Cargando…

Hysterectomy with Bilateral Salpingo-Oophorectomy in Female-to-Male Gender Affirmation Surgery: Comparison of Two Methods

INTRODUCTION: The optimal route for hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in female-to-male gender affirmation surgery is still under debate, due to the quite limited and inconsistent published data. The aim of this study is to present and compare the results of vaginal and laparoscopic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jeftovic, M., Stojanovic, B., Bizic, M., Stanojevic, D., Kisic, J., Bencic, M., Djordjevic, M. L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5964534/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29854744
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/3472471
_version_ 1783325195262492672
author Jeftovic, M.
Stojanovic, B.
Bizic, M.
Stanojevic, D.
Kisic, J.
Bencic, M.
Djordjevic, M. L.
author_facet Jeftovic, M.
Stojanovic, B.
Bizic, M.
Stanojevic, D.
Kisic, J.
Bencic, M.
Djordjevic, M. L.
author_sort Jeftovic, M.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The optimal route for hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in female-to-male gender affirmation surgery is still under debate, due to the quite limited and inconsistent published data. The aim of this study is to present and compare the results of vaginal and laparoscopic hysterectomy as part of gender affirmation surgery in female-to-male transsexuals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2012 and 2017, 124 female-to-male transsexuals, aged 18–43 years (mean age: 28.5), underwent hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, followed by colpocleisis and gender affirmation surgery. Transvaginal and laparoscopic hysterectomy were performed in 92 and 32 patients, respectively. Standard outcome measures (types and rates of complications, operative time, blood loss, and postoperative hospital stay) were used to compare the two groups of patients. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 41 months (ranged from 6 to 65 months). The duration of transvaginal approach was significantly shorter (51 minutes compared to 76 minutes, p < 0.001). The total complication rates (less than 3%), reoperation rates (0%), blood loss, and postoperative hospital stays (4.3 days compared to 4.5 days) showed no statistical difference. CONCLUSIONS: Both approaches are safe, with minimal complications. However, we prefer transvaginal hysterectomy due to its shorter operative time, cost-effectiveness, and simpler continuation with one-stage female-to-male gender affirmation surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5964534
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59645342018-05-31 Hysterectomy with Bilateral Salpingo-Oophorectomy in Female-to-Male Gender Affirmation Surgery: Comparison of Two Methods Jeftovic, M. Stojanovic, B. Bizic, M. Stanojevic, D. Kisic, J. Bencic, M. Djordjevic, M. L. Biomed Res Int Research Article INTRODUCTION: The optimal route for hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in female-to-male gender affirmation surgery is still under debate, due to the quite limited and inconsistent published data. The aim of this study is to present and compare the results of vaginal and laparoscopic hysterectomy as part of gender affirmation surgery in female-to-male transsexuals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2012 and 2017, 124 female-to-male transsexuals, aged 18–43 years (mean age: 28.5), underwent hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, followed by colpocleisis and gender affirmation surgery. Transvaginal and laparoscopic hysterectomy were performed in 92 and 32 patients, respectively. Standard outcome measures (types and rates of complications, operative time, blood loss, and postoperative hospital stay) were used to compare the two groups of patients. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 41 months (ranged from 6 to 65 months). The duration of transvaginal approach was significantly shorter (51 minutes compared to 76 minutes, p < 0.001). The total complication rates (less than 3%), reoperation rates (0%), blood loss, and postoperative hospital stays (4.3 days compared to 4.5 days) showed no statistical difference. CONCLUSIONS: Both approaches are safe, with minimal complications. However, we prefer transvaginal hysterectomy due to its shorter operative time, cost-effectiveness, and simpler continuation with one-stage female-to-male gender affirmation surgery. Hindawi 2018-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5964534/ /pubmed/29854744 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/3472471 Text en Copyright © 2018 M. Jeftovic et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Jeftovic, M.
Stojanovic, B.
Bizic, M.
Stanojevic, D.
Kisic, J.
Bencic, M.
Djordjevic, M. L.
Hysterectomy with Bilateral Salpingo-Oophorectomy in Female-to-Male Gender Affirmation Surgery: Comparison of Two Methods
title Hysterectomy with Bilateral Salpingo-Oophorectomy in Female-to-Male Gender Affirmation Surgery: Comparison of Two Methods
title_full Hysterectomy with Bilateral Salpingo-Oophorectomy in Female-to-Male Gender Affirmation Surgery: Comparison of Two Methods
title_fullStr Hysterectomy with Bilateral Salpingo-Oophorectomy in Female-to-Male Gender Affirmation Surgery: Comparison of Two Methods
title_full_unstemmed Hysterectomy with Bilateral Salpingo-Oophorectomy in Female-to-Male Gender Affirmation Surgery: Comparison of Two Methods
title_short Hysterectomy with Bilateral Salpingo-Oophorectomy in Female-to-Male Gender Affirmation Surgery: Comparison of Two Methods
title_sort hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in female-to-male gender affirmation surgery: comparison of two methods
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5964534/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29854744
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/3472471
work_keys_str_mv AT jeftovicm hysterectomywithbilateralsalpingooophorectomyinfemaletomalegenderaffirmationsurgerycomparisonoftwomethods
AT stojanovicb hysterectomywithbilateralsalpingooophorectomyinfemaletomalegenderaffirmationsurgerycomparisonoftwomethods
AT bizicm hysterectomywithbilateralsalpingooophorectomyinfemaletomalegenderaffirmationsurgerycomparisonoftwomethods
AT stanojevicd hysterectomywithbilateralsalpingooophorectomyinfemaletomalegenderaffirmationsurgerycomparisonoftwomethods
AT kisicj hysterectomywithbilateralsalpingooophorectomyinfemaletomalegenderaffirmationsurgerycomparisonoftwomethods
AT bencicm hysterectomywithbilateralsalpingooophorectomyinfemaletomalegenderaffirmationsurgerycomparisonoftwomethods
AT djordjevicml hysterectomywithbilateralsalpingooophorectomyinfemaletomalegenderaffirmationsurgerycomparisonoftwomethods