. Here we aim to quantify the relative importance of passive genetic v. social mechanisms in the intergenerational association between parent–offspring relationship quality and offspring internalizing problems in adolescence. METHODS: We used a Children-of-Twins (CoT) design with data from the parent-based Twin and Offspring Study of Sweden (TOSS) sample [909 adult twin pairs and their offspring; offspring mean age 15.75 (2.42) years], and the child-based Swedish Twin Study of CHild and Adolescent Development (TCHAD) sample [1120 adolescent twin pairs; mean age 13.67 (0.47) years]. A composite of parent-report measures (closeness, conflict, disagreements, expressions of affection) indexed parent–offspring relationship quality in TOSS, and offspring self-reported internalizing symptoms were assessed using the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) in both samples. RESULTS: A social transmission mechanism explained the intergenerational association [r = 0.21 (0.16–0.25)] in our best-fitting model. A passive genetic transmission pathway was not found to be significant, indicating that parental genetic influences on parent–offspring relationship quality and offspring genetic influences on their internalizing problems were non-overlapping. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that this intergenerational association is a product of social interactions between children and parents, within which bidirectional effects are highly plausible. Results from genetically informative studies of parenting-related effects should be used to help refine early parenting interventions aimed at reducing risk for psychopathology. Cambridge University Press 2018-03 2017-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5964471/ /pubmed/28745264 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0033291717001908 Text en © Cambridge University Press 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Hannigan, L. J.
Rijsdijk, F. V.
Ganiban, J. M.
Reiss, D.
Spotts, E. L.
Neiderhiser, J. M.
Lichtenstein, P.
McAdams, T. A.
Eley, T. C.
Shared genetic influences do not explain the association between parent–offspring relationship quality and offspring internalizing problems: results from a Children-of-Twins study
title Shared genetic influences do not explain the association between parent–offspring relationship quality and offspring internalizing problems: results from a Children-of-Twins study
title_full Shared genetic influences do not explain the association between parent–offspring relationship quality and offspring internalizing problems: results from a Children-of-Twins study
title_fullStr Shared genetic influences do not explain the association between parent–offspring relationship quality and offspring internalizing problems: results from a Children-of-Twins study
title_full_unstemmed Shared genetic influences do not explain the association between parent–offspring relationship quality and offspring internalizing problems: results from a Children-of-Twins study
title_short Shared genetic influences do not explain the association between parent–offspring relationship quality and offspring internalizing problems: results from a Children-of-Twins study
title_sort shared genetic influences do not explain the association between parent–offspring relationship quality and offspring internalizing problems: results from a children-of-twins study
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5964471/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28745264
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0033291717001908
work_keys_str_mv AT hanniganlj sharedgeneticinfluencesdonotexplaintheassociationbetweenparentoffspringrelationshipqualityandoffspringinternalizingproblemsresultsfromachildrenoftwinsstudy
AT rijsdijkfv sharedgeneticinfluencesdonotexplaintheassociationbetweenparentoffspringrelationshipqualityandoffspringinternalizingproblemsresultsfromachildrenoftwinsstudy
AT ganibanjm sharedgeneticinfluencesdonotexplaintheassociationbetweenparentoffspringrelationshipqualityandoffspringinternalizingproblemsresultsfromachildrenoftwinsstudy
AT reissd sharedgeneticinfluencesdonotexplaintheassociationbetweenparentoffspringrelationshipqualityandoffspringinternalizingproblemsresultsfromachildrenoftwinsstudy
AT spottsel sharedgeneticinfluencesdonotexplaintheassociationbetweenparentoffspringrelationshipqualityandoffspringinternalizingproblemsresultsfromachildrenoftwinsstudy
AT neiderhiserjm sharedgeneticinfluencesdonotexplaintheassociationbetweenparentoffspringrelationshipqualityandoffspringinternalizingproblemsresultsfromachildrenoftwinsstudy
AT lichtensteinp sharedgeneticinfluencesdonotexplaintheassociationbetweenparentoffspringrelationshipqualityandoffspringinternalizingproblemsresultsfromachildrenoftwinsstudy
AT mcadamsta sharedgeneticinfluencesdonotexplaintheassociationbetweenparentoffspringrelationshipqualityandoffspringinternalizingproblemsresultsfromachildrenoftwinsstudy
AT eleytc sharedgeneticinfluencesdonotexplaintheassociationbetweenparentoffspringrelationshipqualityandoffspringinternalizingproblemsresultsfromachildrenoftwinsstudy