Cargando…

Are we really “eating well with Canada’s food guide”?

BACKGROUND: Canada’s Food Guide (CFG) has been an important health promotion tool for over seventy years. The most recent version was released in 2007. This study examined Canadians’ exposure to, knowledge, and use of CFG. METHODS: Data came from the Canadian Community Health Survey’s Rapid Response...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Slater, Joyce J., Mudryj, Adriana N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5964897/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29788941
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5540-4
_version_ 1783325264471654400
author Slater, Joyce J.
Mudryj, Adriana N.
author_facet Slater, Joyce J.
Mudryj, Adriana N.
author_sort Slater, Joyce J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Canada’s Food Guide (CFG) has been an important health promotion tool for over seventy years. The most recent version was released in 2007. This study examined Canadians’ exposure to, knowledge, and use of CFG. METHODS: Data came from the Canadian Community Health Survey’s Rapid Response on the Awareness and Usage of Canada’s Food Guide, which included 10,098 Canadians ≥12 y in all ten provinces. Questions were asked on familiarity, awareness and usage of CFG and Canada’s Food Guide for First Nations, Inuit and Métis, as well as healthy eating principles and behaviours. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were used to observe counts and differences among key demographic variables. RESULTS: More than 80% of Canadians have heard of CFG however significantly more women than men were aware of the Guide. Most knew that ‘Vegetables and Fruit’ had the most recommended servings and that dark green vegetables should be consumed daily; however fewer than half knew this of orange vegetables. Just under one third had a copy in their homes, and the most common sources for obtaining CFG were child’s school and health professional/trainer. Those who consulted CFG recently were more likely to consume the recommended servings of vegetables and fruits, and to state that their eating habits were ‘much better’ than one year previously. CONCLUSIONS: CFG has “brand recognition” among Canadians however there are gaps between awareness and eating behaviours. The new Food Guide could consider additional dissemination tools including social media, videos and workbooks tailored to various age groups, demographic groups and settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5964897
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59648972018-05-24 Are we really “eating well with Canada’s food guide”? Slater, Joyce J. Mudryj, Adriana N. BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Canada’s Food Guide (CFG) has been an important health promotion tool for over seventy years. The most recent version was released in 2007. This study examined Canadians’ exposure to, knowledge, and use of CFG. METHODS: Data came from the Canadian Community Health Survey’s Rapid Response on the Awareness and Usage of Canada’s Food Guide, which included 10,098 Canadians ≥12 y in all ten provinces. Questions were asked on familiarity, awareness and usage of CFG and Canada’s Food Guide for First Nations, Inuit and Métis, as well as healthy eating principles and behaviours. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were used to observe counts and differences among key demographic variables. RESULTS: More than 80% of Canadians have heard of CFG however significantly more women than men were aware of the Guide. Most knew that ‘Vegetables and Fruit’ had the most recommended servings and that dark green vegetables should be consumed daily; however fewer than half knew this of orange vegetables. Just under one third had a copy in their homes, and the most common sources for obtaining CFG were child’s school and health professional/trainer. Those who consulted CFG recently were more likely to consume the recommended servings of vegetables and fruits, and to state that their eating habits were ‘much better’ than one year previously. CONCLUSIONS: CFG has “brand recognition” among Canadians however there are gaps between awareness and eating behaviours. The new Food Guide could consider additional dissemination tools including social media, videos and workbooks tailored to various age groups, demographic groups and settings. BioMed Central 2018-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5964897/ /pubmed/29788941 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5540-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Slater, Joyce J.
Mudryj, Adriana N.
Are we really “eating well with Canada’s food guide”?
title Are we really “eating well with Canada’s food guide”?
title_full Are we really “eating well with Canada’s food guide”?
title_fullStr Are we really “eating well with Canada’s food guide”?
title_full_unstemmed Are we really “eating well with Canada’s food guide”?
title_short Are we really “eating well with Canada’s food guide”?
title_sort are we really “eating well with canada’s food guide”?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5964897/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29788941
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5540-4
work_keys_str_mv AT slaterjoycej arewereallyeatingwellwithcanadasfoodguide
AT mudryjadrianan arewereallyeatingwellwithcanadasfoodguide