Cargando…

Leveraging routine clinical materials and mobile technology to assess CBT fidelity: the Innovative Methods to Assess Psychotherapy Practices (imAPP) study

BACKGROUND: Identifying scalable strategies for assessing fidelity is a key challenge in implementation science. However, for psychosocial interventions, the existing, reliable ways to test treatment fidelity quality are often labor intensive, and less burdensome strategies may not reflect actual cl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wiltsey Stirman, Shannon, Marques, Luana, Creed, Torrey A., Gutner, Cassidy A., DeRubeis, Robert, Barnett, Paul G., Kuhn, Eric, Suvak, Michael, Owen, Jason, Vogt, Dawne, Jo, Booil, Schoenwald, Sonja, Johnson, Clara, Mallard, Kera, Beristianos, Matthew, La Bash, Heidi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5964900/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29789017
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-018-0756-3
_version_ 1783325265201463296
author Wiltsey Stirman, Shannon
Marques, Luana
Creed, Torrey A.
Gutner, Cassidy A.
DeRubeis, Robert
Barnett, Paul G.
Kuhn, Eric
Suvak, Michael
Owen, Jason
Vogt, Dawne
Jo, Booil
Schoenwald, Sonja
Johnson, Clara
Mallard, Kera
Beristianos, Matthew
La Bash, Heidi
author_facet Wiltsey Stirman, Shannon
Marques, Luana
Creed, Torrey A.
Gutner, Cassidy A.
DeRubeis, Robert
Barnett, Paul G.
Kuhn, Eric
Suvak, Michael
Owen, Jason
Vogt, Dawne
Jo, Booil
Schoenwald, Sonja
Johnson, Clara
Mallard, Kera
Beristianos, Matthew
La Bash, Heidi
author_sort Wiltsey Stirman, Shannon
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Identifying scalable strategies for assessing fidelity is a key challenge in implementation science. However, for psychosocial interventions, the existing, reliable ways to test treatment fidelity quality are often labor intensive, and less burdensome strategies may not reflect actual clinical practice. Cognitive behavioral therapies (CBTs) provide clinicians with a set of effective core elements to help treat a multitude of disorders, which, evidence suggests, need to be delivered with fidelity to maximize potential client impact. The current “gold standard” for rating CBTs is rating recordings of therapy sessions, which is extremely time-consuming and requires a substantial amount of initial training. Although CBTs can vary based on the target disorder, one common element employed in most CBTs is the use of worksheets to identify specific behaviors and thoughts that affect a client’s ability to recover. The present study will develop and evaluate an innovative new approach to rate CBT fidelity, by developing a universal CBT scoring system based on worksheets completed in therapy sessions. METHODS: To develop a scoring system for CBT worksheets, we will compile common CBT elements from a variety of CBT worksheets for a range of psychiatric disorders and create adherence and competence measures. We will collect archival worksheets from past studies to test the scoring system and assess test-retest reliability. To evaluate whether CBT worksheet scoring accurately reflects clinician fidelity, we will recruit clinicians who are engaged in a CBT for depression, anxiety, and/or posttraumatic stress disorder. Clinicians and clients will transmit routine therapy materials produced in session (e.g., worksheets, clinical notes, session recordings) to the study team after each session. We will compare observer-rated fidelity, clinical notes, and fidelity-rated worksheets to identify the most effective and efficient method to assess clinician fidelity. Clients will also be randomly assigned to either complete the CBT worksheets on paper forms or on a mobile application (app) to learn if worksheet format influences clinician and client experience or differs in terms of reflecting fidelity. DISCUSSION: Scoring fidelity using CBT worksheets may allow clinics to test fidelity in a short and effective manner, enhancing continuous quality improvement in the workplace. Clinicians and clinics can use such data to improve clinician fidelity in real time, leading to improved patient outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03479398. Retrospectively registered March 20, 2018.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5964900
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59649002018-05-24 Leveraging routine clinical materials and mobile technology to assess CBT fidelity: the Innovative Methods to Assess Psychotherapy Practices (imAPP) study Wiltsey Stirman, Shannon Marques, Luana Creed, Torrey A. Gutner, Cassidy A. DeRubeis, Robert Barnett, Paul G. Kuhn, Eric Suvak, Michael Owen, Jason Vogt, Dawne Jo, Booil Schoenwald, Sonja Johnson, Clara Mallard, Kera Beristianos, Matthew La Bash, Heidi Implement Sci Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Identifying scalable strategies for assessing fidelity is a key challenge in implementation science. However, for psychosocial interventions, the existing, reliable ways to test treatment fidelity quality are often labor intensive, and less burdensome strategies may not reflect actual clinical practice. Cognitive behavioral therapies (CBTs) provide clinicians with a set of effective core elements to help treat a multitude of disorders, which, evidence suggests, need to be delivered with fidelity to maximize potential client impact. The current “gold standard” for rating CBTs is rating recordings of therapy sessions, which is extremely time-consuming and requires a substantial amount of initial training. Although CBTs can vary based on the target disorder, one common element employed in most CBTs is the use of worksheets to identify specific behaviors and thoughts that affect a client’s ability to recover. The present study will develop and evaluate an innovative new approach to rate CBT fidelity, by developing a universal CBT scoring system based on worksheets completed in therapy sessions. METHODS: To develop a scoring system for CBT worksheets, we will compile common CBT elements from a variety of CBT worksheets for a range of psychiatric disorders and create adherence and competence measures. We will collect archival worksheets from past studies to test the scoring system and assess test-retest reliability. To evaluate whether CBT worksheet scoring accurately reflects clinician fidelity, we will recruit clinicians who are engaged in a CBT for depression, anxiety, and/or posttraumatic stress disorder. Clinicians and clients will transmit routine therapy materials produced in session (e.g., worksheets, clinical notes, session recordings) to the study team after each session. We will compare observer-rated fidelity, clinical notes, and fidelity-rated worksheets to identify the most effective and efficient method to assess clinician fidelity. Clients will also be randomly assigned to either complete the CBT worksheets on paper forms or on a mobile application (app) to learn if worksheet format influences clinician and client experience or differs in terms of reflecting fidelity. DISCUSSION: Scoring fidelity using CBT worksheets may allow clinics to test fidelity in a short and effective manner, enhancing continuous quality improvement in the workplace. Clinicians and clinics can use such data to improve clinician fidelity in real time, leading to improved patient outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03479398. Retrospectively registered March 20, 2018. BioMed Central 2018-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5964900/ /pubmed/29789017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-018-0756-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Wiltsey Stirman, Shannon
Marques, Luana
Creed, Torrey A.
Gutner, Cassidy A.
DeRubeis, Robert
Barnett, Paul G.
Kuhn, Eric
Suvak, Michael
Owen, Jason
Vogt, Dawne
Jo, Booil
Schoenwald, Sonja
Johnson, Clara
Mallard, Kera
Beristianos, Matthew
La Bash, Heidi
Leveraging routine clinical materials and mobile technology to assess CBT fidelity: the Innovative Methods to Assess Psychotherapy Practices (imAPP) study
title Leveraging routine clinical materials and mobile technology to assess CBT fidelity: the Innovative Methods to Assess Psychotherapy Practices (imAPP) study
title_full Leveraging routine clinical materials and mobile technology to assess CBT fidelity: the Innovative Methods to Assess Psychotherapy Practices (imAPP) study
title_fullStr Leveraging routine clinical materials and mobile technology to assess CBT fidelity: the Innovative Methods to Assess Psychotherapy Practices (imAPP) study
title_full_unstemmed Leveraging routine clinical materials and mobile technology to assess CBT fidelity: the Innovative Methods to Assess Psychotherapy Practices (imAPP) study
title_short Leveraging routine clinical materials and mobile technology to assess CBT fidelity: the Innovative Methods to Assess Psychotherapy Practices (imAPP) study
title_sort leveraging routine clinical materials and mobile technology to assess cbt fidelity: the innovative methods to assess psychotherapy practices (imapp) study
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5964900/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29789017
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-018-0756-3
work_keys_str_mv AT wiltseystirmanshannon leveragingroutineclinicalmaterialsandmobiletechnologytoassesscbtfidelitytheinnovativemethodstoassesspsychotherapypracticesimappstudy
AT marquesluana leveragingroutineclinicalmaterialsandmobiletechnologytoassesscbtfidelitytheinnovativemethodstoassesspsychotherapypracticesimappstudy
AT creedtorreya leveragingroutineclinicalmaterialsandmobiletechnologytoassesscbtfidelitytheinnovativemethodstoassesspsychotherapypracticesimappstudy
AT gutnercassidya leveragingroutineclinicalmaterialsandmobiletechnologytoassesscbtfidelitytheinnovativemethodstoassesspsychotherapypracticesimappstudy
AT derubeisrobert leveragingroutineclinicalmaterialsandmobiletechnologytoassesscbtfidelitytheinnovativemethodstoassesspsychotherapypracticesimappstudy
AT barnettpaulg leveragingroutineclinicalmaterialsandmobiletechnologytoassesscbtfidelitytheinnovativemethodstoassesspsychotherapypracticesimappstudy
AT kuhneric leveragingroutineclinicalmaterialsandmobiletechnologytoassesscbtfidelitytheinnovativemethodstoassesspsychotherapypracticesimappstudy
AT suvakmichael leveragingroutineclinicalmaterialsandmobiletechnologytoassesscbtfidelitytheinnovativemethodstoassesspsychotherapypracticesimappstudy
AT owenjason leveragingroutineclinicalmaterialsandmobiletechnologytoassesscbtfidelitytheinnovativemethodstoassesspsychotherapypracticesimappstudy
AT vogtdawne leveragingroutineclinicalmaterialsandmobiletechnologytoassesscbtfidelitytheinnovativemethodstoassesspsychotherapypracticesimappstudy
AT jobooil leveragingroutineclinicalmaterialsandmobiletechnologytoassesscbtfidelitytheinnovativemethodstoassesspsychotherapypracticesimappstudy
AT schoenwaldsonja leveragingroutineclinicalmaterialsandmobiletechnologytoassesscbtfidelitytheinnovativemethodstoassesspsychotherapypracticesimappstudy
AT johnsonclara leveragingroutineclinicalmaterialsandmobiletechnologytoassesscbtfidelitytheinnovativemethodstoassesspsychotherapypracticesimappstudy
AT mallardkera leveragingroutineclinicalmaterialsandmobiletechnologytoassesscbtfidelitytheinnovativemethodstoassesspsychotherapypracticesimappstudy
AT beristianosmatthew leveragingroutineclinicalmaterialsandmobiletechnologytoassesscbtfidelitytheinnovativemethodstoassesspsychotherapypracticesimappstudy
AT labashheidi leveragingroutineclinicalmaterialsandmobiletechnologytoassesscbtfidelitytheinnovativemethodstoassesspsychotherapypracticesimappstudy