Cargando…
Health professionals’ and coroners’ views on less invasive perinatal and paediatric autopsy: a qualitative study
OBJECTIVE: To assess health professionals’ and coroners’ attitudes towards non-minimally and minimally invasive autopsy in the perinatal and paediatric setting. METHODS: A qualitative study using semistructured interviews. Data were analysed thematically. RESULTS: Twenty-five health professionals (i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5965355/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29438963 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2017-314424 |
_version_ | 1783325341504241664 |
---|---|
author | Lewis, Celine Hill, Melissa Arthurs, Owen J Hutchinson, John C Chitty, Lyn S Sebire, Neil |
author_facet | Lewis, Celine Hill, Melissa Arthurs, Owen J Hutchinson, John C Chitty, Lyn S Sebire, Neil |
author_sort | Lewis, Celine |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To assess health professionals’ and coroners’ attitudes towards non-minimally and minimally invasive autopsy in the perinatal and paediatric setting. METHODS: A qualitative study using semistructured interviews. Data were analysed thematically. RESULTS: Twenty-five health professionals (including perinatal/paediatric pathologists and anatomical pathology technologists, obstetricians, fetal medicine consultants and bereavement midwives, intensive care consultants and family liaison nurses, a consultant neonatologist and a paediatric radiologist) and four coroners participated. Participants viewed less invasive methods of autopsy as a positive development in prenatal and paediatric care that could increase autopsy rates. Several procedural and psychological benefits were highlighted including improved diagnostic accuracy in some circumstances, potential for faster turnaround times, parental familiarity with imaging and laparoscopic approaches, and benefits to parents and faith groups who object to invasive approaches. Concerns around the limitations of the technology such not reaching the same levels of certainty as full autopsy, unsuitability of imaging in certain circumstances, the potential for missing a diagnosis (or misdiagnosis) and de-skilling the workforce were identified. Finally, a number of implementation issues were raised including skills and training requirements for pathologists and radiologists, access to scanning equipment, required computational infrastructure, need for a multidisciplinary approach to interpret results, cost implications, equity of access and acceptance from health professionals and hospital managers. CONCLUSION: Health professionals and coroners viewed less invasive autopsy as a positive development in perinatal and paediatric care. However, to inform implementation a detailed health economic analysis and further exploration of parental views, particularly in different religious groups, are required. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5965355 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59653552018-05-31 Health professionals’ and coroners’ views on less invasive perinatal and paediatric autopsy: a qualitative study Lewis, Celine Hill, Melissa Arthurs, Owen J Hutchinson, John C Chitty, Lyn S Sebire, Neil Arch Dis Child Original Article OBJECTIVE: To assess health professionals’ and coroners’ attitudes towards non-minimally and minimally invasive autopsy in the perinatal and paediatric setting. METHODS: A qualitative study using semistructured interviews. Data were analysed thematically. RESULTS: Twenty-five health professionals (including perinatal/paediatric pathologists and anatomical pathology technologists, obstetricians, fetal medicine consultants and bereavement midwives, intensive care consultants and family liaison nurses, a consultant neonatologist and a paediatric radiologist) and four coroners participated. Participants viewed less invasive methods of autopsy as a positive development in prenatal and paediatric care that could increase autopsy rates. Several procedural and psychological benefits were highlighted including improved diagnostic accuracy in some circumstances, potential for faster turnaround times, parental familiarity with imaging and laparoscopic approaches, and benefits to parents and faith groups who object to invasive approaches. Concerns around the limitations of the technology such not reaching the same levels of certainty as full autopsy, unsuitability of imaging in certain circumstances, the potential for missing a diagnosis (or misdiagnosis) and de-skilling the workforce were identified. Finally, a number of implementation issues were raised including skills and training requirements for pathologists and radiologists, access to scanning equipment, required computational infrastructure, need for a multidisciplinary approach to interpret results, cost implications, equity of access and acceptance from health professionals and hospital managers. CONCLUSION: Health professionals and coroners viewed less invasive autopsy as a positive development in perinatal and paediatric care. However, to inform implementation a detailed health economic analysis and further exploration of parental views, particularly in different religious groups, are required. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-06 2018-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5965355/ /pubmed/29438963 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2017-314424 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Original Article Lewis, Celine Hill, Melissa Arthurs, Owen J Hutchinson, John C Chitty, Lyn S Sebire, Neil Health professionals’ and coroners’ views on less invasive perinatal and paediatric autopsy: a qualitative study |
title | Health professionals’ and coroners’ views on less invasive perinatal and paediatric autopsy: a qualitative study |
title_full | Health professionals’ and coroners’ views on less invasive perinatal and paediatric autopsy: a qualitative study |
title_fullStr | Health professionals’ and coroners’ views on less invasive perinatal and paediatric autopsy: a qualitative study |
title_full_unstemmed | Health professionals’ and coroners’ views on less invasive perinatal and paediatric autopsy: a qualitative study |
title_short | Health professionals’ and coroners’ views on less invasive perinatal and paediatric autopsy: a qualitative study |
title_sort | health professionals’ and coroners’ views on less invasive perinatal and paediatric autopsy: a qualitative study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5965355/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29438963 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2017-314424 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lewisceline healthprofessionalsandcoronersviewsonlessinvasiveperinatalandpaediatricautopsyaqualitativestudy AT hillmelissa healthprofessionalsandcoronersviewsonlessinvasiveperinatalandpaediatricautopsyaqualitativestudy AT arthursowenj healthprofessionalsandcoronersviewsonlessinvasiveperinatalandpaediatricautopsyaqualitativestudy AT hutchinsonjohnc healthprofessionalsandcoronersviewsonlessinvasiveperinatalandpaediatricautopsyaqualitativestudy AT chittylyns healthprofessionalsandcoronersviewsonlessinvasiveperinatalandpaediatricautopsyaqualitativestudy AT sebireneil healthprofessionalsandcoronersviewsonlessinvasiveperinatalandpaediatricautopsyaqualitativestudy |