Cargando…
Hysterectomy with Bilateral Salpingo-Oophorectomy in Female-to-Male Gender Affirmation Surgery: Comparison of Two Methods
INTRODUCTION: The optimal route for hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in female-to-male gender affirmation surgery is still under debate, due to the quite limited and inconsistent published data. The aim of this study is to present and compare the results of vaginal and laparoscopic...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5964534/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29854744 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/3472471 |
_version_ | 1783325195262492672 |
---|---|
author | Jeftovic, M. Stojanovic, B. Bizic, M. Stanojevic, D. Kisic, J. Bencic, M. Djordjevic, M. L. |
author_facet | Jeftovic, M. Stojanovic, B. Bizic, M. Stanojevic, D. Kisic, J. Bencic, M. Djordjevic, M. L. |
author_sort | Jeftovic, M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The optimal route for hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in female-to-male gender affirmation surgery is still under debate, due to the quite limited and inconsistent published data. The aim of this study is to present and compare the results of vaginal and laparoscopic hysterectomy as part of gender affirmation surgery in female-to-male transsexuals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2012 and 2017, 124 female-to-male transsexuals, aged 18–43 years (mean age: 28.5), underwent hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, followed by colpocleisis and gender affirmation surgery. Transvaginal and laparoscopic hysterectomy were performed in 92 and 32 patients, respectively. Standard outcome measures (types and rates of complications, operative time, blood loss, and postoperative hospital stay) were used to compare the two groups of patients. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 41 months (ranged from 6 to 65 months). The duration of transvaginal approach was significantly shorter (51 minutes compared to 76 minutes, p < 0.001). The total complication rates (less than 3%), reoperation rates (0%), blood loss, and postoperative hospital stays (4.3 days compared to 4.5 days) showed no statistical difference. CONCLUSIONS: Both approaches are safe, with minimal complications. However, we prefer transvaginal hysterectomy due to its shorter operative time, cost-effectiveness, and simpler continuation with one-stage female-to-male gender affirmation surgery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5964534 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59645342018-05-31 Hysterectomy with Bilateral Salpingo-Oophorectomy in Female-to-Male Gender Affirmation Surgery: Comparison of Two Methods Jeftovic, M. Stojanovic, B. Bizic, M. Stanojevic, D. Kisic, J. Bencic, M. Djordjevic, M. L. Biomed Res Int Research Article INTRODUCTION: The optimal route for hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in female-to-male gender affirmation surgery is still under debate, due to the quite limited and inconsistent published data. The aim of this study is to present and compare the results of vaginal and laparoscopic hysterectomy as part of gender affirmation surgery in female-to-male transsexuals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2012 and 2017, 124 female-to-male transsexuals, aged 18–43 years (mean age: 28.5), underwent hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, followed by colpocleisis and gender affirmation surgery. Transvaginal and laparoscopic hysterectomy were performed in 92 and 32 patients, respectively. Standard outcome measures (types and rates of complications, operative time, blood loss, and postoperative hospital stay) were used to compare the two groups of patients. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 41 months (ranged from 6 to 65 months). The duration of transvaginal approach was significantly shorter (51 minutes compared to 76 minutes, p < 0.001). The total complication rates (less than 3%), reoperation rates (0%), blood loss, and postoperative hospital stays (4.3 days compared to 4.5 days) showed no statistical difference. CONCLUSIONS: Both approaches are safe, with minimal complications. However, we prefer transvaginal hysterectomy due to its shorter operative time, cost-effectiveness, and simpler continuation with one-stage female-to-male gender affirmation surgery. Hindawi 2018-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5964534/ /pubmed/29854744 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/3472471 Text en Copyright © 2018 M. Jeftovic et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Jeftovic, M. Stojanovic, B. Bizic, M. Stanojevic, D. Kisic, J. Bencic, M. Djordjevic, M. L. Hysterectomy with Bilateral Salpingo-Oophorectomy in Female-to-Male Gender Affirmation Surgery: Comparison of Two Methods |
title | Hysterectomy with Bilateral Salpingo-Oophorectomy in Female-to-Male Gender Affirmation Surgery: Comparison of Two Methods |
title_full | Hysterectomy with Bilateral Salpingo-Oophorectomy in Female-to-Male Gender Affirmation Surgery: Comparison of Two Methods |
title_fullStr | Hysterectomy with Bilateral Salpingo-Oophorectomy in Female-to-Male Gender Affirmation Surgery: Comparison of Two Methods |
title_full_unstemmed | Hysterectomy with Bilateral Salpingo-Oophorectomy in Female-to-Male Gender Affirmation Surgery: Comparison of Two Methods |
title_short | Hysterectomy with Bilateral Salpingo-Oophorectomy in Female-to-Male Gender Affirmation Surgery: Comparison of Two Methods |
title_sort | hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in female-to-male gender affirmation surgery: comparison of two methods |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5964534/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29854744 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/3472471 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jeftovicm hysterectomywithbilateralsalpingooophorectomyinfemaletomalegenderaffirmationsurgerycomparisonoftwomethods AT stojanovicb hysterectomywithbilateralsalpingooophorectomyinfemaletomalegenderaffirmationsurgerycomparisonoftwomethods AT bizicm hysterectomywithbilateralsalpingooophorectomyinfemaletomalegenderaffirmationsurgerycomparisonoftwomethods AT stanojevicd hysterectomywithbilateralsalpingooophorectomyinfemaletomalegenderaffirmationsurgerycomparisonoftwomethods AT kisicj hysterectomywithbilateralsalpingooophorectomyinfemaletomalegenderaffirmationsurgerycomparisonoftwomethods AT bencicm hysterectomywithbilateralsalpingooophorectomyinfemaletomalegenderaffirmationsurgerycomparisonoftwomethods AT djordjevicml hysterectomywithbilateralsalpingooophorectomyinfemaletomalegenderaffirmationsurgerycomparisonoftwomethods |