Cargando…

Health professionals’ and coroners’ views on less invasive perinatal and paediatric autopsy: a qualitative study

OBJECTIVE: To assess health professionals’ and coroners’ attitudes towards non-minimally and minimally invasive autopsy in the perinatal and paediatric setting. METHODS: A qualitative study using semistructured interviews. Data were analysed thematically. RESULTS: Twenty-five health professionals (i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lewis, Celine, Hill, Melissa, Arthurs, Owen J, Hutchinson, John C, Chitty, Lyn S, Sebire, Neil
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5965355/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29438963
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2017-314424
_version_ 1783325341504241664
author Lewis, Celine
Hill, Melissa
Arthurs, Owen J
Hutchinson, John C
Chitty, Lyn S
Sebire, Neil
author_facet Lewis, Celine
Hill, Melissa
Arthurs, Owen J
Hutchinson, John C
Chitty, Lyn S
Sebire, Neil
author_sort Lewis, Celine
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess health professionals’ and coroners’ attitudes towards non-minimally and minimally invasive autopsy in the perinatal and paediatric setting. METHODS: A qualitative study using semistructured interviews. Data were analysed thematically. RESULTS: Twenty-five health professionals (including perinatal/paediatric pathologists and anatomical pathology technologists, obstetricians, fetal medicine consultants and bereavement midwives, intensive care consultants and family liaison nurses, a consultant neonatologist and a paediatric radiologist) and four coroners participated. Participants viewed less invasive methods of autopsy as a positive development in prenatal and paediatric care that could increase autopsy rates. Several procedural and psychological benefits were highlighted including improved diagnostic accuracy in some circumstances, potential for faster turnaround times, parental familiarity with imaging and laparoscopic approaches, and benefits to parents and faith groups who object to invasive approaches. Concerns around the limitations of the technology such not reaching the same levels of certainty as full autopsy, unsuitability of imaging in certain circumstances, the potential for missing a diagnosis (or misdiagnosis) and de-skilling the workforce were identified. Finally, a number of implementation issues were raised including skills and training requirements for pathologists and radiologists, access to scanning equipment, required computational infrastructure, need for a multidisciplinary approach to interpret results, cost implications, equity of access and acceptance from health professionals and hospital managers. CONCLUSION: Health professionals and coroners viewed less invasive autopsy as a positive development in perinatal and paediatric care. However, to inform implementation a detailed health economic analysis and further exploration of parental views, particularly in different religious groups, are required.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5965355
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59653552018-05-31 Health professionals’ and coroners’ views on less invasive perinatal and paediatric autopsy: a qualitative study Lewis, Celine Hill, Melissa Arthurs, Owen J Hutchinson, John C Chitty, Lyn S Sebire, Neil Arch Dis Child Original Article OBJECTIVE: To assess health professionals’ and coroners’ attitudes towards non-minimally and minimally invasive autopsy in the perinatal and paediatric setting. METHODS: A qualitative study using semistructured interviews. Data were analysed thematically. RESULTS: Twenty-five health professionals (including perinatal/paediatric pathologists and anatomical pathology technologists, obstetricians, fetal medicine consultants and bereavement midwives, intensive care consultants and family liaison nurses, a consultant neonatologist and a paediatric radiologist) and four coroners participated. Participants viewed less invasive methods of autopsy as a positive development in prenatal and paediatric care that could increase autopsy rates. Several procedural and psychological benefits were highlighted including improved diagnostic accuracy in some circumstances, potential for faster turnaround times, parental familiarity with imaging and laparoscopic approaches, and benefits to parents and faith groups who object to invasive approaches. Concerns around the limitations of the technology such not reaching the same levels of certainty as full autopsy, unsuitability of imaging in certain circumstances, the potential for missing a diagnosis (or misdiagnosis) and de-skilling the workforce were identified. Finally, a number of implementation issues were raised including skills and training requirements for pathologists and radiologists, access to scanning equipment, required computational infrastructure, need for a multidisciplinary approach to interpret results, cost implications, equity of access and acceptance from health professionals and hospital managers. CONCLUSION: Health professionals and coroners viewed less invasive autopsy as a positive development in perinatal and paediatric care. However, to inform implementation a detailed health economic analysis and further exploration of parental views, particularly in different religious groups, are required. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-06 2018-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5965355/ /pubmed/29438963 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2017-314424 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Original Article
Lewis, Celine
Hill, Melissa
Arthurs, Owen J
Hutchinson, John C
Chitty, Lyn S
Sebire, Neil
Health professionals’ and coroners’ views on less invasive perinatal and paediatric autopsy: a qualitative study
title Health professionals’ and coroners’ views on less invasive perinatal and paediatric autopsy: a qualitative study
title_full Health professionals’ and coroners’ views on less invasive perinatal and paediatric autopsy: a qualitative study
title_fullStr Health professionals’ and coroners’ views on less invasive perinatal and paediatric autopsy: a qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Health professionals’ and coroners’ views on less invasive perinatal and paediatric autopsy: a qualitative study
title_short Health professionals’ and coroners’ views on less invasive perinatal and paediatric autopsy: a qualitative study
title_sort health professionals’ and coroners’ views on less invasive perinatal and paediatric autopsy: a qualitative study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5965355/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29438963
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2017-314424
work_keys_str_mv AT lewisceline healthprofessionalsandcoronersviewsonlessinvasiveperinatalandpaediatricautopsyaqualitativestudy
AT hillmelissa healthprofessionalsandcoronersviewsonlessinvasiveperinatalandpaediatricautopsyaqualitativestudy
AT arthursowenj healthprofessionalsandcoronersviewsonlessinvasiveperinatalandpaediatricautopsyaqualitativestudy
AT hutchinsonjohnc healthprofessionalsandcoronersviewsonlessinvasiveperinatalandpaediatricautopsyaqualitativestudy
AT chittylyns healthprofessionalsandcoronersviewsonlessinvasiveperinatalandpaediatricautopsyaqualitativestudy
AT sebireneil healthprofessionalsandcoronersviewsonlessinvasiveperinatalandpaediatricautopsyaqualitativestudy